Kim Sanghoon, Bae Sung Uk, Baek Seong Kyu, Jeong Woon Kyung
Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Korean J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jun;16(1):9-17. doi: 10.14216/kjco.20003. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
Early initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after colon cancer surgery has shown better oncologic outcomes in previous studies. However, the clinical impact of robotic and laparoscopic surgeries on the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy has not been widely evaluated. Hence, the study's aim was to compare the influence of both surgical approaches on the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy after colon cancer surgery.
From June 2011 to September 2017, 289 patients underwent curative robotic or laparoscopic surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer. To control for different demographic factors in the two groups, propensity score case matching was used at a 1:4 ratio. Finally, 190 patients were matched with 38 patients of the robotic surgery group and 152 patients of the laparoscopic surgery group.
The operation time was longer in the robotic surgery group (297 minutes vs. 170 minutes, respectively; P<0.001). However, conversion rate, number of retrieved lymph nodes, first flatus, first soft diet, length of stay, postoperative complication rate, and Clavien-Dindo grade were not significantly different between the two groups. Additionally, there was no difference in the time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy between the two groups (31.5 days vs. 29.0 days, respectively; P=0.226). Disease-free and overall survival rates were also not significantly different.
Robotic and laparoscopic surgeries showed no different impact on the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. This finding suggests that the two surgical approaches offer similar postoperative outcomes.
既往研究表明,结肠癌手术后尽早开始辅助化疗可取得更好的肿瘤学结局。然而,机器人手术和腹腔镜手术对辅助化疗开始时间的临床影响尚未得到广泛评估。因此,本研究的目的是比较这两种手术方式对结肠癌手术后辅助化疗开始时间的影响。
2011年6月至2017年9月,289例患者接受了根治性机器人手术或腹腔镜手术,随后接受II期和III期结肠癌的辅助化疗。为控制两组不同的人口统计学因素,采用倾向评分病例匹配,比例为1:4。最终,190例患者与机器人手术组的38例患者和腹腔镜手术组的152例患者进行了匹配。
机器人手术组的手术时间更长(分别为297分钟和170分钟;P<0.001)。然而,两组之间的转化率、获取的淋巴结数量、首次排气、首次进软食、住院时间、术后并发症发生率和Clavien-Dindo分级并无显著差异。此外,两组开始辅助化疗的时间也没有差异(分别为31.5天和29.0天;P=0.226)。无病生存率和总生存率也无显著差异。
机器人手术和腹腔镜手术对辅助化疗开始时间的影响无差异。这一发现表明,这两种手术方式的术后结局相似。