• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Implementation of Single-Tab Electrodes for Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Measures.单电极生物阻抗谱测量的实现。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2020 Jun;18(3):277-283. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2019.0035. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
2
Correlation of Bioimpedance Spectroscopy with Risk Factors for the Development of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.生物电阻抗光谱与乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿发生风险因素的相关性
Lymphat Res Biol. 2018 Dec;16(6):533-537. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2017.0078. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
3
Comparison of perometry-based volumetric arm measurements and bioimpedance spectroscopy for early identification of lymphedema in a prospectively-screened cohort of breast cancer patients.基于视野计的上肢容积测量与生物电阻抗光谱法在乳腺癌前瞻性筛查队列中早期识别淋巴水肿的比较
Lymphology. 2021;54(1):1-11.
4
The impact of monitoring techniques on progression to chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema: a meta-analysis comparing bioimpedance spectroscopy versus circumferential measurements.监测技术对慢性乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿进展的影响:一项比较生物电阻抗光谱法与周径测量法的荟萃分析
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Feb;185(3):709-740. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05988-6. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
5
Interchangeability of Two Electrode Placement Protocols Used by Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Devices in the Detection of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.两种生物阻抗光谱设备电极放置方案用于乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿检测的可互换性。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Apr;19(2):181-188. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0072. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
6
Utilization of bioimpedance spectroscopy in the prevention of chronic breast cancer-related lymphedema.生物电阻抗光谱法在预防慢性乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿中的应用。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Dec;166(3):809-815. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4451-x. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
7
The Early Detection of Breast Cancer Treatment-Related Lymphedema of the Arm.手臂乳腺癌治疗相关淋巴水肿的早期检测。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Feb;19(1):51-55. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0097. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
8
Reliability of L-Dex Scores for Assessment of Unilateral Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.用于评估单侧乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的L-Dex评分的可靠性
Eur J Breast Health. 2024 Sep 26;20(4):251-257. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2024-5-7.
9
Use of bioimpedance spectroscopy for prospective surveillance and early diagnosis of breast cancer-related lymphedema.生物阻抗光谱法在乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的前瞻性监测和早期诊断中的应用。
Breast Dis. 2021;40(2):85-93. doi: 10.3233/BD-201008.
10
Electrode Equivalence for Use in Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Assessment of Lymphedema.用于淋巴水肿生物电阻抗光谱评估的电极等效性
Lymphat Res Biol. 2019 Feb;17(1):51-59. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2018.0002. Epub 2018 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Magnetic resonance imaging and bioimpedance evaluation of lymphatic abnormalities in patients with breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema.磁共振成像和生物阻抗评估乳腺癌治疗相关淋巴水肿患者的淋巴异常。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Aug;183(1):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05765-5. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

本文引用的文献

1
An early warning surveillance programme for detecting upper limb deterioration after treatment for breast cancer: A novel technology supported system.一项用于检测乳腺癌治疗后上肢功能恶化的早期预警监测计划:一种新型技术支持系统。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Sep 15;15:635. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1636-8.
2
Breast cancer-related lymphedema after axillary lymph node dissection: does early postoperative prediction model work?腋窝淋巴结清扫术后与乳腺癌相关的淋巴水肿:早期术后预测模型是否有效?
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1413-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2933-0. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
3
Best Practice Guidelines in Assessment, Risk Reduction, Management, and Surveillance for Post-Breast Cancer Lymphedema.乳腺癌后淋巴水肿评估、风险降低、管理及监测的最佳实践指南
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013 Jun;5(2):134-144. doi: 10.1007/s12609-013-0105-0.
4
A Prospective Validation Study of Bioimpedance with Volume Displacement in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients at Risk for Lymphedema.一项针对有淋巴水肿风险的早期乳腺癌患者,运用生物电阻抗与体积位移法的前瞻性验证研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22 Suppl 3(0 3):S370-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4683-0. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
5
A pilot randomized trial evaluating lymphedema self-measurement with bioelectrical impedance, self-care adherence, and health outcomes.一项评估生物电阻抗淋巴水肿自我测量、自我护理依从性和健康结果的试点随机试验。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2014 Dec;12(4):258-66. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2014.0017.
6
Bioelectrical impedance self-measurement protocol development and daily variation between healthy volunteers and breast cancer survivors with lymphedema.生物电阻抗自我测量方案的制定以及健康志愿者与患有淋巴水肿的乳腺癌幸存者之间的每日差异
Lymphat Res Biol. 2014 Mar;12(1):2-9. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2013.0020. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
7
L-dex ratio in detecting breast cancer-related lymphedema: reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.L-dex 比值在检测乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿中的可靠性、敏感性和特异性。
Lymphology. 2013 Jun;46(2):85-96.
8
Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌术后单侧手臂淋巴水肿的发生率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):500-15. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
9
Breast-cancer related lymphedema: a review of procedure-specific incidence rates, clinical assessment AIDS, treatment paradigms, and risk reduction.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿:手术特异性发病率、临床评估辅助手段、治疗模式及风险降低的综述。
Breast J. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):357-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2012.01252.x.
10
Upper-body morbidity after breast cancer: incidence and evidence for evaluation, prevention, and management within a prospective surveillance model of care.乳腺癌患者的上半身发病情况:在前瞻性监测护理模式下评估、预防和管理的发生率和证据。
Cancer. 2012 Apr 15;118(8 Suppl):2237-49. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27467.

单电极生物阻抗谱测量的实现。

Implementation of Single-Tab Electrodes for Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Measures.

机构信息

Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Vanderbilt Dayani Center for Health and Wellness, Nashville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Lymphat Res Biol. 2020 Jun;18(3):277-283. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2019.0035. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1089/lrb.2019.0035
PMID:31536441
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7310215/
Abstract

Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) demonstrates proficiency in early identification of breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema (BCRL) development. Dual-tab electrodes were designed for consistent and easy electrode placement, however, single-tab electrodes positioned to mimic dual-tab placement on the body may make BIS technology more accessible in community hospitals and outpatient settings. The purpose of this study is to evaluate use of single-tab electrodes for BIS measurements and assess whether single-tab electrodes provide consistent BIS measurements in controls and patients with BCRL. Upper limb BIS ratios were obtained using ImpediMed L-Dex U400 in controls ( = 13; age = 23-75 years; 9 repeated measurements) using dual-tab and single-tab electrodes. BCRL patients ( = 17; Stage = 1.65 ± 0.49; number nodes removed = 16.3 ± 7.7; age = 50.9 ± 10.6 years; age range = 33-77 years) and healthy controls ( = 19) were evaluated to determine if single-tab electrodes provided discriminatory capacity for detecting BCRL. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), linear mixed-effects models, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and linear regression with two-sided -values <0.05 required for significance were applied. Single-tab electrodes were found to be statistically interchangeable with dual-tab electrodes (ICC = 0.966; 95% confidence interval = 0.937-0.982). No evidence of differences in single-tab versus dual-tab measurements were found for L-Dex ratios ( = 0.74) from the linear mixed-effects model. Repeated trials involving reuse of the same electrodes revealed a trend toward increases in L-Dex ratio for both styles of electrodes. Single-tab electrodes were significant ( < 0.0001) for discriminating between BCRL and control subjects. Findings expand upon the potential use of BIS in clinic and research settings and suggest that readily available single-tab electrodes provide similar results as dual-tab electrodes for BIS measurements.

摘要

生物阻抗谱(BIS)在早期识别乳腺癌治疗相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)的发展方面表现出色。双电极设计用于一致且易于放置电极,但是,为了模拟双电极在身体上的放置位置而定位的单电极可能会使 BIS 技术在社区医院和门诊环境中更容易获得。本研究的目的是评估单电极用于 BIS 测量的效果,并评估单电极在 BCRL 患者和对照者中是否提供一致的 BIS 测量结果。使用 ImpediMed L-Dex U400 在对照者(n=13;年龄 23-75 岁;9 次重复测量)中使用双电极和单电极获得上肢 BIS 比值。评估 BCRL 患者(n=17;阶段 1.65±0.49;切除的淋巴结数 16.3±7.7;年龄 50.9±10.6 岁;年龄范围 33-77 岁)和健康对照者(n=19),以确定单电极是否具有检测 BCRL 的鉴别能力。应用组内相关系数(ICC)、线性混合效应模型、Wilcoxon 秩和检验和双侧线性回归,具有统计学意义的-值 <0.05。单电极与双电极在统计学上是可互换的(ICC=0.966;95%置信区间 0.937-0.982)。线性混合效应模型显示,L-Dex 比值的单电极与双电极测量之间没有差异(=0.74)。涉及相同电极重复使用的重复试验显示出两种电极的 L-Dex 比值均有增加的趋势。单电极在区分 BCRL 和对照组方面具有统计学意义(<0.0001)。这些发现扩展了 BIS 在临床和研究环境中的潜在用途,并表明易于获得的单电极可提供与双电极相似的 BIS 测量结果。