Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Physiotherapy Department, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Apr;19(2):181-188. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2020.0072. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) devices are routinely used in the assessment of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). The equipotential electrode placement is a commonly used protocol for the assessment of BCRL. However, the sternal notch electrode placement protocol is also in use. Whether these two protocols are interchangeable is not known. Ethical approval was received from the institutional ethics committee at Tata Memorial Hospital, India. BIS measurements (whole-body right side and affected and unaffected arms) of 100 women with or at risk of BCRL were measured using equipotential and sternal notch protocols. Resistance at zero frequency (R0) was determined, and agreement of the absolute R0 values and the R0 ratio (unaffected/affected) between protocols was evaluated (Bland-Altman analysis and Passing-Bablok regression analysis). Mean absolute differences between protocols were very small for whole-body right side, affected arm, unaffected arm, and the interarm ratio at 0.23 ohms (95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.8 to 4.3), -5.7 ohms (95% CI: -7.5 to -3.9), -9.09 ohms (95% CI: -11.4 to -6.8), and -0.008 ohms (95% CI: -0.02 to 0.001), respectively. Limits of agreement (two standard deviation) between protocols were narrow for whole-body right side, affected arm, unaffected arm, and interarm ratio without any systematic or proportional differences for whole-body right side and the interarm ratio (5.8% to -5.6%, 3.7% to -7.4%, 3.5% to -8.2%, and 5.8% to -5.6%, respectively). The equipotential and sternal notch protocols could be used interchangeably in BCRL assessment. The Clinical Trial Registration number: CTRI/2017/12/010762.
生物阻抗谱(BIS)设备常用于评估乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿(BCRL)。等电位电极放置是评估 BCRL 的常用方案。然而,胸骨切迹电极放置方案也在使用中。这两种方案是否可以互换尚不清楚。本研究获得了印度塔塔纪念医院机构伦理委员会的批准。使用等电位和胸骨切迹方案测量了 100 名患有或有患 BCRL 风险的女性的 BIS 测量值(全身右侧和受累及未受累手臂)。确定了零频率下的电阻(R0),并评估了协议之间绝对 R0 值和 R0 比值(未受累/受累)的一致性(Bland-Altman 分析和 Passing-Bablok 回归分析)。全身右侧、受累臂、未受累臂和双臂比值的协议间平均绝对差异非常小,分别为 0.23 欧姆(95%置信区间 [CI]:-3.8 至 4.3)、-5.7 欧姆(95% CI:-7.5 至-3.9)、-9.09 欧姆(95% CI:-11.4 至-6.8)和-0.008 欧姆(95% CI:-0.02 至 0.001)。全身右侧和双臂比值的协议间界限(两个标准差)较窄,无系统或比例差异(全身右侧为 5.8%至-5.6%,双臂比值为 3.7%至-7.4%、3.5%至-8.2%和 5.8%至-5.6%)。在 BCRL 评估中,可以互换使用等电位和胸骨切迹方案。临床试验注册号:CTRI/2017/12/010762。