Suppr超能文献

乳房切除术后进行乳房重建或未进行重建的患者报告结局指标(PROMs):一项系统评价。

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review.

作者信息

Cordova Leonardo Z, Hunter-Smith David J, Rozen Warren M

机构信息

Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Australia.

Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School at Monash University, The Alfred Centre, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):441-451. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.07.02.

Abstract

The cornerstone of reconstructive surgery following mastectomy is to restore cosmesis and improve physical and psychological health. Consequently, it has become essential for instruments that measure surgical outcomes to include the direct perspective of patients. Many reviews have failed to show significant improvements in quality of life domains following breast reconstruction compared to mastectomy alone. However, with advances in surgical techniques and patient reported outcome measure (PROM) assessment tools designed precisely for breast reconstruction patients, a modern systematic review is warranted. An electronic literature review was performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Medline (using PubMed) comparing patient reported outcome measures of patients undergoing versus patients undergoing . Studies in the English and Portuguese languages since the year 2000 were included. The review was undertaken adhering to PRISMA guidelines with last entry on the 31/5/2018. Full text review yield 42 articles of relevance to the inclusion criteria. The most widely used PROM instruments such as Breast-Q, EORTC-Q30/Q23, Short Form 36, FACT-B and others are explored. The specific difficulties conducting such studies and biases identified are investigated further. Studies comparing mastectomy alone against mastectomy with reconstruction show difficulties forming groups with similar clinical and epidemiological characteristics. There are inherent limitations to performing a randomised controlled trial on this topic, including matching patient groups in terms of age, socioeconomical background and cancer staging, and this affects the results of the PROM instruments. Within these limitations, the literature suggests that PROM support the use of breast reconstruction following mastectomy but care must be made selecting patients. The finding is supported by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines which state that breast reconstruction should be offered to all women undergoing breast cancer surgery.

摘要

乳房切除术后重建手术的基石是恢复美观并改善身心健康。因此,对于衡量手术效果的工具而言,纳入患者的直接观点已变得至关重要。许多综述未能表明与单纯乳房切除术相比,乳房重建术后生活质量领域有显著改善。然而,随着手术技术的进步以及专门为乳房重建患者设计的患者报告结局测量(PROM)评估工具的出现,进行一次现代的系统综述是很有必要的。使用CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆和Medline(通过PubMed)进行了电子文献综述,比较了接受[具体手术方式1]的患者与接受[具体手术方式2]的患者的患者报告结局测量。纳入了自2000年以来的英文和葡萄牙文研究。该综述遵循PRISMA指南进行,最后一次录入时间为2018年5月31日。全文综述得出42篇符合纳入标准的相关文章。探讨了最广泛使用的PROM工具,如乳房-Q、欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织- Q30/Q23、简短形式36、癌症治疗功能评估-乳腺及其他工具。进一步研究了进行此类研究的具体困难和所发现的偏差。比较单纯乳房切除术与乳房切除术后重建术的研究表明,难以形成具有相似临床和流行病学特征的组。在这个主题上进行随机对照试验存在固有的局限性,包括在年龄、社会经济背景和癌症分期方面匹配患者组,这会影响PROM工具的结果。在这些局限性范围内,文献表明PROM支持乳房切除术后进行乳房重建,但在选择患者时必须谨慎。这一发现得到了英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南的支持,该指南指出应向所有接受乳腺癌手术的女性提供乳房重建。

相似文献

7
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术用于预防乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2.
8
Patient reported outcome measures in breast cancer patients.乳腺癌患者的患者报告结局测量。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jul;44(7):963-968. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

4
Living Flat: Stories from Women of Color After Mastectomy.《直面生活:乳房切除术后有色人种女性的故事》
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan;32(1):104-114. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16337-y. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
7
Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer: from Detection to Treatment.乳腺癌中的种族差异:从检测到治疗
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Jan;26(1):10-20. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01472-8. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
9
Oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgery.肿瘤整形与乳房重建手术。
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 28;13:1176915. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1176915. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验