Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 20;14(9):e0222444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222444. eCollection 2019.
Acute kidney injury in hospital patients is common and associated with reduced survival and higher healthcare costs. The Tackling Acute Kidney Injury (TAKI) quality improvement project aimed to reduce mortality rates in patients with acute kidney injury by implementing a multicomponent intervention comprising of an electronic alert, care bundle and education in five UK hospitals across a variety of wards. A parallel developmental evaluation using a case study approach was conducted to provide the implementation teams with insights into factors that might impact intervention implementation and fidelity. The qualitative element of the evaluation will be reported.
29 semi-structured interviews with implementation teams across the five hospitals were carried out to identify perceived barriers and enablers to implementation. Interviews were taped and transcribed verbatim and Framework analysis was conducted.
Interviews generated four 'barriers and enablers' to implementation themes: i) practical/contextual factors, ii) skills and make-up of the TAKI implementation team, iii) design, development and implementation approach, iv) staff knowledge, attitudes, behaviours and support. Enablers included availability of specialist teams (e.g. educational teams), multi-disciplinary implementation teams with strong leadership, team-based package completion and proactive staff. Barriers were frequently the converse of facilitators.
Despite diversity of sites, a range of common local factors-contextual, intervention-based and individual-were identified as potential barriers and enablers to fidelity, including intervention structure/design and process of/approach to implementation. Future efforts should focus on early identification and management of barriers and tailored optimisation of known enablers such as leadership and multidisciplinary teams to encourage buy-in. Improved measures of real-time intervention and implementation fidelity would further assist local teams to target their support during such quality improvement initiatives.
医院患者的急性肾损伤很常见,与生存率降低和医疗成本增加有关。Tackling Acute Kidney Injury(TAKI)质量改进项目旨在通过在英国五家医院的各种病房实施包含电子警报、护理包和教育的多组分干预措施来降低急性肾损伤患者的死亡率。采用案例研究方法平行开展了发展性评估,为实施团队提供了对可能影响干预实施和一致性的因素的深入了解。本文将报告评估的定性内容。
对五家医院的实施团队进行了 29 次半结构式访谈,以确定实施过程中的障碍和促进因素。访谈进行了录音和逐字记录,并进行了框架分析。
访谈生成了四个实施主题的“障碍和促进因素”:i)实际/背景因素,ii)TAKI 实施团队的技能和组成,iii)设计、开发和实施方法,iv)员工的知识、态度、行为和支持。促进因素包括专业团队(如教育团队)的可用性、具有强大领导力的多学科实施团队、基于团队的包完成和积极主动的员工。障碍往往是促进因素的反面。
尽管各地点不同,但一系列常见的当地因素——包括基于干预的因素和个体因素——被确定为一致性的潜在障碍和促进因素,包括干预结构/设计和实施的过程/方法。未来的努力应重点关注障碍的早期识别和管理,以及针对领导力和多学科团队等已知促进因素的有针对性的优化,以鼓励参与。实时干预和实施一致性的改进衡量标准将进一步帮助当地团队在这些质量改进计划中针对其提供支持。