Suppr超能文献

急性肾损伤复杂质量改进干预实施的障碍和促进因素:对 Tackling AKI 研究利益相关者认知的定性评估。

Barriers and enablers to the implementation of a complex quality improvement intervention for acute kidney injury: A qualitative evaluation of stakeholder perceptions of the Tackling AKI study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.

Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Sep 20;14(9):e0222444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222444. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury in hospital patients is common and associated with reduced survival and higher healthcare costs. The Tackling Acute Kidney Injury (TAKI) quality improvement project aimed to reduce mortality rates in patients with acute kidney injury by implementing a multicomponent intervention comprising of an electronic alert, care bundle and education in five UK hospitals across a variety of wards. A parallel developmental evaluation using a case study approach was conducted to provide the implementation teams with insights into factors that might impact intervention implementation and fidelity. The qualitative element of the evaluation will be reported.

METHODS

29 semi-structured interviews with implementation teams across the five hospitals were carried out to identify perceived barriers and enablers to implementation. Interviews were taped and transcribed verbatim and Framework analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Interviews generated four 'barriers and enablers' to implementation themes: i) practical/contextual factors, ii) skills and make-up of the TAKI implementation team, iii) design, development and implementation approach, iv) staff knowledge, attitudes, behaviours and support. Enablers included availability of specialist teams (e.g. educational teams), multi-disciplinary implementation teams with strong leadership, team-based package completion and proactive staff. Barriers were frequently the converse of facilitators.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite diversity of sites, a range of common local factors-contextual, intervention-based and individual-were identified as potential barriers and enablers to fidelity, including intervention structure/design and process of/approach to implementation. Future efforts should focus on early identification and management of barriers and tailored optimisation of known enablers such as leadership and multidisciplinary teams to encourage buy-in. Improved measures of real-time intervention and implementation fidelity would further assist local teams to target their support during such quality improvement initiatives.

摘要

背景

医院患者的急性肾损伤很常见,与生存率降低和医疗成本增加有关。Tackling Acute Kidney Injury(TAKI)质量改进项目旨在通过在英国五家医院的各种病房实施包含电子警报、护理包和教育的多组分干预措施来降低急性肾损伤患者的死亡率。采用案例研究方法平行开展了发展性评估,为实施团队提供了对可能影响干预实施和一致性的因素的深入了解。本文将报告评估的定性内容。

方法

对五家医院的实施团队进行了 29 次半结构式访谈,以确定实施过程中的障碍和促进因素。访谈进行了录音和逐字记录,并进行了框架分析。

结果

访谈生成了四个实施主题的“障碍和促进因素”:i)实际/背景因素,ii)TAKI 实施团队的技能和组成,iii)设计、开发和实施方法,iv)员工的知识、态度、行为和支持。促进因素包括专业团队(如教育团队)的可用性、具有强大领导力的多学科实施团队、基于团队的包完成和积极主动的员工。障碍往往是促进因素的反面。

结论

尽管各地点不同,但一系列常见的当地因素——包括基于干预的因素和个体因素——被确定为一致性的潜在障碍和促进因素,包括干预结构/设计和实施的过程/方法。未来的努力应重点关注障碍的早期识别和管理,以及针对领导力和多学科团队等已知促进因素的有针对性的优化,以鼓励参与。实时干预和实施一致性的改进衡量标准将进一步帮助当地团队在这些质量改进计划中针对其提供支持。

相似文献

2
Design and Rationale of 'Tackling Acute Kidney Injury', a Multicentre Quality Improvement Study.
Nephron. 2016;134(3):200-204. doi: 10.1159/000447675. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
4
Beyond quality improvement: exploring why primary care teams engage in a voluntary audit and feedback program.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 2;17(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2765-3.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Beliefs and expectations of rural hospital practitioners towards a developing trauma system: A qualitative case study.
Injury. 2018 Jun;49(6):1070-1078. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.03.025. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
8
What impedes and what facilitates a quality improvement project for older hospitalized patients?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Feb;26(1):41-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt079. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
10
Helping primary care teams emerge through a quality improvement program.
Fam Pract. 2013 Apr;30(2):204-11. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms056. Epub 2012 Sep 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation Science in Acute Kidney Injury Care: Challenges and Opportunities.
Adv Kidney Dis Health. 2025 Mar;32(2):200-204. doi: 10.1053/j.akdh.2025.01.010.
2
Perspectives and Experiences of Patients with AKI: A Systematic Review.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Mar 1;20(3):326-336. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000605. Epub 2025 Jan 16.
3
Digital health and acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 27th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup.
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023 Dec;19(12):807-818. doi: 10.1038/s41581-023-00744-7. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
5
Determining the skills needed by frontline NHS staff to deliver quality improvement: findings from six case studies.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jun;31(6):450-461. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013065. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
6
Randomized Controlled Trial Evidence of Cost-Effectiveness of a Multifaceted AKI Intervention Approach.
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Dec 16;6(3):636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.12.004. eCollection 2021 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
An Organizational-Level Program of Intervention for AKI: A Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Mar;30(3):505-515. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018090886. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
2
When and how do 'effective' interventions need to be adapted and/or re-evaluated in new contexts? The need for guidance.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Jun;73(6):481-482. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210840. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
4
Design and Rationale of 'Tackling Acute Kidney Injury', a Multicentre Quality Improvement Study.
Nephron. 2016;134(3):200-204. doi: 10.1159/000447675. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
5
Demystifying theory and its use in improvement.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Mar;24(3):228-38. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003627. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
6
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.
9
The Model for Understanding Success in Quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan;21(1):13-20. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000010. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验