Suppr超能文献

培养过程中精确实时率估计的不足与精确鲁棒过程建模的解决方案。

The shortcomings of accurate rate estimations in cultivation processes and a solution for precise and robust process modeling.

机构信息

Department of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria.

Bilfinger Industrietechnik Salzburg GmbH, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2020 Feb;43(2):169-178. doi: 10.1007/s00449-019-02214-6. Epub 2019 Sep 20.

Abstract

The accurate estimation of cell growth or the substrate consumption rate is crucial for the understanding of the current state of a bioprocess. Rates unveil the actual cell status, making them valuable for quality-by-design concepts. However, in bioprocesses, the real rates are commonly not accessible due to analytical errors. We simulated Escherichia coli fed-batch fermentations, sampled at four different intervals and added five levels of noise to mimic analytical inaccuracy. We computed stepwise integral estimations with and without using moving average estimations, and smoothing spline interpolations to compare the accuracy and precision of each method to calculate the rates. We demonstrate that stepwise integration results in low accuracy and precision, especially at higher sampling frequencies. Contrary, a simple smoothing spline function displayed both the highest accuracy and precision regardless of the chosen sampling interval. Based on this, we tested three different options for substrate uptake rate estimations.

摘要

准确估计细胞生长或基质消耗速率对于理解生物过程的当前状态至关重要。这些速率揭示了实际的细胞状态,使其成为质量源于设计概念的有价值工具。然而,在生物过程中,由于分析误差,通常无法获得真实速率。我们模拟了大肠杆菌分批补料发酵,在四个不同的时间点进行采样,并添加了五个噪声水平来模拟分析的不准确性。我们使用和不使用移动平均估计计算了逐步积分估计,并使用平滑样条插值来比较每种方法计算速率的准确性和精密度。我们证明,逐步积分的结果准确性和精密度都较低,尤其是在较高的采样频率下。相反,无论选择的采样间隔如何,简单的平滑样条函数都显示出了最高的准确性和精密度。基于这一点,我们测试了三种不同的基质摄取速率估计选项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/daa3/6960212/ae95d7383a24/449_2019_2214_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验