• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

台湾在死亡证明上引入孕期复选框后孕产妇死亡人数和原因的变化。

Changes in the number and causes of maternal deaths after the introduction of pregnancy checkbox on the death certificate in Taiwan.

机构信息

Institute of Medicine, Chung-Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;58(5):680-683. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.07.017.

DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2019.07.017
PMID:31542092
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in the number and causes of maternal deaths after the introduction of pregnancy checkbox on the death certificate in January 2014 in Taiwan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We first used the cause-of-death (COD) mortality data for years 2010 through 2017 to examine the number of deaths by item of pregnancy checkbox. We then compared the distribution of the causes of maternal deaths before and after the introduction of pregnancy checkbox.

RESULTS

Between 2014 and 2017, 111 women died, for whom the certifiers indicated the following in the pregnancy checkbox items: 2 (pregnant at the time of death; n = 10), 3 (died within 42 days after the termination of pregnancy; n = 64), and 4 (died between 43 days and 1 year after the termination of pregnancy; n = 37). However, in only 61 of the 111 deaths, the certifiers reported pregnancy or delivery-related diagnosis in the COD section of the death certificate-5 each for items 2 and 4 and 51 for item 3. The number of maternal deaths was 55 in 2010-2013; this number increased to 82 in 2014-2017. A decline in the percentage of maternal deaths from obstetric hemorrhage was noted from 38% (21/55) in 2010-2013 to 21% (17/82) in 2014-2017.

CONCLUSION

The number of maternal deaths increased, and the distribution of causes of maternal deaths changed after the introduction of pregnancy checkbox. Additional studies are required to examine the possible misclassification of pregnancy-associated deaths indicated in the pregnancy checkbox.

摘要

目的

探讨 2014 年 1 月在台湾死亡证明上引入妊娠复选框后,孕产妇死亡数量和死因的变化。

材料和方法

我们首先使用 2010 年至 2017 年的死因死亡率数据,检查妊娠复选框各项目的死亡人数。然后,我们比较了引入妊娠复选框前后孕产妇死亡原因的分布情况。

结果

2014 年至 2017 年间,有 111 名妇女死亡,其证明人在妊娠复选框项目中注明以下内容:2(死亡时怀孕;n=10)、3(妊娠终止后 42 天内死亡;n=64)和 4(妊娠终止后 43 天至 1 年内死亡;n=37)。然而,在这 111 例死亡中,只有 61 例证明人在死亡证明的死因部分报告了与妊娠或分娩相关的诊断——项目 2 和 4 各有 5 例,项目 3 有 51 例。2010-2013 年孕产妇死亡人数为 55 例;2014-2017 年这一数字增加到 82 例。从 2010-2013 年的 38%(21/55)到 2014-2017 年的 21%(17/82),产科出血导致的孕产妇死亡百分比有所下降。

结论

引入妊娠复选框后,孕产妇死亡人数增加,孕产妇死亡原因分布发生变化。需要进一步研究以检查妊娠复选框中指出的与妊娠相关的死亡可能存在的错误分类。

相似文献

1
Changes in the number and causes of maternal deaths after the introduction of pregnancy checkbox on the death certificate in Taiwan.台湾在死亡证明上引入孕期复选框后孕产妇死亡人数和原因的变化。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;58(5):680-683. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.07.017.
2
Evaluation of the Pregnancy Status Checkbox on the Identification of Maternal Deaths.评估用于识别孕产妇死亡的妊娠状态复选框。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2020 Jan;69(1):1-25.
3
Pregnant? Validity of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates in four states, and characteristics associated with pregnancy checkbox errors.孕妇?四个州死亡证明中怀孕复选框的有效性,以及与怀孕复选框错误相关的特征。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):269.e1-269.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
4
Value and disvalue of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates in the United States-impact on newly released 2018 maternal mortality data.美国死亡证明中“怀孕”勾选框的价值和弊端——对新发布的 2018 年孕产妇死亡率数据的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):393.e1-393.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.046. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
Maternal Mortality in the United States: Changes in Coding, Publication, and Data Release, 2018.美国的孕产妇死亡率:2018年编码、发布及数据公布的变化
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2020 Jan;69(2):1-18.
6
Underreporting and misclassification of maternal mortality in Taiwan.台湾地区孕产妇死亡报告不足与错误分类情况
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997 Aug;76(7):629-36. doi: 10.3109/00016349709024602.
7
Contribution of maternal age and pregnancy checkbox on maternal mortality ratios in the United States, 1978-2012.1978 - 2012年美国孕产妇年龄和妊娠复选框对孕产妇死亡率的影响
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):352.e1-352.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.042. Epub 2017 May 5.
8
Changes in pregnancy mortality ascertainment: United States, 1999-2005.妊娠死亡率的变化:美国,1999-2005 年。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):104-110. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821fd49d.
9
Maternal mortality in the United States: are the high and rising rates due to changes in obstetrical factors, maternal medical conditions, or maternal mortality surveillance?美国的孕产妇死亡率:如此之高且不断上升的比率是由于产科因素、产妇医疗状况还是孕产妇死亡率监测的变化所致?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;230(4):440.e1-440.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.038. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
10
Identifying maternal deaths with the use of hospital data versus death certificates: a retrospective population-based study.利用医院数据与死亡证明识别产妇死亡:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2021 May 21;9(2):E539-E547. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200201. Print 2021 Apr-Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Incompleteness and misclassification of maternal death recording: a systematic review and meta-analysis.孕产妇死亡记录的不完整性和分类错误:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Nov 15;23(1):794. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06077-4.
2
Characteristics of Maternal Mortality Missed by Vital Statistics in Hong Kong, 2000-2019.2000-2019 年香港生命统计数据漏报的孕产妇死亡特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230429. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0429.