• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估用于识别孕产妇死亡的妊娠状态复选框。

Evaluation of the Pregnancy Status Checkbox on the Identification of Maternal Deaths.

作者信息

Hoyert Donna L, Uddin Sayeedha F G, Miniño Arialdi M

出版信息

Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2020 Jan;69(1):1-25.

PMID:32510312
Abstract

Objectives-This report quantifies the impact of the inclusion of a pregnancy status checkbox item on the U.S. Standard Certificate of Death on the number of deaths classified as maternal. Maternal mortality rates calculated with and without using the checkbox information for deaths in 2015 and 2016 are presented. Methods-This report is based on cause-of-death information from 2015 and 2016 death certificates collected through the National Vital Statistics System. Records originally assigned to a specified range of ICD-10 codes (i.e., A34, O00-O99) when using information from the checkbox item were recoded without using the checkbox item. Ratios of deaths assigned as maternal deaths using checkbox item information to deaths assigned without checkbox item information were calculated to quantify the impact of the pregnancy status checkbox item on the classification of maternal deaths for 47 states and the District of Columbia. Maternal mortality rates for all jurisdictions calculated using cause-of-death information entered on the certificate with and without the checkbox were compared overall and by characteristics of the decedent. Results-Use of information from the checkbox, along with information from the cause-of-death section of the certificate, identified 1,527 deaths as maternal compared with 498 without the checkbox in 2015 and 2016 (ratio = 3.07), with the impact varying by characteristics of the decedent such as age at death. The ratio for women under age 25 was 2.15 (204 compared with 95 deaths) but was 14.14 (523 compared with 37 deaths) for women aged 40-54. Without the adoption of the checkbox item, maternal mortality rates in both 2015 and 2016 would have been reported as 8.7 deaths per 100,000 live births compared with 8.9 in 2002. With the checkbox, the maternal mortality rate would be reported as 20.9 and 21.8 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2015 and 2016.

摘要

目标——本报告量化了在美国标准死亡证明中加入妊娠状态复选框项目对归类为孕产妇死亡数量的影响。报告呈现了在计算2015年和2016年死亡的孕产妇死亡率时使用和不使用复选框信息的情况。方法——本报告基于通过国家生命统计系统收集的2015年和2016年死亡证明中的死因信息。在使用复选框项目信息时最初被指定为特定范围的ICD - 10编码(即A34、O00 - O99)的记录,在不使用复选框项目的情况下进行了重新编码。计算了使用复选框项目信息归类为孕产妇死亡的数量与不使用复选框项目信息归类为孕产妇死亡的数量之比,以量化妊娠状态复选框项目对47个州和哥伦比亚特区孕产妇死亡分类的影响。总体上以及按死者特征比较了使用证明上填写的死因信息(有复选框和无复选框)计算的所有司法管辖区的孕产妇死亡率。结果——使用复选框信息以及证明死因部分的信息,在2015年和2016年确定了1527例死亡为孕产妇死亡,而不使用复选框时为498例(比率 = 3.07),其影响因死者特征(如死亡年龄)而异。25岁以下女性的比率为2.15(204例死亡与95例死亡相比),但40 - 54岁女性的比率为14.14(523例死亡与37例死亡相比)。如果不采用复选框项目,2015年和2016年的孕产妇死亡率报告均为每10万例活产8.7例死亡,而200年为8.9例。有了复选框,2015年和2016年的孕产妇死亡率报告将分别为每10万例活产20.9例和21.8例死亡。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the Pregnancy Status Checkbox on the Identification of Maternal Deaths.评估用于识别孕产妇死亡的妊娠状态复选框。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2020 Jan;69(1):1-25.
2
Value and disvalue of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates in the United States-impact on newly released 2018 maternal mortality data.美国死亡证明中“怀孕”勾选框的价值和弊端——对新发布的 2018 年孕产妇死亡率数据的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):393.e1-393.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.046. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
3
Maternal Mortality in the United States: Changes in Coding, Publication, and Data Release, 2018.美国的孕产妇死亡率:2018年编码、发布及数据公布的变化
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2020 Jan;69(2):1-18.
4
Pregnant? Validity of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates in four states, and characteristics associated with pregnancy checkbox errors.孕妇?四个州死亡证明中怀孕复选框的有效性,以及与怀孕复选框错误相关的特征。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Mar;222(3):269.e1-269.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
5
Changes in the number and causes of maternal deaths after the introduction of pregnancy checkbox on the death certificate in Taiwan.台湾在死亡证明上引入孕期复选框后孕产妇死亡人数和原因的变化。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;58(5):680-683. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2019.07.017.
6
Contribution of maternal age and pregnancy checkbox on maternal mortality ratios in the United States, 1978-2012.1978 - 2012年美国孕产妇年龄和妊娠复选框对孕产妇死亡率的影响
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):352.e1-352.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.042. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Changes in pregnancy mortality ascertainment: United States, 1999-2005.妊娠死亡率的变化:美国,1999-2005 年。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):104-110. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821fd49d.
8
Maternal mortality in the United States: are the high and rising rates due to changes in obstetrical factors, maternal medical conditions, or maternal mortality surveillance?美国的孕产妇死亡率:如此之高且不断上升的比率是由于产科因素、产妇医疗状况还是孕产妇死亡率监测的变化所致?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Apr;230(4):440.e1-440.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.12.038. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
9
Maternal mortality and related concepts.孕产妇死亡率及相关概念。
Vital Health Stat 3. 2007 Feb(33):1-13.
10
Rural-Urban Differences in Maternal Mortality Trends in the United States, 1999-2017: Accounting for the Impact of the Pregnancy Status Checkbox.美国城乡产妇死亡率趋势的差异,1999-2017:考虑妊娠状态复选框的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 May 20;191(6):1030-1039. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab300.

引用本文的文献

1
Traditional Versus Contemporary Models for Identifying Causes of Maternal Death: A Population-Based Study.传统与当代孕产妇死亡原因识别模型:一项基于人群的研究
BJOG. 2025 Oct;132(11):1689-1696. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18298. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Temporal Changes in the Contribution of Chronic Disease to Maternal Mortality in the United States.美国慢性病对孕产妇死亡贡献的时间变化
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2025 Aug;39(6):527-539. doi: 10.1111/ppe.70034. Epub 2025 Jun 8.
3
Trends in Maternal, Fetal, and Infant Mortality in the US, 2000-2023.
2000 - 2023年美国孕产妇、胎儿及婴儿死亡率趋势
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0440.
4
Age-related disparities in national maternal mortality trends: A population-based study.全国孕产妇死亡率趋势中的年龄相关差异:一项基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0316578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316578. eCollection 2025.
5
Data have consequences-Centring equity in the maternal mortality surveillance debate.数据会产生影响——将公平性置于孕产妇死亡率监测辩论的核心。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2025 May;39(4):311-313. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13138. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
6
Spatiotemporal patterns and surveillance artifacts in maternal mortality in the United States: a population-based study.美国孕产妇死亡率的时空模式与监测假象:一项基于人群的研究
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Oct 4;39:100902. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100902. eCollection 2024 Nov.
7
Safeguarding the Health of Mothers: A Public Health of Consequence, July 2024.保障母亲健康:一项具有重要意义的公共卫生工作,2024年7月
Am J Public Health. 2024 Jul;114(7):672-673. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307716.
8
Pregnancy-associated mortality due to cardiovascular disease: Impact of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.妊娠相关心血管疾病死亡:妊娠高血压疾病的影响。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;38(3):204-215. doi: 10.1111/ppe.13055. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
9
Characteristics of Maternal Mortality Missed by Vital Statistics in Hong Kong, 2000-2019.2000-2019 年香港生命统计数据漏报的孕产妇死亡特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e230429. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0429.
10
Trend and causes of maternal death, stillbirth and neonatal death over seven decades in Hong Kong.香港七十年来孕产妇死亡、死产和新生儿死亡的趋势及原因。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Jul 6;26:100523. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100523. eCollection 2022 Sep.