Suppr超能文献

美国死亡证明中“怀孕”勾选框的价值和弊端——对新发布的 2018 年孕产妇死亡率数据的影响。

Value and disvalue of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates in the United States-impact on newly released 2018 maternal mortality data.

机构信息

Departments of International Health and Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Department of Family Science, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD; Maryland Population Research Center, College Park, MD.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):393.e1-393.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.046. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

Abstract

Maternal mortality is a sentinel health indicator. To improve the identification of maternal deaths, a pregnancy question was added during the 2003 revision of the US standard death certificate. Its adoption across all states in the United States took 16 years (2003-2018), and therefore the National Center for Health Statistics did not provide the national maternal mortality rate between 2007 and 2018. During this time, researchers raised questions about the accuracy of the checkbox information, particularly regarding its contribution to overreporting of maternal deaths in the United States. Checkbox errors were especially evident for women aged >40 years and for nonspecific causes of death. In January 2020, the NCHS resumed the reporting of maternal mortality data and provided the 2018 figures using a new coding method (ie, the 2018 method). Despite internal analyses suggesting the presence of both high false positive and high false negative pregnancy checkbox errors, the National Center for Health Statistics reported identification of 658 maternal deaths nationwide and a maternal mortality rate of 17.4 deaths per 100,000 live births for 2018. The 2018 coding method restricts the entry of checkbox information to decedents aged 10-44 years; the information cannot, therefore, be entered for women aged >45 years when no pregnancy-related cause of death information is indicated on the death certificate. Reported deaths with a pregnancy or obstetrical condition entered in the cause of death section of the death certificate continue to be coded as maternal deaths regardless of age. The 2018 method likely corrects errors introduced by the use of the checkbox for women aged >45 years, but whether it provides accurate maternal mortality figures remains unknown. We call for efforts to urgently and systematically validate the pregnancy checkbox information. Post hoc coding adjustments cannot substitute for providing accurate and actionable maternal mortality data.

摘要

孕产妇死亡率是一个重要的健康指标。为了提高孕产妇死亡的识别率,美国在 2003 年修订标准死亡证明时增加了一个妊娠问题。该问题在美国所有州的采用历时 16 年(2003-2018 年),因此国家卫生统计中心在 2007 年至 2018 年期间没有提供全国孕产妇死亡率数据。在此期间,研究人员对勾选框信息的准确性提出了质疑,特别是其对美国孕产妇死亡报告偏高的影响。勾选框错误在年龄 >40 岁的妇女和死因不明确的妇女中尤为明显。2020 年 1 月,NCHS 恢复了孕产妇死亡率数据的报告,并使用新的编码方法(即 2018 年方法)提供了 2018 年的数据。尽管内部分析表明,妊娠勾选框存在高假阳性和高假阴性错误,但国家卫生统计中心报告了全国范围内 658 例孕产妇死亡,2018 年每 10 万例活产的孕产妇死亡率为 17.4 例。2018 年的编码方法将勾选框信息的输入限制在 10-44 岁的死者;因此,如果死亡证明上没有与妊娠相关的死因信息,则不能为年龄 >45 岁的妇女输入勾选框信息。死亡证明死因部分中报告的有妊娠或产科情况的死亡继续被编码为孕产妇死亡,而不论死者年龄。2018 年的方法可能纠正了对年龄 >45 岁妇女使用勾选框带来的错误,但它是否提供了准确的孕产妇死亡率数据仍不得而知。我们呼吁紧急和系统地验证妊娠勾选框信息。事后编码调整不能替代提供准确和可行的孕产妇死亡率数据。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验