Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurociências, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais (MG) 31270-901, Brazil.
Laboratório Interdisciplinar de Investigação Médica, Faculdade de Medicina da UFMG, Belo Horizonte, MG 30130-100, Brazil.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2020 Feb;26(2):163-171. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000973. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
Cognitive tests of inhibitory control show variable results for the differential diagnosis between behavioural variant of Frontotemporal Dementia (bvFTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). We compared the diagnostic accuracies of tests of inhibitory control and of a behavioural questionnaire, to distinguish bvFTD from AD.
Three groups of participants were enrolled: 27 bvFTD patients, 25 AD patients, and 24 healthy controls. Groups were matched for gender, education, and socio-economic level. Participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of inhibitory control, including Hayling Test, Stroop, the Five Digits Test (FDT) and the Delay Discounting Task (DDT). Caregivers completed the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale 11th version (BIS-11).
bvFTD and AD groups showed no difference in the tasks of inhibitory control, while the caregiver questionnaire revealed that bvFTD patients were significantly more impulsive (BIS-11: bvFTD 76.1+9.5, AD 62.9+13, p < .001).
Neuropsychological tests of inhibitory control failed to distinguish bvFTD from AD. On the contrary, impulsivity caregiver-completed questionnaire provided good distinction between bvFTD and AD. These results highlight the current limits of cognitive measures of inhibitory control for the differential diagnosis between bvFTD and AD, whereas questionnaire information appears more reliable and in line with clinical diagnostics.
抑制控制的认知测试在行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)的鉴别诊断中显示出不同的结果。我们比较了抑制控制测试和行为问卷的诊断准确性,以区分 bvFTD 和 AD。
招募了三组参与者:27 名 bvFTD 患者、25 名 AD 患者和 24 名健康对照者。组间匹配性别、教育和社会经济水平。参与者接受了抑制控制的全面神经心理学评估,包括海灵测试、Stroop 测试、五位数测试(FDT)和延迟折扣任务(DDT)。护理人员完成了 11 版巴瑞特冲动量表(BIS-11)。
bvFTD 和 AD 组在抑制控制任务中没有差异,而护理人员问卷显示 bvFTD 患者明显更冲动(BIS-11:bvFTD 76.1+9.5,AD 62.9+13,p<0.001)。
抑制控制的神经心理学测试未能区分 bvFTD 和 AD。相反,冲动性护理人员完成的问卷能够很好地区分 bvFTD 和 AD。这些结果突出了目前抑制控制认知测量在 bvFTD 和 AD 鉴别诊断中的局限性,而问卷信息似乎更可靠,更符合临床诊断。