• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 Kannada 语的嗓音障碍严重度感知等级,声学嗓音质量分析 02.03 版的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language.

机构信息

Department of Speech-Language pathology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

Department of Speech-Language pathology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):159.e11-159.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Sep 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.010
PMID:31543357
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) has been reported to be a sensitive tool for discriminating between the normal and dysphonic voices, however, there is a dearth of research focused on investigating the diagnostic accuracy of AVQI in discriminating across the perceptual categories of dysphonia severity ie, slight, moderate, and severe. Hence, the present study is a preliminary attempt to document the AVQI across the degrees of dysphonia severity and to verify whether the AVQI can discriminate across these degrees of perceptual dysphonia severity.

METHOD

A total of 71 dysphonic samples extracted from the clinical database of the institute and 19 prospectively recorded normophonic samples consisting of sustained vowel /a/ and a sentence from a standardized Kannada passage served as input data. These 90 samples were categorized into four categories based on the overall grade of perceptual dysphonia (G) as normal, slight, moderate, or severe by three experienced speech language pathologists in a randomized and double-blinded manner, which served as the ground truth. The AVQI was calculated from the samples using Praat version 6.0.40 and the AVQI script version 2.03.

RESULTS

The Spearman's correlation test revealed a positive correlation between the G and the AVQI (r = 0.67; P < 0.001). The Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis revealed that the AVQI could accurately discriminate across the perceptual subcategories of dysphonia.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study revealed that AVQI is a robust multiparametric measure which can accurately discriminate across the subcategories of the perceptual dysphonia severity with reasonable precision. Further, the AVQI is also shown to be promising in evaluating the signals with higher levels of aperiodicity such as severe hoarse voice quality.

摘要

背景

声学语音质量指数 (AVQI) 已被报道为区分正常和发声障碍声音的敏感工具,然而,缺乏研究集中在调查 AVQI 在区分不同程度的发声障碍严重程度即轻度、中度和重度方面的诊断准确性。因此,本研究初步尝试记录了 AVQI 在不同程度的发声障碍中的表现,并验证了 AVQI 是否可以区分这些不同程度的感知性发声障碍严重程度。

方法

本研究从研究所的临床数据库中提取了 71 个发声障碍样本,以及 19 个前瞻性记录的正常声音样本,包括持续的元音 /a/ 和一段来自标准卡纳达语文章的句子,作为输入数据。这些 90 个样本由三名经验丰富的言语语言病理学家以随机和双盲的方式根据整体感知性发声障碍程度(G)分为正常、轻度、中度或重度四个类别,作为ground truth。使用 Praat 版本 6.0.40 和 AVQI 脚本版本 2.03 从样本中计算 AVQI。

结果

Spearman 相关检验显示 G 与 AVQI 之间存在正相关(r=0.67; P<0.001)。接收器操作特性分析显示 AVQI 可以准确区分发声障碍的感知亚类。

结论

本研究的结果表明,AVQI 是一种稳健的多参数测量工具,可以准确区分感知性发声障碍严重程度的亚类,具有合理的精度。此外,AVQI 也显示出在评估具有更高非周期性水平的信号方面具有潜力,例如严重的嘶哑音质。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language.基于 Kannada 语的嗓音障碍严重度感知等级,声学嗓音质量分析 02.03 版的诊断准确性。
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):159.e11-159.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
2
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.验证法语版声学语音质量指数 03.01。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e11-646.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
3
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
4
Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population.比较和验证印度南部人群的嗓音障碍指数量表 2 版和 3 版。
J Voice. 2024 Sep;38(5):1248.e1-1248.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
5
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.韩语嗓音障碍指数量表的验证。
J Voice. 2019 Nov;33(6):948.e1-948.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.嗓音障碍严重程度指数与声学嗓音质量指数在区分正常嗓音和嗓音障碍嗓音方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
7
Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.《土耳其语版声学语音质量指数 02.06 版本的验证和重测信度》
J Voice. 2022 Sep;36(5):736.e25-736.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
8
Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.声学语音质量指数作为一种潜在的语音筛查工具。
J Voice. 2021 Mar;35(2):226-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
9
[Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Russian language].[俄语版声学嗓音质量指数的验证]
Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2022;87(5):34-38. doi: 10.17116/otorino20228705134.
10
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language.《嗓音声学质量指数量表(03.01 版)》的巴西葡萄牙语验证。
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):160.e15-160.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.024. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Gender on Acoustic Voice Quality Index 02.03 and Dysphonia Severity Index in Indian Normophonic Adults.性别对印度正常发声成年人的嗓音声学质量指数02.03及发声障碍严重程度指数的影响
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5052-5059. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02712-8. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
2
A Comparative Study on Acoustic Voice Quality Index Between the Subjects with Spasmodic Dysphonia and Normophonia.痉挛性发声障碍患者与发声正常者的嗓音声学质量指数对比研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):4927-4932. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02448-5. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
3
[Current methods of acoustic analysis of voice: a review].
[当前嗓音声学分析方法综述]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Dec;36(12):966-970;976. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.12.016.