• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《土耳其语版声学语音质量指数 02.06 版本的验证和重测信度》

Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.

机构信息

Department of Speech and Language Therapy; Anadolu University Faculty of Health Sciences, Eskisehir, TURKEY.

European Institute for ORL-HNS, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, GZA Sint-Augustinus, Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Faculty of Education, Health & Social Work, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; School of Logopedics, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium; Phonanium, Lokeren, Belgium.

出版信息

J Voice. 2022 Sep;36(5):736.e25-736.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.021
PMID:32962941
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was to investigate the validity (both concurrent and diagnostic) and test-retest reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) version 2 (AVQI 02.06) in Turkish speaking population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and fifty five native Turkish subjects with normal voices (n = 128) and with voice disorders (n = 127) were asked to sustain the vowel [a:] and read aloud the Turkish phonetically balanced text. To determine the test-retest reliability of AVQI, 20 dysphonic (ie, around 15% of the group), and 20 normophonic (ie, around 15% of the group) were reassessed 15 minutes after the first AVQI determination. A three middle seconds of sustained vowel [a:] and a sentence with 25 syllables was concatenated, and AVQI analysis was conducted. The auditory-perceptual evaluation was performed by five experienced raters with Grade (G) from GRBAS Protocol.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant correlation between AVQI scores and auditory-perceptual evaluation of overall voice quality (r = 0.717, P < 0.001). AVQI gave a threshold of 2.98 for the dysphonic voice. The values of intraclass correlation coefficient with two-way mixed-effects model, single-measures type, absolute agreement definition showed an excellent test-retest reliability for AVQI in Turkish language (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.986).

CONCLUSION

AVQI v.02.06 is a valid and robust tool in differentiating dysphonic and normal voice, and has excellent test-retest reliability in Turkish language.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨土耳其语人群中声门关闭不全指数(AVQI)版本 2(AVQI 02.06)的效度(同时和诊断)和重测信度。

材料和方法

255 名母语为土耳其语、声音正常的受试者(n=128)和有嗓音障碍的受试者(n=127)被要求持续发[a:]元音并朗读土耳其语语音平衡文本。为了确定 AVQI 的重测信度,对 20 名发音障碍者(即组内的 15%)和 20 名发音正常者(即组内的 15%)在第一次 AVQI 测定后 15 分钟进行了重新评估。将持续发 3 秒钟的[a:]元音和包含 25 个音节的句子拼接起来,进行 AVQI 分析。采用 5 位有经验的评分者,使用 GRBAS 协议中的 G 级对听觉感知评估进行评分。

结果

AVQI 评分与总体嗓音质量的听觉感知评估呈显著正相关(r=0.717,P<0.001)。AVQI 对发音障碍的嗓音有 2.98 的阈值。采用双向混合效应模型、单测量类型、绝对一致性定义的组内相关系数显示,AVQI 在土耳其语中的重测信度非常好(组内相关系数=0.986)。

结论

AVQI v.02.06 是一种区分发音障碍和正常嗓音的有效且可靠的工具,在土耳其语中具有极好的重测信度。

相似文献

1
Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.《土耳其语版声学语音质量指数 02.06 版本的验证和重测信度》
J Voice. 2022 Sep;36(5):736.e25-736.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.08.021. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
2
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.立陶宛语声学语音质量指数的验证。
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e1-257.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.验证法语版声学语音质量指数 03.01。
J Voice. 2020 Jul;34(4):646.e11-646.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
4
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.嗓音障碍严重程度指数与声学嗓音质量指数在区分正常嗓音和嗓音障碍嗓音方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.韩语嗓音障碍指数量表的验证。
J Voice. 2019 Nov;33(6):948.e1-948.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
6
Diagnostic Accuracy of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.03 in Discriminating across the Perceptual Degrees of Dysphonia Severity in Kannada Language.基于 Kannada 语的嗓音障碍严重度感知等级,声学嗓音质量分析 02.03 版的诊断准确性。
J Voice. 2021 Jan;35(1):159.e11-159.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
7
Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.验证韩国人群中的嗓音障碍指数 3.01 版和声扰指数。
J Voice. 2021 Jul;35(4):660.e9-660.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
8
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 in Turkish.土耳其语版03.01声学嗓音质量指数的验证
J Voice. 2024 Oct 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2024.08.030.
9
Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.测量韩语语音发声障碍严重程度的听觉感知和声学方法
J Voice. 2016 Sep;30(5):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
10
Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) Version 03.01 in Italian.验证意大利语版的声学语音质量指数(AVQI)第 03.01 版。
J Voice. 2023 Jul;37(4):631.e1-631.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.029. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The Rapidly Evolving Scenario of Acoustic Voice Analysis in Otolaryngology.耳鼻咽喉科中快速发展的嗓音声学分析情况
Cureus. 2024 Nov 11;16(11):e73491. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73491. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Reliability of Universal-Platform-Based Application in AVQI Measurements Captured with Different Smartphones.基于通用平台的应用程序在不同智能手机捕获的AVQI测量中的可靠性。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 18;12(12):4119. doi: 10.3390/jcm12124119.