Kang Eun Young, Shin Mikyung
Yongin University, Graduate School of Education, 134 Cheoin-gu, Yongin, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea 17092; telephone: 82-31-8020-3693;
Jeonju University, Department of Secondary Special Education, 303 Cheonjam-ro, Wansan-gu, Jeonbuk, Republic of Korea 55069; telephone: 82-10-2409-7177.
Read Writ Q. 2019;35(3):179-192. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2018.1521758. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the contribution of decoding and reading fluency on reading comprehension and how it differs across different types of comprehension measures among fourth-grade students with reading difficulties and disabilities ( age = 9.8, = 0.6). Results indicated that decoding and reading fluency predicted 8.1% to 43.3% of the variance in reading comprehension. Decoding and reading fluency accounted for 8.1% of the variance associated with performance on the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Comprehension Test, 22.5% for the Test of Silent Reading Efficiency and Comprehension (TOSREC), and 43.3% for the Woodcock-Johnson III Passage Comprehension subtest (WJ3-PC). Decoding explained -0.2% of the variance for the Gates-MacGinitie, 3.1% for the TOSREC, and 15.1% for the WJ3-PC subtest. Reading fluency individually accounted for 3.9% of the variance for the Gates-MacGinitie, 4.5% for the TOSREC, and 1.9% for the WJ3-PC. We discuss the limitations and practical implications of these findings.
本研究的目的是调查解码和阅读流畅性对阅读理解的贡献，以及在有阅读困难和障碍的四年级学生（年龄=9.8，标准差=0.6）中，这种贡献在不同类型的阅读理解测量中是如何不同的。结果表明，解码和阅读流畅性预测了阅读理解中8.1%至43.3%的方差。解码和阅读流畅性在盖茨-麦金蒂阅读理解测试成绩相关的方差中占8.1%，在默读效率与理解测试（TOSREC）中占22.5%，在伍德科克-约翰逊III篇章理解子测试（WJ3-PC）中占43.3%。解码对盖茨-麦金蒂测试的方差解释率为-0.2%，对TOSREC为3.1%，对WJ3-PC子测试为15.1%。阅读流畅性单独对盖茨-麦金蒂测试的方差解释率为3.9%，对TOSREC为4.5%，对WJ3-PC为1.9%。我们讨论了这些发现的局限性和实际意义。
