The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.
J Learn Disabil. 2021 May-Jun;54(3):155-169. doi: 10.1177/0022219420932139. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
Reading comprehension tests vary in format and characteristics, which may influence the extent to which component skills are involved in test performance. With students in Grades 6 to 8 with reading difficulties, dominance analyses examined the differential importance of component reading and language skills (word- and text-reading fluency, vocabulary, listening comprehension, and working memory) on several standardized tests of reading comprehension: , 4th edition (GMRT), , , 5th edition (GORT-5), and the (TOSREC). Students' word- and text-reading fluency skills were generally the most dominant predictors of performance on most reading comprehension tests, especially those with a time limit (GMRT and TOSREC). Listening comprehension was most important on the GORT-5, a test in which students read passages orally and listen to questions read by an examiner. Working memory was the least important component skill across the reading comprehension tests. Overall, results were consistent with previous work indicating that reading comprehension measures vary with regard to the skills or knowledge sources that are most important for test performance and extend these findings to struggling adolescent readers. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
阅读理解测试在格式和特点上有所不同,这可能会影响到参与测试表现的各个组成部分技能的程度。对于阅读困难的 6 到 8 年级学生,优势分析考察了组成阅读和语言技能(单词和文本阅读流畅性、词汇、听力理解和工作记忆)对几种标准化阅读理解测试的不同重要性:,第 4 版(GMRT),,,第 5 版(GORT-5)和(TOSREC)。学生的单词和文本阅读流畅性技能通常是大多数阅读理解测试表现的最主要预测因素,尤其是那些有时间限制的测试(GMRT 和 TOSREC)。听力理解在 GORT-5 上最为重要,这是一项学生口头阅读文章并听考官阅读问题的测试。工作记忆是阅读理解测试中最不重要的组成部分技能。总体而言,结果与之前的研究一致,表明阅读理解测试在对于测试表现最重要的技能或知识来源方面存在差异,并将这些发现扩展到挣扎中的青少年读者。讨论了对研究和实践的影响。