• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在跨文化和跨学科团队中培养创造力:VICTORY模型。

Fostering Creativity in Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Teams: The VICTORY Model.

作者信息

Tang Min

机构信息

Institute for Creativity and Innovation, University of Applied Management, Ismaning, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 4;10:2020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02020. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02020
PMID:31543855
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6739593/
Abstract

Teams are pervasive in the history of mankind. Particularly in our fast-growing modern society, teams composed of members from different cultures and disciplines are quite often used at the workplace. Though widely used, the effectiveness of teams is inconsistent. Meta-analyses report a double-edged effect of diversity on creativity and innovation, suggesting that diversity needs to be tactfully managed if we want to leverage the creative potential of teams. The current paper strives to meet this challenge and makes recommendations on how to foster creativity in intercultural and interdisciplinary teams. It discusses the concepts of teams vs. groups and creativity vs. innovation. Drawing upon sociocultural theories of creativity and innovation, particularly literature reviews and meta-analyses, this paper attempts to identify non-cognitive, cognitive and environmental enablers of team creativity. The VICTORY model offers a summary of these enablers, as it focuses on team (T) and synthesizes both non-cognitive (Vision, Openness, Risk-taking, Yes-I-Can Mindset) and cognitive (Ideation, Combination) antecedents of team creativity. Yet it is only through the combination and integration of environmental factors (including communication, collaboration, and support, among others) that the effect of these antecedents can be fully realized.

摘要

团队在人类历史中无处不在。特别是在快速发展的现代社会,由来自不同文化和学科的成员组成的团队在工作场所经常被使用。尽管团队被广泛使用,但其有效性并不一致。元分析报告了多样性对创造力和创新的双刃剑效应,这表明如果我们想利用团队的创造潜力,就需要巧妙地管理多样性。本文致力于应对这一挑战,并就如何在跨文化和跨学科团队中培养创造力提出建议。它讨论了团队与群体以及创造力与创新的概念。借鉴创造力和创新的社会文化理论,特别是文献综述和元分析,本文试图确定团队创造力的非认知、认知和环境促进因素。VICTORY模型总结了这些促进因素,因为它关注团队(T),并综合了团队创造力的非认知(愿景、开放性、冒险精神、我能行心态)和认知(构思、组合)前因。然而,只有通过环境因素(包括沟通、协作和支持等)的结合与整合,这些前因的效果才能得到充分实现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd6/6739593/9ead73352a65/fpsyg-10-02020-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd6/6739593/9ead73352a65/fpsyg-10-02020-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9bd6/6739593/9ead73352a65/fpsyg-10-02020-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Fostering Creativity in Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Teams: The VICTORY Model.在跨文化和跨学科团队中培养创造力:VICTORY模型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 4;10:2020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02020. eCollection 2019.
2
Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential.促进团队创造力:换位思考是挖掘多样性潜力的关键。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Sep;97(5):982-96. doi: 10.1037/a0029159. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
3
Shared Adversity Increases Team Creativity Through Fostering Supportive Interaction.共同的逆境通过促进支持性互动来提高团队创造力。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 23;9:2309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02309. eCollection 2018.
4
"Going out" of the box: Close intercultural friendships and romantic relationships spark creativity, workplace innovation, and entrepreneurship.走出固有思维:密切的跨文化友谊和浪漫关系能激发创造力、推动职场创新和创业。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jul;102(7):1091-1108. doi: 10.1037/apl0000212. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Moderating effects of task interdependence on interaction behaviours and creativity for nursing students on interdisciplinary teams.调节任务相互依赖性对跨学科团队中护理学生的互动行为和创造力的影响。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Jan;78(1):131-141. doi: 10.1111/jan.14961. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
6
The interplay of diversity training and diversity beliefs on team creativity in nationality diverse teams.多元化培训与多元化信念对国籍多元化团队中团队创造力的相互作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Sep;100(5):1456-67. doi: 10.1037/apl0000013. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Innovation Labs.创新实验室中共享领导力的出现。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 12;12:685167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685167. eCollection 2021.
8
Positive and Negative Supervisor Development Feedback, Team Harmonious Innovation Passion and Team Creativity.积极与消极的主管发展反馈、团队和谐创新热情与团队创造力。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 2;12:681910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.681910. eCollection 2021.
9
Entrepreneurial Team Knowledge Diversity and Creativity: A Multilevel Analysis of Knowledge Sharing, Individual Creativity, and Team Creativity.创业团队知识多样性与创造力:知识共享、个体创造力和团队创造力的多层次分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 1;12:717756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717756. eCollection 2021.
10
Creative Self-Efficacy: An Exploration of Its Antecedents, Consequences, and Applied Implications.创造性自我效能感:对其前因、后果及应用意义的探索
J Psychol. 2016;150(2):175-95. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2015.1051498. Epub 2015 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
The reciprocal relationship between openness and creativity: from neurobiology to multicultural environments.开放性与创造力之间的相互关系:从神经生物学至多元文化环境
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 11;14:1235348. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1235348. eCollection 2023.
2
Mind the gender gap: The social neuroscience of belonging.关注性别差异:归属感的社会神经科学。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Apr 5;17:1094830. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1094830. eCollection 2023.
3
In search of mediators of leadership behavior to Team Creativity in Team Start-ups.

本文引用的文献

1
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis.元分析中的发表偏倚检验:一项元元分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0215052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215052. eCollection 2019.
2
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.提高工作团队的效率。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Dec;7(3):77-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x. Epub 2006 Dec 1.
3
Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential.促进团队创造力:换位思考是挖掘多样性潜力的关键。
探寻团队创业中领导行为对团队创造力的中介因素。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 3;13:951603. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.951603. eCollection 2022.
4
Orde ab Chao Method for Disruptive Innovations Creation (With COVID-19 Pandemic Case Application).用于颠覆性创新创造的奥尔德·阿·曹方法(附新冠疫情案例应用)
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 11;11:581968. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.581968. eCollection 2020.
5
Compulsory Citizenship Behavior and Employee Creativity: Creative Self-Efficacy as a Mediator and Negative Affect as a Moderator.强制公民行为与员工创造力:以创造性自我效能感为中介变量、消极情绪为调节变量
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 21;11:1640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01640. eCollection 2020.
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Sep;97(5):982-96. doi: 10.1037/a0029159. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
4
Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research.工作中创新的团队层面预测因素:跨越三十年研究的综合元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1128-45. doi: 10.1037/a0015978.
5
Work group diversity.工作团队多样性。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:515-41. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546.
6
A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity.对科学与艺术创造力中个性的一项荟萃分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1998;2(4):290-309. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5.
7
Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.工作团队多样性与团队绩效:一个整合模型及研究议程。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(6):1008-22. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008.
8
Group performance and decision making.团队绩效与决策制定。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:623-55. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009.
9
Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis.任务冲突与关系冲突、团队绩效及团队成员满意度:一项元分析
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Aug;88(4):741-9. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741.
10
Ancient Pygmalion joins contemporary management: a meta-analysis of the result.古代皮格马利翁效应与当代管理:结果的荟萃分析
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):314-22. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.314.