• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对高风险少数族裔人群定制的健康食品标签比通用标签更有效地促进健康选择。

Healthy Food Labels Tailored to a High-Risk, Minority Population More Effectively Promote Healthy Choices than Generic Labels.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.

Rosebud Food Sovereignty Initiative, REDCO, Mission, SD 57555, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2019 Sep 22;11(10):2272. doi: 10.3390/nu11102272.

DOI:10.3390/nu11102272
PMID:31546697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6835742/
Abstract

The decades-long increase in obesity in the US has led to a number of policies aimed at improving diets, which are thought to play a significant role in obesity. Many of these policies seek to influence individuals' behaviors. Front-of-package labels providing salient, easily interpretable information to consumers have exhibited promise in helping people identify and choose healthier foods. However, behavioral economics may offer an opportunity to enhance label effectiveness. Tailoring labels to high-risk communities, including minority and rural populations, which have higher rates of diet-related diseases than the overall population, may increase the label's effectiveness. We conducted a choice experiment with supermarket shoppers on a rural American Indian reservation to test labels tailored to the local population relative to a generic label, which had previously been identified as highly effective in the general population. Results show that while the generic label continues to be quite effective in encouraging healthier choices, the label that is tailored to the local community is more effective, resulting in a marked increase in the premium shoppers were willing to pay for a healthy item. Tailoring healthy food labeling systems using insights from behavioral economics may increase their effectiveness.

摘要

美国肥胖症的发病率在过去几十年中持续上升,这导致了许多旨在改善饮食的政策的出台,这些政策被认为在肥胖症中起着重要作用。这些政策中的许多都试图影响个人的行为。在包装正面提供突出、易于理解的信息给消费者的标签已经显示出了帮助人们识别和选择更健康食品的潜力。然而,行为经济学可能提供了增强标签效果的机会。针对高危人群(包括少数民族和农村人口)定制标签,这些人群的饮食相关疾病发病率高于整个人口,可能会提高标签的效果。我们在美国印第安人保留地的一家超市进行了一项选择实验,以测试针对当地人口的标签与通用标签的效果,通用标签在普通人群中被证明非常有效。结果表明,虽然通用标签在鼓励更健康的选择方面仍然非常有效,但针对当地社区的标签效果更好,这导致愿意为健康食品支付更高溢价的购物者数量显著增加。利用行为经济学的见解来定制健康食品标签系统可能会提高其效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e08b/6835742/9a66a92e4349/nutrients-11-02272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e08b/6835742/9a66a92e4349/nutrients-11-02272-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e08b/6835742/9a66a92e4349/nutrients-11-02272-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Healthy Food Labels Tailored to a High-Risk, Minority Population More Effectively Promote Healthy Choices than Generic Labels.针对高风险少数族裔人群定制的健康食品标签比通用标签更有效地促进健康选择。
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 22;11(10):2272. doi: 10.3390/nu11102272.
2
Front-of-package food labels: A narrative review.包装食品标签:叙述性评价。
Appetite. 2020 Jan 1;144:104485. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104485. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
3
The impact of interpretive and reductive front-of-pack labels on food choice and willingness to pay.包装正面的解释性和简化标签对食物选择及支付意愿的影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Dec 19;14(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0628-2.
4
Healthy choice label does not substantially improve consumers' ability to select healthier cereals: results of an online experiment.健康选择标签并没有显著提高消费者选择更健康麦片的能力:一项在线实验的结果。
Br J Nutr. 2019 Jun;121(11):1313-1320. doi: 10.1017/S0007114519000448. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
5
Which Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Is Better? The Influence of Front-of-Package Nutrition Label Type on Consumers' Healthy Food Purchase Behavior.哪种包装营养标签更好?包装营养标签类型对消费者购买健康食品行为的影响。
Nutrients. 2023 May 16;15(10):2326. doi: 10.3390/nu15102326.
6
Attitude and Behavior Factors Associated with Front-of-Package Label Use with Label Users Making Accurate Product Nutrition Assessments.与标签使用者准确评估产品营养状况相关的与态度和行为因素有关的包装正面标签使用。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 May;118(5):904-912. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
Consumers' Response to an On-Shelf Nutrition Labelling System in Supermarkets: Evidence to Inform Policy and Practice.消费者对超市货架营养标签系统的反应:为政策和实践提供信息的证据
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):494-534. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12277.
8
Comparison of two front-of-package nutrition labeling schemes, and their explanation, on consumers' perception of product healthfulness and food choice.两种包装正面营养标签方案及其解释对消费者对产品健康感知和食品选择的比较。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.027. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.不同包装正面营养标签对消费者购买意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验
Am J Prev Med. 2016 May;50(5):627-636. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.10.020. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
10
Retail-based healthy food point-of-decision prompts (PDPs) increase healthy food choices in a rural, low-income, minority community.基于零售的健康食品决策点提示(PDPs)增加了农村、低收入、少数民族社区的健康食品选择。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0207792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207792. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Personalizing product sets to individual health priorities increases the healthfulness of hypothetical food choices in US adults.根据美国成年人的个人健康优先事项来定制产品组合,可提高其假设性食物选择的健康程度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 7;15(1):7981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92784-1.
2
Nutrition in Times of Crisis: A Qualitative Study in Siargao Island, Philippines, during the COVID-19 Pandemic.危机时期的营养:菲律宾锡亚高岛在新冠疫情期间的定性研究
Acta Med Philipp. 2023 May 29;57(5):5-15. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.4963. eCollection 2023.
3
The impact of health and environmental messaging with and without product filtering in complex retail markets: the case of pulses.

本文引用的文献

1
Retail-based healthy food point-of-decision prompts (PDPs) increase healthy food choices in a rural, low-income, minority community.基于零售的健康食品决策点提示(PDPs)增加了农村、低收入、少数民族社区的健康食品选择。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 12;13(12):e0207792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207792. eCollection 2018.
2
Trends in Obesity and Severe Obesity Prevalence in US Youth and Adults by Sex and Age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016.美国青少年和成年人按性别和年龄划分的肥胖和重度肥胖流行趋势,2007-2008 年至 2015-2016 年。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 24;319(16):1723-1725. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3060.
3
Prevalence of Obesity Among Adults, by Household Income and Education - United States, 2011-2014.
在复杂零售市场中有无产品筛选情况下健康与环境信息传递的影响:以豆类为例
Front Nutr. 2024 Sep 25;11:1454271. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1454271. eCollection 2024.
4
The impact of the consumer and neighbourhood food environment on dietary intake and obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review of causal impact studies.消费者和社区食品环境对饮食摄入和肥胖相关结果的影响:因果关系影响研究的系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;299:114879. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114879. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
5
A Scoping Review of the Use of Indigenous Food Sovereignty Principles for Intervention and Future Directions.对运用本土食物主权原则进行干预及未来方向的范围综述
Curr Dev Nutr. 2021 Jul 1;5(7):nzab093. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab093. eCollection 2021 Jul.
6
Effects of food policy actions on Indigenous Peoples' nutrition-related outcomes: a systematic review.食物政策行动对原住民营养相关结局的影响:系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002442.
7
The Multifaceted Dimensions of Food Choice and Nutrition.食物选择与营养的多重视角。
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 16;12(2):502. doi: 10.3390/nu12020502.
按家庭收入和教育程度划分的美国成年人肥胖患病率,2011 - 2014年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Dec 22;66(50):1369-1373. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6650a1.
4
Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.美国的结构性种族主义和健康不平等:证据与干预。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1453-1463. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X.
5
Impact of schoolchildren's involvement in the design process on the effectiveness of healthy food promotion materials.学童参与设计过程对健康食品推广材料有效性的影响。
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Mar 23;6:246-250. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.03.010. eCollection 2017 Jun.
6
Trends in Obesity Prevalence Among Children and Adolescents in the United States, 1988-1994 Through 2013-2014.1988 - 1994年至2013 - 2014年美国儿童和青少年肥胖患病率趋势
JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2292-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6361.
7
Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014.2005年至2014年美国成年人肥胖趋势
JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2284-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6458.
8
Economic constraints on taste formation and the true cost of healthy eating.口味形成的经济制约因素与健康饮食的真实成本。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jan;148:34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.025. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
9
An economy of scales: A selective review of obesity's economic causes, consequences, and solutions.规模经济:对肥胖的经济成因、后果及解决方案的选择性综述。
J Health Econ. 2015 Sep;43:244-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
10
Nonprice incentives and energy conservation.非价格激励措施与节能
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 10;112(6):E510-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401880112. Epub 2015 Jan 12.