Maudrie Tara L, Colón-Ramos Uriyoán, Harper Kaitlyn M, Jock Brittany W, Gittelsohn Joel
Department of International Health, Center for Human Nutrition, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Global Health, Department of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Milken Institute School of Public Health at The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2021 Jul 1;5(7):nzab093. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzab093. eCollection 2021 Jul.
Indigenous food sovereignty (IFS) represents a community-led movement with potential to reduce health inequities, but no scoping review of the impact of taking an IFS approach on intervention research has been conducted. This review sought to: ) describe intervention studies that employ IFS principles, and ) describe the impact of studies using IFS principles on food access, eating patterns, diet quality, physical activity, and health. Through a literature review, 4 IFS principles were identified: ) community ownership, ) inclusion of traditional food knowledge, ) inclusion and promotion of cultural foods, and ) environmental/intervention sustainability. Twenty intervention studies published between January 1, 2000 and February 5, 2020 were included. Most of the studies that scored high in IFS principles saw a positive impact on diet. This review found evidence supporting the value of IFS principles in the development, implementation, and evaluation of health interventions for Indigenous communities.
本土食物主权（IFS）代表了一场由社区主导的运动，具有减少健康不平等的潜力，但尚未对采用IFS方法对干预研究的影响进行范围界定审查。本综述旨在：（1）描述采用IFS原则的干预研究，以及（2）描述使用IFS原则的研究对食物获取、饮食模式、饮食质量、身体活动和健康的影响。通过文献综述，确定了4项IFS原则：（1）社区所有权，（2）纳入传统食物知识，（3）纳入和推广文化食物，以及（4）环境/干预可持续性。纳入了2000年1月1日至2020年2月5日期间发表的20项干预研究。大多数在IFS原则方面得分较高的研究对饮食产生了积极影响。本综述发现有证据支持IFS原则在为本土社区制定、实施和评估健康干预措施方面的价值。
