State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, PR China.
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, PR China.
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Nov;114:103442. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103442. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
Electroencephalographic (EEG) signals are constantly superimposed with biological artifacts. In particular, spontaneous blinks represent a recurrent event that cannot be easily avoided. The main goal of this paper is to present a new algorithm for blink correction (ABC) that is adaptive to inter- and intra-subject variability. The whole process of designing a Brain-Computer Interface (BCI)-based EEG experiment is highlighted. From sample size determination to classification, a mixture of the standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) for source localization and time restriction, followed by Riemannian geometry classifiers is featured. Comparison between ABC and the commonly-used Independent Component Analysis (ICA) for blinks removal shows a net amelioration with ABC. With the same pipeline using uncorrected data as a reference, ABC improves classification by 5.38% in average, whereas ICA deteriorates by -2.67%. Furthermore, while ABC accurately reconstructs blink-free data from simulated data, ICA yields a potential difference up to 200% from the original blink-free signal and an increased variance of 30.42%. Finally, ABC's major advantages are ease of visualization and understanding, low computation load favoring simple real-time implementation, and lack of spatial filtering, which allows for more flexibility during the classification step.
脑电图 (EEG) 信号不断受到生物伪迹的叠加影响。特别是自发眨眼是一种经常发生的事件,难以避免。本文的主要目标是提出一种新的眨眼校正 (ABC) 算法,该算法适应个体间和个体内的可变性。突出了基于脑机接口 (BCI) 的 EEG 实验的整个设计过程。从样本量确定到分类,采用了源定位的标准化低分辨率电磁层析成像 (sLORETA) 和时间限制的混合方法,随后是黎曼几何分类器。ABC 与常用的眨眼去除独立成分分析 (ICA) 的比较表明,ABC 具有明显的优势。使用未校正数据作为参考的相同流水线,ABC 平均提高了 5.38%的分类精度,而 ICA 则降低了 -2.67%。此外,虽然 ABC 可以从模拟数据中准确重建无眨眼数据,但 ICA 会导致与原始无眨眼信号相差高达 200%的潜在差异,并且方差增加 30.42%。最后,ABC 的主要优势在于易于可视化和理解、计算负载低,有利于简单的实时实现,以及缺乏空间滤波,这在分类步骤中提供了更大的灵活性。