Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for () Infection.
作者信息
Tenover Fred C, Persing David H, Fang Ferric
机构信息
Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California, USA
Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California, USA.
出版信息
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01079-19. Print 2019 Oct.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for () Infection.
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01079-19. Print 2019 Oct.
2
Reply to Tenover et al., "Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for () Infection".
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01157-19. Print 2019 Oct.
3
A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of () in Adults.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 May 29;32(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00032-18. Print 2019 Jun 19.
4
The predictive value of quantitative nucleic acid amplification detection of Clostridium difficile toxin gene for faecal sample toxin status and patient outcome.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0205941. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205941. eCollection 2018.
5
The Rise and Fall and Rise Again of Toxin Testing for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile Infection.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 30;69(10):1675-1677. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz012.
6
Optimizing the Laboratory Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection.
Clin Lab Med. 2015 Jun;35(2):299-312. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2015.02.003. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
7
Diagnostic pitfalls in Clostridium difficile infection.
Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;29(1):63-82. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2014.11.008. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
8
Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile toxins and laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.
Infection. 2017 Jun;45(3):255-262. doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0940-9. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
9
Building a Better Crystal Ball for Predicting Complications of Clostridium difficile Infection.
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Dec 15;61(12):1789-91. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ751. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
10
Medical Devices; Immunology and Microbiology Devices; Classification of Clostridium Difficile Toxin Gene Amplification Assay. Final order.
Fed Regist. 2015 Aug 27;80(166):51938-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Ultrasensitive and Quantitative Toxin Measurement Correlates With Baseline Severity, Severe Outcomes, and Recurrence Among Hospitalized Patients With Clostridioides difficile Infection.
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 6;74(12):2142-2149. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab826.
2
Reply to Tenover et al., "Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for () Infection".
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01157-19. Print 2019 Oct.
本文引用的文献
1
A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of () in Adults.
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 May 29;32(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00032-18. Print 2019 Jun 19.
2
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins Reveals Suboptimal Accuracy of Toxin Gene Cycle Thresholds for Toxin Predictions.
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 May 24;57(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01885-18. Print 2019 Jun.
3
Toxin Enzyme Immunoassays Detect Clostridioides difficile Infection With Greater Severity and Higher Recurrence Rates.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 30;69(10):1667-1674. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz009.
4
It Is Not about the Assay: Preanalytical Screening Is the Key to Reducing Infection.
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01553-18. Print 2019 Feb.
5
Comparison of Clostridioides difficile Stool Toxin Concentrations in Adults With Symptomatic Infection and Asymptomatic Carriage Using an Ultrasensitive Quantitative Immunoassay.
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):78-86. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy415.
6
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):e1-e48. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix1085.
7
Comparison of the clinical course of Clostridium difficile infection in glutamate dehydrogenase-positive toxin-negative patients diagnosed by PCR to those with a positive toxin test.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Apr;24(4):414-421. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.07.033. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
8
Clostridium difficile PCR Cycle Threshold Predicts Free Toxin.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Sep;55(9):2651-2660. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00563-17. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
9
Point-Counterpoint: What Is the Optimal Approach for Detection of Clostridium difficile Infection?
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Mar;55(3):670-680. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02463-16. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Aug;22 Suppl 4:S63-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
Zotero 插件