Reply to Tenover et al., "Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for () Infection".
作者信息
Sandlund Johanna, Wilcox Mark H
机构信息
Singulex, Inc., Alameda, California, USA
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom.
出版信息
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01157-19. Print 2019 Oct.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Reply to Tenover et al., "Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for () Infection".对特诺弗等人《指南支持单独核酸扩增检测对（）感染的价值》一文的回复
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01157-19. Print 2019 Oct.
2
Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for () Infection.指南支持单独核酸扩增检测对（）感染的价值。 （括号内内容原文缺失）
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01079-19. Print 2019 Oct.
3
Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染管理的日本临床实践指南。
J Infect Chemother. 2022 Aug;28(8):1045-1083. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.12.011. Epub 2022 May 24.
4
Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?艰难梭菌感染的实验室诊断：分子扩增方法能否让我们走出不确定？
J Mol Diagn. 2011 Nov;13(6):573-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
5
Rapid and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification test for Clostridium difficile detection challenges cytotoxin B cell test and culture as gold standard.快速灵敏的环介导等温扩增检测试验用于艰难梭菌检测，挑战细胞毒素 B 细胞检测和培养作为金标准。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Feb;49(2):710-1. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01824-10. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
6
Comparison of nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results using fresh and frozen stool specimens and rectal swabs.比较使用新鲜和冷冻粪便标本和直肠拭子的核酸扩增试验（NAAT）结果。
J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Jan 17;62(1):e0103723. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01037-23. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
7
Evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infections.评估环介导等温扩增检测技术用于诊断艰难梭菌感染。
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jul;49(7):2714-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01835-10. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
8
Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in domestic animals: A short review.家畜艰难梭菌（梭状芽孢杆菌）感染的实验室诊断：简短综述。
Anaerobe. 2022 Jun;75:102574. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2022.102574. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
9
Association between infection testing results and decision to treat.感染检测结果与治疗决策之间的关联。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;43(12):1940-1941. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.333. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
10
Real-world evaluation of a two-step testing algorithm for infection.两步测试算法在感染中的真实世界评估。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;44(9):1494-1496. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.313. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
本文引用的文献
1
Guidelines Support the Value of Stand-Alone Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests for () Infection.指南支持单独核酸扩增检测对（）感染的价值。 （括号内内容原文缺失）
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Sep 24;57(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01079-19. Print 2019 Oct.
2
A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of () in Adults.一项关于核酸扩增检测（NAATs）和包括 NAATs 在内的算法在诊断成人（）中的实验室医学最佳实践系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 May 29;32(3). doi: 10.1128/CMR.00032-18. Print 2019 Jun 19.
3
Cross-sectional study of the prevalence, causes and management of hospital-onset diarrhoea.医院获得性腹泻的患病率、病因及处理的横断面研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Oct;103(2):200-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 8.
4
Ultrasensitive Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins Reveals Suboptimal Accuracy of Toxin Gene Cycle Thresholds for Toxin Predictions.超敏检测艰难梭菌毒素揭示毒素基因循环阈值对毒素预测的准确性欠佳。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 May 24;57(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01885-18. Print 2019 Jun.
5
It Is Not about the Assay: Preanalytical Screening Is the Key to Reducing Infection.关键不在检测方法：分析前筛查是减少感染的关键。
J Clin Microbiol. 2019 Jan 30;57(2). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01553-18. Print 2019 Feb.
6
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA).临床实践指南：成人和儿童艰难梭菌感染：美国传染病学会（IDSA）和美国医疗保健流行病学学会（SHEA）2017 年更新。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Mar 19;66(7):987-994. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy149.
7
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the diagnostic guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection.欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会：艰难梭菌感染诊断指南文件的更新。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016 Aug;22 Suppl 4:S63-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
Overdiagnosis of Clostridium difficile Infection in the Molecular Test Era.分子检测时代艰难梭菌感染的过度诊断
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Nov;175(11):1792-801. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.4114.
9
Differences in outcome according to Clostridium difficile testing method: a prospective multicentre diagnostic validation study of C difficile infection.根据艰难梭菌检测方法的结果差异：艰难梭菌感染的前瞻性多中心诊断验证研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Nov;13(11):936-45. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70200-7. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
10
Association between antibody response to toxin A and protection against recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhoea.针对毒素A的抗体反应与预防艰难梭菌复发性腹泻之间的关联。
Lancet. 2001 Jan 20;357(9251):189-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03592-3.
Zotero 插件