Country Office in Hungary, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Budapest, Hungary.
Division of Health Systems and Public Health, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bull World Health Organ. 2019 May 1;97(5):335-348. doi: 10.2471/BLT.18.218982. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
Health financing is a complex health system function, which cannot be analysed accurately without tracking each step of the flow of funds separately. We analysed the revenue mix of the Hungarian health insurance fund from 1994 to 2015 and discuss the policy implications of our findings. We used the System of Health Accounts published in 2000 and the revised version of 2011, which introduced separate classifications for the sources of health expenditure. Based on the 2000 version, health insurance contributions were the main source of public funding in Hungary. According to the 2011 version, nearly 70% of health insurance fund revenues came from government tax transfers in 2015, illustrating the striking difference in how revenues and expenditures are reported using this version. Use of the 2011 version will better inform national policy-making and international comparisons and facilitate documentation and analysis of how countries have adapted their revenue mix to changing macroeconomic circumstances. The finding that Hungary has a predominantly tax-funded social health insurance system suggests that traditional understanding and description of health-financing models are no longer adequate and may limit consideration of potential resource-generation options. Hungary is also a good example of how separating revenue generation and pooling broadens policy options to tackle gaps in social health insurance coverage, although the government did not act on these due to the lack of a consistent health-financing strategy. The findings may be particularly relevant for low- and middle-income countries that are trying to expand social health insurance coverage despite limited formal employment.
卫生筹资是一项复杂的卫生系统功能,如果不分别跟踪资金流动的每一个步骤,就无法准确分析。我们分析了匈牙利健康保险基金 1994 年至 2015 年的收入构成,并讨论了我们研究结果的政策意义。我们使用了 2000 年发布的《卫生核算体系》和 2011 年修订版,其中引入了卫生支出来源的单独分类。根据 2000 年的版本,健康保险缴款是匈牙利公共供资的主要来源。根据 2011 年的版本,2015 年近 70%的健康保险基金收入来自政府税收转移,这说明了使用该版本报告收入和支出的显著差异。使用 2011 年的版本将更好地为国家决策提供信息,并进行国际比较,同时促进对各国如何根据不断变化的宏观经济环境调整其收入构成的记录和分析。匈牙利有一个主要由税收供资的社会健康保险制度,这一发现表明,传统的卫生筹资模式的理解和描述不再充分,可能限制了对潜在资源生成选项的考虑。匈牙利也是一个很好的例子,说明收入的产生和汇集的分离如何扩大政策选择,以解决社会健康保险覆盖范围的差距,尽管由于缺乏一致的卫生筹资战略,政府没有采取这些措施。这些发现对于那些试图在正规就业有限的情况下扩大社会健康保险覆盖范围的低收入和中等收入国家来说可能特别相关。