Falzon Laura C, Traoré Sylvain, Kallo Vessaly, Assamoi Jean-Baptiste, Bonfoh Bassirou, Schelling Esther
Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Sep 10;6:287. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00287. eCollection 2019.
Brucellosis is a zoonosis of economic and public health concern. While most diagnostic tests for brucellosis can only be performed in the laboratory, the Fluorescence Polarization Assay (FPA) was developed as a rapid point-of-care field test. This pilot project aimed to validate the use of FPA for rapid diagnosis of ruminant brucellosis on the field, and to compare the FPA performance with that of the more commonly used Rose Bengal Test (RBT). Blood samples were first collected from ruminants in a livestock market, and later from a nearby slaughterhouse in Port Bouët, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. Samples collected in the livestock market were processed and tested with the FPA in a central laboratory, while samples collected in the slaughterhouse were processed immediately and the FPA was performed on site. To assess the FPA intra-test agreement, a portion of the serum samples tested at the slaughterhouse were re-tested with the FPA in the laboratory later the same day. To assess inter-test agreement, all serum samples were retested with the RBT. A total of 232 samples were tested with the FPA, 106 and 126 from the livestock market and slaughterhouse, respectively. Of these, 26 tested positive and 39 were doubtful for brucellosis. The FPA was repeated on 28 of the samples collected at the slaughterhouse, and comparison of results indicated a moderate intra-test agreement (Kappa = 0.41). The agreement improved when the doubtful category was treated as negative (Kappa = 0.65), and when cattle were excluded (Kappa = 0.56 to 0.61). The RBT was performed on 229 samples, and of these 10 tested positive. A comparison of FPA and RBT results indicated poor agreement (Kappa = 0.00); this improved to slight when only samples taken at the livestock market and tested in the laboratory were considered (Kappa = 0.14). The FPA did not perform well in tropical field conditions, possibly due to the high ambient temperatures in the slaughterhouse. Moreover, a difference in performance was noted in relation to the species tested, whereby the FPA seemed to perform better on sheep and goat samples, compared to cattle samples. These findings highlight that further adjustments are needed before implementing the FPA on the field.
布鲁氏菌病是一种关乎经济和公共卫生的人畜共患病。虽然大多数布鲁氏菌病诊断测试只能在实验室进行,但荧光偏振测定法(FPA)已被开发为一种快速的即时现场检测方法。这个试点项目旨在验证FPA在现场快速诊断反刍动物布鲁氏菌病的实用性,并将FPA的性能与更常用的虎红平板凝集试验(RBT)进行比较。首先从科特迪瓦阿比让布埃港附近一个牲畜市场的反刍动物身上采集血样,随后又从附近一家屠宰场采集血样。在牲畜市场采集的样本在一个中央实验室进行处理并用FPA检测,而在屠宰场采集的样本则立即进行处理并在现场进行FPA检测。为评估FPA的试验内一致性,当天晚些时候,在屠宰场检测的部分血清样本在实验室再次用FPA检测。为评估试验间一致性,所有血清样本都用RBT重新检测。总共232个样本用FPA检测,其中分别有106个和126个来自牲畜市场和屠宰场。其中,26个检测呈阳性,39个对布鲁氏菌病检测结果存疑。在屠宰场采集的28个样本再次进行FPA检测,结果比较显示试验内一致性中等(Kappa = 0.41)。当将存疑类别视为阴性时(Kappa = 0.65),以及排除牛样本时(Kappa = 0.56至0.61),一致性有所提高。对229个样本进行了RBT检测,其中10个检测呈阳性。FPA和RBT结果比较显示一致性较差(Kappa = 0.00);当仅考虑在牲畜市场采集并在实验室检测的样本时,一致性略有改善(Kappa = 0.14)。FPA在热带现场条件下表现不佳,可能是由于屠宰场的环境温度较高。此外,在检测的物种方面发现了性能差异,与牛样本相比,FPA在绵羊和山羊样本上似乎表现更好。这些发现突出表明,在现场实施FPA之前还需要进一步调整。