Gamma Knife Center, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Department of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
J Neurooncol. 2019 Nov;145(2):265-276. doi: 10.1007/s11060-019-03292-y. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
Information on predictive factors of cognitive functioning in patients with (multiple) brain metastases (BM) selected for radiosurgery may allow for more individual care and may play a role in predicting cognitive outcome after radiosurgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate cognitive performance, and predictors thereof, in patients with 1-10 BM before radiosurgery.
Cognition was measured before radiosurgery using a standardized neuropsychological test battery in patients with 1-10 BM (expected survival > 3 months; KPS ≥ 70; no prior BM treatment). Regression formulae were constructed to calculate sociodemographically corrected z scores. Group and individual cognitive functioning was analyzed. Multivariable regression was used to explore potential predictors.
Patients (N = 92) performed significantly worse than controls (N = 104) on all 11 test variables (medium-large effect sizes for 8 variables). Percentages of impairment were highest for information processing (55.3%), dexterity (43.2%) and cognitive flexibility (28.7%). 62% and 46% of patients had impairments in at least two, or three test variables, respectively. Models including combinations of clinical and psychological variables were predictive of verbal memory, psychomotor speed, information processing and dexterity. Neither number nor volume of metastases predicted patients' test performance.
Already before radiosurgery, almost half of the patients suffered from severe cognitive deficits in at least three test variables. At group and individual level, information processing, cognitive flexibility, and dexterity were most affected. These cognitive impairments may impair daily functioning and patients' ability to make (shared) treatment decisions. Both clinical (symptomatic BM; timing of BM diagnosis) and psychological (mental fatigue) characteristics influenced cognitive performance.
Cognition and Radiation Study A (CAR-Study A; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02953756; Medical Ethics Committee file number: NL53472.028.15/P1515).
选择接受放射外科治疗的(多发性)脑转移瘤(BM)患者的认知功能预测因素的信息可能允许提供更个性化的护理,并可能在预测放射外科治疗后的认知结果方面发挥作用。本研究的目的是评估放射外科治疗前 1-10 个 BM 患者的认知表现及其预测因素。
使用标准化神经心理学测试套件在预期生存时间 > 3 个月的 1-10 个 BM 患者(KPS ≥ 70;无先前 BM 治疗)中进行放射外科治疗前的认知评估。构建回归公式以计算社会人口统计学校正 z 分数。分析组和个体认知功能。使用多变量回归探索潜在的预测因素。
所有 11 个测试变量上,患者(N = 92)的表现明显低于对照组(N = 104)(8 个变量的中到大效应大小)。信息处理(55.3%)、灵巧性(43.2%)和认知灵活性(28.7%)的损伤率最高。62%和 46%的患者分别有至少两个或三个测试变量受损。包括临床和心理变量组合的模型可预测言语记忆、精神运动速度、信息处理和灵巧性。转移瘤的数量和体积均不能预测患者的测试表现。
在放射外科治疗之前,近一半的患者在至少三个测试变量中存在严重的认知缺陷。在组和个体水平上,信息处理、认知灵活性和灵巧性受到的影响最大。这些认知障碍可能会影响日常生活功能和患者做出(共同)治疗决策的能力。临床特征(症状性 BM;BM 诊断的时间)和心理特征(精神疲劳)都影响认知表现。
认知与放射治疗研究 A(CAR 研究 A;ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02953756;医学伦理委员会文件编号:NL53472.028.15/P1515)。