Scampoli Claudia, Cammelli Silvia, Galietta Erika, Siepe Giambattista, Buwenge Milly, Macchia Gabriella, Deodato Francesco, Cilla Savino, Strigari Lidia, Chiesa Silvia, Morganti Alessio Giuseppe
Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 May 31;14(11):2736. doi: 10.3390/cancers14112736.
Preserving cognitive functions is a priority for most patients with brain metastases. Knowing the mechanisms of hyperglutamatergic neurotoxicity and the role of some hippocampal areas in cognitive decline (CD) led to testing both the antiglutamatergic pharmacological prophylaxis and hippocampal-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) techniques. These studies showed a relative reduction in CD four to six months after WBRT. However, the failure to achieve statistical significance in one study that tested memantine alone (RTOG 0614) led to widespread skepticism about this drug in the WBRT setting. Moreover, interest grew in the reasons for the strong patient dropout rates in the first few months after WBRT and for early CD onset. In fact, the latter can only partially be explained by subclinical tumor progression. An emerging interpretation of the (not only) cognitive impairment during and immediately after WBRT is the dysfunction of the limbic and hypothalamic system with its immune and hormonal consequences. This new understanding of WBRT-induced toxicity may represent the basis for further innovative trials. These studies should aim to: (i) evaluate in greater detail the cognitive effects and, more generally, the quality of life impairment during and immediately after WBRT; (ii) study the mechanisms producing these early effects; (iii) test in clinical studies, the modern and advanced WBRT techniques based on both hippocampal-sparing and hypothalamic-pituitary-sparing, currently evaluated only in planning studies; (iv) test new timings of antiglutamatergic drugs administration aimed at preventing not only late toxicity but also acute effects.
对于大多数脑转移患者来说,保留认知功能是首要任务。了解高谷氨酸能神经毒性机制以及海马某些区域在认知衰退(CD)中的作用,促使人们对抗谷氨酸能药物预防和海马保护型全脑放疗(WBRT)技术进行了测试。这些研究表明,WBRT后四到六个月CD相对减少。然而,一项单独测试美金刚的研究(RTOG 0614)未能达到统计学显著性,这导致在WBRT背景下人们对这种药物普遍持怀疑态度。此外,人们对WBRT后最初几个月患者高脱落率以及早期CD发作的原因越来越感兴趣。事实上,后者只能部分由亚临床肿瘤进展来解释。对WBRT期间及之后(不仅)出现的认知障碍的一种新解释是边缘系统和下丘脑系统功能障碍及其免疫和激素后果。对WBRT诱导毒性的这种新认识可能是进一步开展创新试验的基础。这些研究应旨在:(i)更详细地评估WBRT期间及之后的认知效应,以及更普遍地评估生活质量损害;(ii)研究产生这些早期效应的机制;(iii)在临床研究中测试基于海马保护和下丘脑 - 垂体保护的现代先进WBRT技术,目前仅在规划研究中进行评估;(iv)测试抗谷氨酸能药物给药的新时机,旨在不仅预防晚期毒性,还预防急性效应。