• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右翼民粹主义与欧洲自评健康:一项多层次分析。

Right-wing populism and self-rated health in Europe: a multilevel analysis.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Dec;73(12):1116-1121. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211995. Epub 2019 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1136/jech-2018-211995
PMID:31554645
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Individuals who identify as politically conservative have been previously shown to report better self-rated health compared with liberals. We tested whether this association still holds for right-wing populists, which are gaining strength as a political force in Europe in recent decades.

METHODS

We analysed data from 24 617 respondents nested within 18 European countries included in the 2016 European Social Survey. Multilevel analyses were conducted to assess the association between political ideology and self-rated health, adjusting for other individual covariates (happiness and social capital).

RESULTS

Individuals who voted for right-wing populist parties were 43% more likely to report fair/poor health compared with traditional conservatives (OR=1.43, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.67). The association was attenuated (OR=1.21, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.42) after controlling for additional individual-level variables, including happiness and access to social capital. Higher levels of social capital (informal networks, OR=0.40, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.56; trust, OR=0.82, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.92) and happiness (OR=0.18, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.22) were protectively correlated with fair/poor self-rated health.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals voting for right-wing populist parties report worse health compared with conservatives. It remains unclear whether ideology is just a marker for health-related practices, or whether the values and beliefs associated with a particular brand of ideology lead to worse health.

摘要

背景

先前的研究表明,政治上保守的个体自我报告的健康状况优于自由派。我们检验了这种关联是否仍然适用于右翼民粹主义者,近几十年来,右翼民粹主义者作为欧洲的一股政治力量不断壮大。

方法

我们分析了 2016 年欧洲社会调查中包含的 18 个欧洲国家的 24617 名受访者的嵌套数据。采用多水平分析来评估政治意识形态与自我报告的健康状况之间的关联,同时调整了其他个体协变量(幸福感和社会资本)。

结果

与传统保守派相比,投票给右翼民粹主义政党的个体更有可能报告健康状况不佳(OR=1.43,95%CI 1.23 至 1.67)。在控制了包括幸福感和获得社会资本在内的其他个体层面变量后,这种关联减弱(OR=1.21,95%CI 1.03 至 1.42)。较高的社会资本水平(非正式网络,OR=0.40,95%CI 0.29 至 0.56;信任,OR=0.82,95%CI 0.74 至 0.92)和幸福感(OR=0.18,95%CI 0.15 至 0.22)与健康状况不佳呈保护性相关。

结论

投票给右翼民粹主义政党的个体报告的健康状况比保守派差。目前尚不清楚意识形态是否仅仅是健康相关行为的一个标志,还是与特定意识形态品牌相关的价值观和信念会导致更差的健康状况。

相似文献

1
Right-wing populism and self-rated health in Europe: a multilevel analysis.右翼民粹主义与欧洲自评健康:一项多层次分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 Dec;73(12):1116-1121. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211995. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
2
The relationship between social capital and self-rated health: A gendered analysis of 17 European countries.社会资本与自评健康之间的关系:对 17 个欧洲国家的性别分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Dec;219:30-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
3
Political regimes, political ideology, and self-rated health in Europe: a multilevel analysis.欧洲的政治体制、政治意识形态和自评健康:一项多层次分析。
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 22;5(7):e11711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011711.
4
The 'dark side' of social capital: trust and self-rated health in European countries.社会资本的“阴暗面”:欧洲国家的信任与自评健康状况
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Feb;26(1):90-5. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv089. Epub 2015 May 27.
5
Does area-based social capital matter for the health of Australians? A multilevel analysis of self-rated health in Tasmania.基于区域的社会资本对澳大利亚人的健康重要吗?塔斯马尼亚自我评估健康的多层次分析。
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Jun;35(3):607-13. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl010. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
6
Political party affiliation, political ideology and mortality.政党归属、政治意识形态与死亡率。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 May;69(5):423-31. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204803. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
7
Social capital and self-rated health in Colombia: the good, the bad and the ugly.哥伦比亚的社会资本与自评健康:有好有坏也有丑陋。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Feb;72(4):584-90. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.023. Epub 2010 Dec 9.
8
A multilevel analysis of key forms of community- and individual-level social capital as predictors of self-rated health in the United States.对美国社区和个体层面关键形式的社会资本作为自评健康预测因素的多层次分析。
J Urban Health. 2006 Sep;83(5):813-26. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9082-1.
9
Political ideology and health in Japan: a disaggregated analysis.日本的政治意识形态与健康:一项细分分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Sep;64(9):838-40. doi: 10.1136/jech.2009.097915. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
10
Investigating the relationship between self-rated health and social capital in South Africa: a multilevel panel data analysis.探究南非自评健康与社会资本之间的关系:一项多层次面板数据分析。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 19;15:266. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1601-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between social capital and health from a configuration perspective: an evidence from China.从组态视角看社会资本与健康的关系:来自中国的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 24;23(1):1611. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16547-1.
2
Is radicalization a family issue? A systematic review of family-related risk and protective factors, consequences, and interventions against radicalization.激进化是一个家庭问题吗?对与家庭相关的激进化风险因素、保护因素、后果及干预措施的系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 20;18(3):e1266. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1266. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Population health, not individual health, drives support for populist parties.
推动对民粹主义政党支持的是群体健康,而非个人健康。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 May 19;1(3):pgac057. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac057. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Do individuals' attitudes toward immigrants affect their own health? Analysis of 15 European countries.个体对移民的态度是否会影响自身健康?对 15 个欧洲国家的分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Apr 1;32(2):220-225. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab212.