• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤独的心的主人:孤独在整个生命周期中的稳定性。

Owner of a lonely heart: The stability of loneliness across the life span.

机构信息

Department of Personality Psychology and Psychological Assessment, Institute of Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena.

Department of Educational Measurement, Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;119(2):497-516. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000262. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

DOI:10.1037/pspp0000262
PMID:31556683
Abstract

Individuals feel lonely when they perceive a discrepancy between their aspired and their actually experienced amount of closeness and intimacy in social relationships. In the present study, we disentangled developmental constancy factors, time-varying factors such as person-environment transactions, and stochastic mechanisms as sources of interindividual differences in loneliness by applying STARTS models in nationally representative samples from Germany (n = 13,397), Switzerland (n = 6,599), Australia (n = 30,496), and The Netherlands (n = 12,810). Across the 4 studies, we found trait-like sources reflecting developmental constancy factors and the influence of time-varying factors to account for 19-43% and 23-30% of interindividual differences in loneliness, respectively. Depending on the type of measurement instrument, state-like stochastic mechanisms accounted for 30% to 55% of interindividual differences, whereby multi-item measures were less affected by stochastic mechanisms. We found gradual sex differences but considerable differences between age groups regarding the amount of interindividual differences in loneliness accounted for by the three sources. Taken together, the results demonstrate that interindividual differences in loneliness are to a large degree trait-like. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for theory and measurement. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

当个体感知到社交关系中渴望的亲密程度与实际经历的亲密程度之间存在差异时,他们会感到孤独。在本研究中,我们通过在德国(n=13397)、瑞士(n=6599)、澳大利亚(n=30496)和荷兰(n=12810)的全国代表性样本中应用 STARTS 模型,将发展恒常性因素、随时间变化的因素(如人与环境的相互作用)和随机机制分离开来,这些因素是个体间孤独差异的来源。在这 4 项研究中,我们发现反映发展恒常性因素的特质性来源和随时间变化的因素的影响分别解释了孤独的个体间差异的 19%-43%和 23%-30%。根据测量工具的类型,状态样随机机制占个体间差异的 30%-55%,其中多项目测量受随机机制的影响较小。我们发现,在孤独的个体间差异方面,存在逐渐的性别差异,但在不同年龄组之间存在相当大的差异。总的来说,这些结果表明,个体间的孤独差异在很大程度上是特质性的。基于这些发现,我们讨论了对理论和测量的影响。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Owner of a lonely heart: The stability of loneliness across the life span.孤独的心的主人:孤独在整个生命周期中的稳定性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Aug;119(2):497-516. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000262. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
2
Does personality become more stable with age? Disentangling state and trait effects for the big five across the life span using local structural equation modeling.人格随着年龄的增长会变得更加稳定吗?使用局部结构方程模型在整个生命周期中对五大特质进行状态和特质效应的分解。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Apr;116(4):666-680. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000203. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
3
Trait and State Levels of Loneliness in Early and Late Adolescents: Examining the Differential Reactivity Hypothesis.青少年早、晚期的特质性孤独和状态性孤独:检验差异反应假说。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018 Nov-Dec;47(6):888-899. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1146993. Epub 2016 May 18.
4
Personality trait development across the transition to retirement.退休过渡期的人格特质发展。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Apr;116(4):651-665. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000179. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
5
Development of loneliness in midlife and old age: Its nature and correlates.中年和老年孤独感的发展:本质及其相关性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Feb;118(2):388-406. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000219. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
6
Age differences in demographic, social and health-related factors associated with loneliness across the adult life span (19-65 years): a cross-sectional study in the Netherlands.成年期(19 - 65岁)与孤独感相关的人口统计学、社会和健康相关因素的年龄差异:荷兰的一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 6;20(1):1118. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09208-0.
7
Lonely Alone or Lonely Together? A Cultural-Psychological Examination of Individualism-Collectivism and Loneliness in Five European Countries.孤独是一个人还是在一起?对五个欧洲国家的个人主义-集体主义和孤独的文化心理学考察。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 May;45(5):780-793. doi: 10.1177/0146167218796793. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
8
Adjusting the lookout: Subjective health, loneliness, and life satisfaction predict future time perspective.调整展望:主观健康、孤独感和生活满意度预测未来时间观。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Dec;35(8):1170-1183. doi: 10.1037/pag0000513. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
9
The Stability and Change of Loneliness Across the Life Span: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies.孤独感在整个生命周期中的稳定性和变化:纵向研究的元分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 Feb;24(1):24-52. doi: 10.1177/1088868319850738. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Who are lonely? Loneliness in different age groups (18-81 years old), using two measures of loneliness.哪些人感到孤独?针对不同年龄组(18至81岁)的人群,采用两种孤独感测量方法进行研究。
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2014;78(3):229-57. doi: 10.2190/AG.78.3.b.

引用本文的文献

1
Social interactions and loneliness in daily life: A study of younger adults and cognitively diverse older adults.日常生活中的社交互动与孤独感:一项针对年轻人和认知能力各异的老年人的研究。
Dev Psychol. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1037/dev0002069.
2
Do We Become More Lonely With Age? A Coordinated Data Analysis of Nine Longitudinal Studies.随着年龄的增长,我们会变得更加孤独吗?九项纵向研究的协同数据分析。
Psychol Sci. 2024 Jun;35(6):579-596. doi: 10.1177/09567976241242037. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
3
Loneliness dynamics and physical health symptomology among midlife adults in daily life.
中年成年人日常生活中的孤独动态和身体健康症状学。
Health Psychol. 2024 Jul;43(7):528-538. doi: 10.1037/hea0001377. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
4
Why So Lonely? The Direct and Indirect Associations between Developmental Trajectories of Fear of Negative Evaluation, Prosocial Behavior and Loneliness in Adolescence.为何如此孤独?青少年期对负面评价的恐惧、亲社会行为与孤独感发展轨迹之间的直接和间接关联
J Youth Adolesc. 2024 Jul;53(7):1699-1710. doi: 10.1007/s10964-024-01959-y. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
5
Connecting loneliness with pathological personality traits: Evidence for genetic and environmental mediation from a study of older twins.将孤独感与病态人格特质联系起来:来自老年双胞胎研究的遗传和环境中介的证据。
Personal Disord. 2024 Jan;15(1):34-45. doi: 10.1037/per0000635. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
6
Predictors of loneliness onset and maintenance in European older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间欧洲老年人孤独感产生及持续存在的预测因素
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 2;14:1172552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172552. eCollection 2023.
7
'Women in the front': Psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: Depression, anxiety, loneliness, and somatization in the Israel population.'前线的女性':COVID-19 大流行的心理影响:以色列人口中的抑郁、焦虑、孤独和躯体化。
Psychiatry Res. 2023 Mar;321:115069. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115069. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
8
How (Not) to Measure Loneliness: A Review of the Eight Most Commonly Used Scales.如何(不)测量孤独感:八种最常用量表的综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;19(17):10816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710816.
9
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on depression, anxiety, loneliness, and satisfaction in the German general population: a longitudinal analysis.新冠疫情对德国一般人群中抑郁、焦虑、孤独和满意度的影响:一项纵向分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;57(12):2481-2490. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02311-0. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
10
Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores.真正的孤独会站出来吗?孤独得分的有效性和单项得分的可靠性。
Assessment. 2023 Jun;30(4):1226-1248. doi: 10.1177/10731911221077227. Epub 2022 Mar 4.