• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How (Not) to Measure Loneliness: A Review of the Eight Most Commonly Used Scales.如何(不)测量孤独感:八种最常用量表的综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;19(17):10816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710816.
2
Psychometric assessment of scales for measuring loneliness and social isolation: an analysis of the household, income and labour dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey.用于测量孤独感和社会隔离的量表的心理测量评估:对澳大利亚家庭、收入和劳动力动态调查(HILDA)的分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Mar 5;20(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01946-6.
3
Psychometric properties of the short-form UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) among Chinese adolescents.中文版青少年简明版加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(ULS-8)的心理测量学特性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(38):e12373. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012373.
4
Development and Validation of a New Measurement Scale for Existential Loneliness.发展和验证一种新的存在孤独感测量量表。
Assessment. 2024 Jul;31(5):1100-1113. doi: 10.1177/10731911231204831. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
5
Comparing the Psychometric Properties among Three Versions of the UCLA Loneliness Scale in Individuals with Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder.比较精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍个体中三种版本的 UCLA 孤独量表的心理测量特性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;19(14):8443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148443.
6
Development and validation of a 6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis.运用 Rasch 分析开发并验证 6 项修订版加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(RULS-6)。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):233-256. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12404. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the 11-Item de Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale in Iranian Older Adults.伊朗老年人中11项德容·吉尔维尔德孤独感量表波斯语版本的心理测量特性
Eval Health Prof. 2021 Dec;44(4):378-384. doi: 10.1177/01632787211015713. Epub 2021 May 19.
8
Validation of the Chinese translation of the 6-item De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale in elderly Chinese.6项德容·吉尔维尔德孤独量表中文版在老年中国人中的效度验证。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2008 Dec;20(6):1262-72. doi: 10.1017/S1041610208007552. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
9
A Systematic Review of the Development and Psychometric Properties of Loneliness Measures for Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年孤独感测量工具的发展和心理测量学特性的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 22;18(6):3285. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063285.
10
Psychometric properties of the Posttraumatic Cognition Inventory within a Northern Ireland adolescent sample.北爱尔兰青少年样本中创伤后认知量表的心理测量特性。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2015 Nov;54(4):435-49. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12089. Epub 2015 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Depression among older adults in Norway 1995-2019: Time trends, correlates, and future projections in a population study: The HUNT study.1995 - 2019年挪威老年人的抑郁症:一项人群研究中的时间趋势、相关因素及未来预测:HUNT研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 31;20(7):e0328413. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328413. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric analysis of the social connectedness instrument.社交联结量表的心理测量分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 11;16:1565267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565267. eCollection 2025.
3
Coproducing a new scale with young people aged 10-24 years: a protocol for the development and validation of the Youth Loneliness Scale (YLS).与10至24岁的年轻人共同编制一个新量表:青少年孤独感量表(YLS)的开发与验证方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 22;15(7):e097497. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097497.
4
Lifestyle Interventions for Treatment and Remission of Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes in Adults: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Lifestyle Medicine.成人2型糖尿病和糖尿病前期治疗与缓解的生活方式干预:美国生活方式医学学院临床实践指南
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025 Jun 10;19(2 Suppl):10S-131S. doi: 10.1177/15598276251325488. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Exploring perinatal loneliness as a key social determinant of perinatal mental ill health in the UK: findings from a multidisciplinary consensus statement exercise that mapped knowledge about measurement, prevalence, antecedents, impacts and interventions, and agreed future priorities for research, policy and practice.探索围产期孤独感作为英国围产期心理健康的关键社会决定因素:一项多学科共识声明活动的结果,该活动梳理了关于测量、患病率、前因、影响和干预措施的知识,并确定了研究、政策和实践的未来优先事项。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 31;15(5):e085669. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085669.
6
Revisiting the cognitive and behavioral aspects of loneliness: Insights from different measurement approaches.重新审视孤独的认知和行为方面:来自不同测量方法的见解。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 28;20(4):e0321931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321931. eCollection 2025.
7
Unmasking Nuances Affecting Loneliness: Using Digital Behavioural Markers to Understand Social and Emotional Loneliness in College Students.揭示影响孤独感的细微差别:利用数字行为标记理解大学生的社交孤独感和情感孤独感。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 19;25(6):1903. doi: 10.3390/s25061903.
8
Emotional vs. social loneliness and prolonged grief: a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model.情感孤独与社交孤独及持续性悲伤:随机截距交叉滞后面板模型
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2488101. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2488101. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
9
Frailty and loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: examining reciprocal associations within a measurement burst design.社区居住老年人的衰弱与孤独:在测量突发设计中检验相互关联
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 1;25(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05808-w.
10
Exploring child and youth understanding of loneliness through qualitative insights and evaluating loneliness measures considering those lived experiences.通过定性见解探索儿童和青少年对孤独的理解,并结合这些生活经历评估孤独测量方法。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Feb;1544(1):42-54. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15269. Epub 2025 Jan 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Are we measuring loneliness in the same way in men and women in the general population and in the older population? Two studies of measurement equivalence.在普通人群和老年人群中,我们是否以相同的方式测量男性和女性的孤独感?两项测量等效性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 29;17(12):e0266167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266167. eCollection 2022.
2
Measuring Loneliness in Different Age Groups: The Measurement Invariance of the UCLA Loneliness Scale.测量不同年龄段的孤独感:UCLA 孤独感量表的测量不变性。
Assessment. 2023 Jul;30(5):1688-1715. doi: 10.1177/10731911221119533. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
The Association between Trajectories of Loneliness and Physical Frailty in Chinese Older Adults: Does Age Matter?孤独轨迹与中国老年人身体虚弱的关系:年龄重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 22;19(9):5105. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095105.
4
Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores.真正的孤独会站出来吗?孤独得分的有效性和单项得分的可靠性。
Assessment. 2023 Jun;30(4):1226-1248. doi: 10.1177/10731911221077227. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
5
Using a Loneliness Measure to Screen for Risk of Mental Health Problems: A Replication in Two Nationally Representative Cohorts.使用孤独感量表筛查心理健康问题风险:在两个全国代表性队列中的复制研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;19(3):1641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031641.
6
The Psychological Structure of Loneliness.寂寞的心理结构。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;19(3):1061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031061.
7
The developmental course of loneliness in adolescence: Implications for mental health, educational attainment, and psychosocial functioning.青少年孤独感的发展过程:对心理健康、教育程度和社会心理功能的影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2023 May;35(2):537-546. doi: 10.1017/S0954579421001632. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
8
The Missing Measure of Loneliness: A Case for Including Neededness in Loneliness Scales.孤独的缺失衡量标准:将需要感纳入孤独量表的必要性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 31;19(1):429. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010429.
9
Loneliness in Gender-Diverse and Sexual Orientation-Diverse Adolescents: Measurement Invariance Analyses and Between-Group Comparisons.性别多样化和性取向多样化青少年的孤独感:测量不变性分析和组间比较。
Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):706-727. doi: 10.1177/10731911211065167. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
10
Loneliness and Mental Health: The Mediating Effect of Perceived Social Support.孤独感与心理健康:感知社会支持的中介作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 14;18(22):11963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211963.

如何(不)测量孤独感:八种最常用量表的综述。

How (Not) to Measure Loneliness: A Review of the Eight Most Commonly Used Scales.

机构信息

Interdisciplinary Social Science: Youth Studies, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Manchester Institute of Education, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 30;19(17):10816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710816.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph191710816
PMID:36078540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9518421/
Abstract

Loneliness affects well-being and has long-term negative impacts on physical and mental health, educational outcomes, and employability. Because of those current and long-term impacts, loneliness is a significant issue for which we need reliable and appropriate measurement scales. In the current paper, psychometric properties of the eight most commonly used loneliness scales are reviewed both descriptively and meta-analytically. Results suggest that for many of the scales, the psychometric properties are promising. However, for some psychometric features, especially test-retest reliability and measurement invariance, evidence is rather scarce. Most striking, however, is the fact that all of the scales included items that do not measure loneliness. Surprisingly, for many (sub)scales, this was even the case for about half of the items. Because our measures are the foundation of our research work, it is crucial to improve the way loneliness is being measured.

摘要

孤独感会影响幸福感,并对身心健康、教育成果和就业能力产生长期的负面影响。由于这些当前和长期的影响,孤独感是一个我们需要可靠和适当的测量尺度来解决的重要问题。在当前的论文中,我们从描述性和元分析两个方面来回顾八种最常用的孤独感量表的心理测量特性。结果表明,对于许多量表来说,其心理测量特性是有希望的。然而,对于一些心理测量特征,特别是重测信度和测量不变性,证据相当匮乏。最引人注目的是,所有这些量表都包含了一些不能测量孤独感的项目。令人惊讶的是,对于许多(子)量表来说,这种情况甚至发生在大约一半的项目中。因为我们的测量方法是我们研究工作的基础,所以改进测量孤独感的方法至关重要。