Vose B M, Moore M
Semin Hematol. 1985 Jan;22(1):27-40.
There is continuing interest in the possibility of immunologic intervention in the therapy of malignant disease. By employing a range of different techniques, it has been possible to show the presence of activated helper, suppressor, and cytotoxic T cells, B cells, NK precursors, and macrophages at the tumor site. The overwhelming impression from our data is that tumors may be subject to immunologic attack by heterogeneous effectors and that there is selective trapping of these effectors with corresponding depletion at the periphery. Like all inflammatory sites, however, the tumor contains both positive and negative regulatory mechanisms with the coexistence of cells with effector and suppressor functions, eg, T suppressors that modulate the proliferative response of T helpers and macrophages suppressing NK function contribute to the dynamic interplay in situ. Additional complexity is indicated by immunohistologic studies that clearly show that the stroma rather than foci of tumor cells are the site of infiltration, thereby further limiting effector function. We are now at the end of the descriptive stage of our investigations and further studies must approach the more difficult problem of modifying the host response in such a way as to alter the balance between effector and suppressor activity. A promising area of research would appear to be the use of cloned helper T cells or their products in the immunotherapy of cancer. The demonstration, by us, of selective trapping at tumor sites suggests that administration of the patients' own T cells with antitumor reactivity may serve as an efficient delivery vehicle to activate host effectors in situ. Studies in animal systems have shown the feasibility of this approach, although the failure of cultured T cells to undergo normal recirculation represents a considerable unresolved problem. Effector function by each of the tumor-infiltrating cell types described is under T cell control, and preliminary studies have already indicated the ability of helper T cells to accelerate allograft and tumor rejection. The increasing availability of gene-cloned materials with potent biologic activity opens new areas of research in cancer therapy. The lymphokines IL-2 and interferon are already undergoing clinical trials. Studies by Hersey demonstrate that administration of conditioned medium containing impure IL-2 results in the appearance of antitumor effectors in previously nonreactive melanoma patients, and Rosenberg, among others, has shown IL-2 to be a potent enhancer of alloimmune responses. Lymphokine-activating macrophages also augment antitumour responses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
对于免疫干预在恶性疾病治疗中的可能性,人们一直保持着浓厚的兴趣。通过运用一系列不同的技术,已经有可能证明在肿瘤部位存在活化的辅助性T细胞、抑制性T细胞、细胞毒性T细胞、B细胞、自然杀伤细胞前体和巨噬细胞。我们的数据给人的总体印象是,肿瘤可能受到异质性效应细胞的免疫攻击,并且这些效应细胞会在肿瘤部位选择性滞留,同时在外周相应减少。然而,与所有炎症部位一样,肿瘤既包含正调控机制,也包含负调控机制,具有效应功能和抑制功能的细胞共存,例如,调节辅助性T细胞增殖反应的抑制性T细胞以及抑制自然杀伤细胞功能的巨噬细胞,都参与了原位的动态相互作用。免疫组织学研究表明,肿瘤细胞的浸润部位是基质而非肿瘤细胞灶,这进一步限制了效应功能,表明情况更加复杂。我们目前正处于研究的描述阶段的末期,进一步的研究必须着手解决更困难的问题,即如何改变宿主反应,从而改变效应细胞和抑制细胞活性之间的平衡。一个有前景的研究领域似乎是在癌症免疫治疗中使用克隆的辅助性T细胞或其产物。我们对肿瘤部位选择性滞留的证明表明,给患者注射具有抗肿瘤反应性的自身T细胞,可能作为一种有效的递送载体,在原位激活宿主效应细胞。动物系统研究表明了这种方法的可行性,尽管培养的T细胞无法进行正常再循环仍是一个重大的未解决问题。上述每种肿瘤浸润细胞类型的效应功能都受T细胞控制,初步研究已经表明辅助性T细胞具有加速同种异体移植排斥和肿瘤排斥的能力。具有强大生物活性的基因克隆材料日益增多,为癌症治疗开辟了新的研究领域。白细胞介素-2和干扰素已经在进行临床试验。赫西的研究表明,给先前无反应的黑色素瘤患者注射含有不纯白细胞介素-2的条件培养基,会出现抗肿瘤效应细胞,罗森伯格等人则表明白细胞介素-2是同种免疫反应的强效增强剂。淋巴因子激活的巨噬细胞也能增强抗肿瘤反应。(摘要截选至400词)