Hagiwara Hikaru, Nagai Noritsugu, Otsubo Kotomi, Sasaki Sou, Aoyagi Hiroyuki, Chiba Yasuyuki, Komoriyama Hirokazu, Kato Yoshiya, Takahashi Masayuki, Tokuda Yusuke, Shimizu Toshihiro, Sato Minoru, Nagai Toshiyuki, Anzai Toshihisa
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kushiro City General Hospital Hokkaido Japan.
Circ Rep. 2024 Dec 11;7(1):15-24. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0131. eCollection 2025 Jan 10.
Because it is unclear whether implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are equally effective in patients of all ages, we investigated the association of age with long-term clinical outcomes of patients who underwent ICD implantation.
A total of 416 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 years) from 4 tertiary hospitals who underwent ICD implantation or were upgraded from an existing permanent pacemaker between January 2011 and November 2022 were enrolled and divided into 3 groups based on age: <65 years (n=158), 65-74 years (n=138), and ≥75 years (n=120). We compared the incidence of all-cause death and adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiac death, appropriate ICD therapy, and heart failure hospitalization. During a median follow-up period of 3.2 years (interquartile range: 1.1-5.6 years), 120 patients died. Older patients had a higher cumulative incidence of all-cause death and composite adverse cardiovascular events. The cumulative incidence of cardiac death and appropriate ICD therapies did not differ significantly; however, the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure increased with age. In multivariate analysis, age was independently associated with all-cause death but not composite adverse outcomes.
Age had a significant effect on subsequent all-cause death, but not on adverse cardiovascular events in patients with ICDs, suggesting that age should not be the only indication considered for ICD implantation.
由于植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)在所有年龄段患者中的有效性尚不清楚,我们研究了年龄与接受ICD植入患者长期临床结局之间的关联。
纳入了2011年1月至2022年11月期间来自4家三级医院的416例连续患者(平均年龄:69岁),这些患者接受了ICD植入或从现有的永久性起搏器升级而来,并根据年龄分为3组:<65岁(n = 158)、65 - 74岁(n = 138)和≥75岁(n = 120)。我们比较了全因死亡和不良心血管事件的发生率,包括心源性死亡、ICD恰当治疗和心力衰竭住院。在中位随访期3.2年(四分位间距:1.1 - 5.6年)内,120例患者死亡。老年患者全因死亡和复合不良心血管事件的累积发生率更高。心源性死亡和ICD恰当治疗的累积发生率无显著差异;然而,心力衰竭住院的发生率随年龄增加。在多变量分析中,年龄与全因死亡独立相关,但与复合不良结局无关。
年龄对ICD患者随后的全因死亡有显著影响,但对不良心血管事件无显著影响,这表明年龄不应是ICD植入唯一考虑的指征。