• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

邀请评论:社会流行病学带来了什么——调和社会流行病学和因果推断。

Invited Commentary: What Social Epidemiology Brings to the Table-Reconciling Social Epidemiology and Causal Inference.

出版信息

Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 2;189(3):171-174. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz197.

DOI:10.1093/aje/kwz197
PMID:31566211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8599293/
Abstract

In response to the Galea and Hernán article, "Win-Win: Reconciling Social Epidemiology and Causal Inference" (Am J Epidemiol. 2020;189(XX):XXXX-XXXX), we offer a definition of social epidemiology. We then argue that methodological challenges most salient to social epidemiology have not been adequately addressed in quantitative causal inference, that identifying causes is a worthy scientific goal, and that quantitative causal inference can learn from social epidemiology's methodological innovations. Finally, we make 3 recommendations for quantitative causal inference.

摘要

针对 Galea 和 Hernán 的文章《双赢:调和社会流行病学与因果推断》(Am J Epidemiol. 2020;189(XX):XXXX-XXXX),我们给出了社会流行病学的定义。然后,我们认为对社会流行病学最重要的方法学挑战在定量因果推断中尚未得到充分解决,确定原因是一个有价值的科学目标,定量因果推断可以从社会流行病学的方法创新中学习。最后,我们对定量因果推断提出了 3 项建议。

相似文献

1
Invited Commentary: What Social Epidemiology Brings to the Table-Reconciling Social Epidemiology and Causal Inference.邀请评论:社会流行病学带来了什么——调和社会流行病学和因果推断。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 2;189(3):171-174. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz197.
2
Invited Commentary: Making Causal Inference More Social and (Social) Epidemiology More Causal.邀请评论:使因果推断更具社会性,使(社会)流行病学更具因果性。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 2;189(3):179-182. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz199.
3
Win-Win: Reconciling Social Epidemiology and Causal Inference.双赢:调和社会流行病学与因果推断。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 2;189(3):167-170. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz158.
4
Invited Commentary: Counterfactuals in Social Epidemiology-Thinking Outside of "the Box".特邀评论:社会流行病学中的反事实推理——跳出“框框”思考。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 2;189(3):175-178. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz198.
5
Galea and Hernán Respond to "Brings to the Table," "Differential Measurement Error," and "Causal Inference in Social Epidemiology".加利亚和埃尔南对《摆在桌面上的内容》《差异测量误差》以及《社会流行病学中的因果推断》作出回应。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 2;189(3):183-184. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz201.
6
Invited commentary: do-it-yourself modern epidemiology--at last!特邀评论:终于可以自己动手做现代流行病学研究了!
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Oct 1;180(7):669-72. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu221. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
7
Demystifying Statistical Inference When Using Machine Learning in Causal Research.在因果研究中使用机器学习时揭开统计推断的神秘面纱。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 15;192(9):1545-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab200.
8
Invited commentary: On the future of social epidemiology--a case for scientific realism.特邀评论:关于社会流行病学的未来——一种科学实在论的观点。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Sep 15;178(6):852-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwt143. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
9
Invited commentary: Agent-based models for causal inference—reweighting data and theory in epidemiology.特邀评论:基于主体的因果推断模型——流行病学中数据与理论的重新加权
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Jan 15;181(2):103-5. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu272. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
10
The evolution of selection bias in the recent epidemiologic literature-a selective overview.近期流行病学文献中选择偏倚的演变——选择性概述。
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Mar 4;194(3):580-584. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae282.

引用本文的文献

1
Inconsistent consistency: evaluating the well-defined intervention assumption in applied epidemiological research.不一致的一致性:评估应用流行病学研究中明确定义的干预假设
Int J Epidemiol. 2025 Feb 16;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaf015.
2
Methodological approaches to structural change: epidemiology and the case for reparations.结构变革的方法论途径:流行病学与赔偿的理由
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 May 7;194(5):1249-1254. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae336.
3
Theorizing epidemiology, the stories bodies tell, and embodied truths: a status update on contending 21 c CE epidemiological theories of disease distribution.理论流行病学、身体讲述的故事和体现的真理:对 21 世纪流行病学疾病分布理论的争鸣的现状更新。
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2024 Oct;54(4):331-342. doi: 10.1177/27551938241269188. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
4
Selection Bias in Health Research: Quantifying, Eliminating, or Exacerbating Health Disparities?健康研究中的选择偏倚:量化、消除还是加剧健康差异?
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2024 Mar;11(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s40471-023-00325-z. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
5
Structural racism theory, measurement, and methods: A scoping review.结构种族主义理论、测量和方法:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 16;11:1069476. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1069476. eCollection 2023.
6
An Umbrella Review of the Links Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Substance Misuse: What, Why, and Where Do We Go from Here?童年不良经历与物质滥用之间联系的综合评价:是什么、为什么以及我们从这里走向何方?
Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2022 Nov 15;13:83-100. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S341818. eCollection 2022.
7
Invited Commentary: Conducting and Emulating Trials to Study Effects of Social Interventions.邀请评论:开展和模拟试验研究社会干预措施的效果。
Am J Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 23;191(8):1453-1456. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac066.
8
Conceptualizing, Contextualizing, and Operationalizing Race in Quantitative Health Sciences Research.将种族概念化、情境化和操作化在定量健康科学研究中。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;20(2):157-163. doi: 10.1370/afm.2792. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
9
Structural Racism and Quantitative Causal Inference: A Life Course Mediation Framework for Decomposing Racial Health Disparities.结构性种族主义与定量因果推断:分解种族健康差异的生命历程中介框架
J Health Soc Behav. 2022 Jun;63(2):232-249. doi: 10.1177/00221465211066108. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
10
Mediation effects that emulate a target randomised trial: Simulation-based evaluation of ill-defined interventions on multiple mediators.中介效应模拟目标随机试验:对多个中介变量的不明确干预措施的基于模拟的评估。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Jun;30(6):1395-1412. doi: 10.1177/0962280221998409. Epub 2021 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Win-Win: Reconciling Social Epidemiology and Causal Inference.双赢:调和社会流行病学与因果推断。
Am J Epidemiol. 2020 Mar 2;189(3):167-170. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz158.
2
Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?循证决策不同于循证医学,那么在弥合证据与政策之间的差距方面,你应该走多远呢?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Apr 26;15(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x.
3
Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions.美国的结构性种族主义和健康不平等:证据与干预。
Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1453-1463. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X.
4
Triangulation in aetiological epidemiology.病因学流行病学中的三角剖分法
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 1;45(6):1866-1886. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw314.
5
Jim Crow and estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer: US-born black and white non-Hispanic women, 1992-2012.吉姆·克劳法与雌激素受体阴性乳腺癌:1992年至2012年在美国出生的非西班牙裔黑人和白人女性
Cancer Causes Control. 2017 Jan;28(1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s10552-016-0834-2. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
6
Does water kill? A call for less casual causal inferences.水会致命吗?呼吁减少随意的因果推断。
Ann Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;26(10):674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
7
Exploring racial differences in the obesity gender gap.探究肥胖性别差异中的种族差异。
Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;25(6):420-5. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
8
Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention policy.将儿童肥胖后果纳入考量框架,以增加公众对肥胖预防政策的支持。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Nov;103(11):e96-102. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301271. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
9
Metropolitan-level racial residential segregation and black-white disparities in hypertension.大都市层面的种族居住隔离与高血压的黑白差异。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 1;174(5):537-45. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr116. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
10
Images of illness: how causal claims and racial associations influence public preferences toward diabetes research spending.疾病形象:因果关系主张和种族关联如何影响公众对糖尿病研究支出的偏好。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2010 Dec;35(6):921-59. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2010-034.