Mahendra I Gusti Agung Agus, Wilopo Siswanto Agus, Putra I Gusti Ngurah Edi
Center for Public Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019 Dec;24(6):480-486. doi: 10.1080/13625187.2019.1670345. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
This study aimed to analyse the association between the decision-making pattern and the use of long-acting and permanent methods of contraception (LAPMs) among married and cohabiting women in Indonesia, by controlling for variables at the individual and community or regional level, and geographical area (province). A cross-sectional survey was conducted using secondary data from Performance Monitoring and Accountability 2020 (PMA2020) which involved 4724 married or cohabitating women aged 15-49 years. Data were analysed using bivariate and multivariate analysis. Multilevel logistic regression was performed to investigate the determinants by taking geographical area into account. The majority of women (63.8%) had made their own decision on current contraceptive use, 30.1% had made a joint decision with their partner or health care provider, and 6.1% had not been involved in the decision-making process. Multilevel analysis showed that the decision-making pattern and individual level factors were significantly associated with LAPM use, and variables at community or regional level were not significant predictors. Compared with women who had made their own decision on contraceptive use, LAPM use was 2.3 times higher in women who had made a joint decision with their partner or health care provider (odds ratio [OR] 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0, 2.7; < .001) and more than three times higher in women not involved in the decision-making process (OR 3.1; 95% CI 2.3, 4.1; < .001). Coercion potentially occurs in the contraceptive decision-making process. Our findings suggest that LAPM use may be increased by encouraging joint contraceptive decision making. Increasing women's participation in the decision-making process is an integral part of respecting women's reproductive autonomy.
本研究旨在通过控制个体、社区或地区层面以及地理区域(省份)的变量,分析印度尼西亚已婚和同居女性的决策模式与长效和永久性避孕方法(LAPMs)使用之间的关联。使用来自2020年绩效监测与问责制(PMA2020)的二手数据进行了一项横断面调查,该调查涉及4724名年龄在15 - 49岁的已婚或同居女性。使用双变量和多变量分析对数据进行了分析。进行了多水平逻辑回归以考虑地理区域来调查决定因素。大多数女性(63.8%)对当前的避孕措施自行做了决定,30.1%与伴侣或医疗服务提供者共同做了决定,6.1%未参与决策过程。多水平分析表明,决策模式和个体层面因素与长效和永久性避孕方法的使用显著相关,而社区或地区层面的变量不是显著的预测因素。与自行决定避孕措施的女性相比,与伴侣或医疗服务提供者共同做决定的女性使用长效和永久性避孕方法的可能性高出2.3倍(优势比[OR] 2.3;95%置信区间[CI] 2.0,2.7;<0.001),未参与决策过程的女性则高出三倍多(OR 3.1;95% CI 2.3,4.1;<0.001)。在避孕决策过程中可能存在强制行为。我们的研究结果表明,鼓励共同做出避孕决策可能会增加长效和永久性避孕方法的使用。增加女性在决策过程中的参与是尊重女性生殖自主权的一个组成部分。