• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索旁观者干预的行动策略:模拟旁观者的后果。

Exploring action coils for bystander intervention: Modeling bystander consequences.

作者信息

Banyard Victoria, Moschella Elizabeth, Jouriles Ernest, Grych John

机构信息

School of Social Work, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Prevention Innovations Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Health. 2021 Apr;69(3):283-289. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1665052. Epub 2019 Sep 30.

DOI:10.1080/07448481.2019.1665052
PMID:31566479
Abstract

Individuals who take action to reduce sexual assault can experience a range of positive and negative consequences as a result of helping. This study examined how different types of consequences explain variation in confidence and intent to help. Nine hundred sixty-six individuals who reported intervening in a situation involving interpersonal violence; approximately half were recruited from university psychology courses and half through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Data were collected from September to December of 2016. Participants completed measures of consequences related to helping, bystander efficacy, and intent to help. Positive reactions from victims and other individuals who witnessed the situation were related to higher efficacy and intent, while negative reactions were associated with lower efficacy and intent. Actionists' personal feelings (ie, positive and negative) about their behavior mediated these relationships. Bystander training on campuses should address the range of potential consequences actionists face.

摘要

采取行动减少性侵犯的个人可能会因提供帮助而经历一系列积极和消极的后果。本研究探讨了不同类型的后果如何解释信心和帮助意愿的差异。966名报告曾介入涉及人际暴力情况的个人;大约一半是从大学心理学课程招募的,另一半是通过亚马逊的土耳其机器人平台招募的。数据收集于2016年9月至12月。参与者完成了与帮助相关的后果、旁观者效能和帮助意愿的测量。受害者和其他目睹该情况的人的积极反应与更高的效能和意愿相关,而消极反应则与更低的效能和意愿相关。行动者对自己行为的个人感受(即积极和消极)介导了这些关系。校园旁观者培训应解决行动者面临的一系列潜在后果。

相似文献

1
Exploring action coils for bystander intervention: Modeling bystander consequences.探索旁观者干预的行动策略:模拟旁观者的后果。
J Am Coll Health. 2021 Apr;69(3):283-289. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1665052. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
2
Reactions to Actions: Exploring How Types of Bystander Action Are Linked to Positive and Negative Consequences.对行为的反应:探索不同类型的旁观者行为如何与积极和消极后果相关联。
J Prim Prev. 2020 Dec;41(6):585-602. doi: 10.1007/s10935-020-00618-9. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
3
Adverse Consequences to Assisting Victims of Campus Violence: Initial Investigations Among College Students.协助校园暴力受害者的不良后果:大学生群体中的初步调查。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Feb;36(3-4):NP1607-1624NP. doi: 10.1177/0886260517746944. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
4
Beyond the Situational Model: Bystander Action Consequences to Intervening in Situations Involving Sexual Violence.超越情境模型:在涉及性暴力的情境中进行干预的旁观者行为后果。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Oct;33(20):3211-3231. doi: 10.1177/0886260516635319. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
5
Preventing Interpersonal Violence on College Campuses: The Effect of One Act Training on Bystander Intervention.预防大学校园中的人际暴力:单行为训练对旁观者干预的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Apr;32(7):1103-1126. doi: 10.1177/0886260515587666. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
6
"A Person I Cared About Was Involved": Exploring Bystander Motivation to Help in Incidents of Potential Sexual Assault and Dating Violence.“我关心的人卷入其中”:探索旁观者在潜在性侵犯和约会暴力事件中提供帮助的动机。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):4406-4430. doi: 10.1177/0886260518791232. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
7
A Multi-Topic Bystander Intervention Program for Upper-Level Undergraduate Students: Outcomes in Sexual Violence, Racism, and High-Risk Alcohol Situations.多主题旁观者干预计划对高年级本科生的影响:在性暴力、种族主义和高风险酒精情境下的结果。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Aug;38(15-16):9395-9422. doi: 10.1177/08862605231165778. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
A web-based sexual violence bystander intervention for male college students: randomized controlled trial.一项针对男大学生的基于网络的性暴力旁观者干预措施:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Sep 5;16(9):e203. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3426.
9
Action and Reaction: The Impact of Consequences of Intervening in Situations of Interpersonal Violence.行动与反应:干预人际暴力情境后果的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Apr;36(7-8):NP3820-NP3843. doi: 10.1177/0886260518782983. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Online Intervention to Educate College Students About Dating Violence and Bystander Responses.评估在线干预对大学生恋爱暴力和旁观者反应教育效果的研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):NP7516-NP7546. doi: 10.1177/0886260519829769. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Bystander Intervention in Coercive Control: Do Relationship to the Victim, Bystander Gender, and Concerns Influence Willingness to Intervene?旁观者干预强制性控制:与受害者的关系、旁观者的性别和关注因素是否会影响干预意愿?
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug;39(15-16):3791-3815. doi: 10.1177/08862605241234350. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
2
The Lived Experience of Racism in the Sikh Community.锡克社区中的种族主义经历。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Jun;39(11-12):2415-2436. doi: 10.1177/08862605231218225. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
3
The bystander intervention for problematic alcohol use model (BIPAUM).
问题性酒精使用的旁观者干预模型(BIPAUM)。
J Am Coll Health. 2025 Feb;73(2):792-802. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2245497. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
4
Are the Bystanders Okay? Exploring the Impact of Bystander Behavior for Self-directed Violence.旁观者还好吗?探索旁观者行为对自我伤害的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2022 Feb;70(2):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Oct 5.