• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下背痛致残中的心理因素

Psychologic factors in low-back-pain disability.

作者信息

Frymoyer J W, Rosen J C, Clements J, Pope M H

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 May(195):178-84.

PMID:3156708
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Biomechanical tests, physical examination, spinal radiographs, a modified Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), and a psychologic health inventory derived from the Hopkins Symptom Checklist were applied in 321 randomly selected men, ages 18-55. Each subject was evaluated for prior and current low-back pain (LBP) complaints by use of a modification of the McGill pain questionnaire. Subjects were then categorized as having no LBP (n = 106, 33%), moderate LBP (n = 144, 44.8%), and severe LBP (n = 71, 22.1%). Subjects were further subcategorized as not disabled (defined as equal or less than seven days of work lost in the previous year) and disabled (work loss greater than seven days in the prior year).

RESULTS

cumulative scores of the Hopkins Checklist showed that a mean score for no LBP equaled 2.5 +/- 2.9; moderate LBP was 4.3 +/- 3.2; and severe LBP was 4.6 +/- 3 (p = .0000). The disabled group was significantly different on both MMPI and Hopkins Checklist. The 20 disabled subjects had significant elevations of hypochondriasis (p = .0006) and hysteria (p = .005) when compared with nondisabled subjects with LBP. The mean score for disabled subjects on the Hopkins Checklist was 7.35 +/- 4.49, while the score was 4.17 +/- 3.15 (p = .0001) for the nondisabled subjects with LBP. In the general male population, patients with disabling LBP conditions form a distinctive subgroup comparable to those patients seen in selected LBP clinics.

摘要

未标注

对321名年龄在18至55岁之间随机选取的男性进行了生物力学测试、体格检查、脊柱X光片、改良的明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)以及源自霍普金斯症状清单的心理健康量表评估。通过对麦吉尔疼痛问卷进行修改,对每位受试者既往和当前的下背痛(LBP)主诉进行评估。然后将受试者分为无LBP组(n = 106,33%)、中度LBP组(n = 144,44.8%)和重度LBP组(n = 71,22.1%)。受试者进一步细分为未致残组(定义为上一年工作损失等于或少于7天)和致残组(上一年工作损失超过7天)。

结果

霍普金斯量表的累积得分显示,无LBP组的平均得分为2.5±2.9;中度LBP组为4.3±3.2;重度LBP组为4.6±3(p = 0.0000)。致残组在MMPI和霍普金斯量表上均有显著差异。与未致残的LBP受试者相比,20名致残受试者的疑病症(p = 0.0006)和癔症(p = 0.005)得分显著升高。致残受试者在霍普金斯量表上的平均得分为7.35±4.49,而未致残的LBP受试者的得分为4.17±3.15(p = 0.0001)。在一般男性人群中,致残性LBP患者形成了一个独特的亚组,与在特定LBP诊所所见的患者相当。

相似文献

1
Psychologic factors in low-back-pain disability.下背痛致残中的心理因素
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985 May(195):178-84.
2
A comparison between the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and the 'Mensana Clinic Back Pain Test' for validating the complaint of chronic back pain.明尼苏达多相人格调查表与“Mensana诊所背痛测试”在验证慢性背痛主诉方面的比较。
J Occup Med. 1988 Feb;30(2):98-102.
3
A review of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) with low back pain patients.对明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)在腰痛患者中的应用综述。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1982 Dec;5(4):171-7.
4
Changes in MMPI profile levels of chronic low back pain patients following successful treatment.成功治疗后慢性腰痛患者明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)剖面图水平的变化。
J Spinal Disord. 1990 Dec;3(4):353-5.
5
The Lumbar Spine Outcomes Questionnaire: its development and psychometric properties.腰椎脊柱结局问卷:其编制及心理测量学特性
Spine J. 2007 Jan-Feb;7(1):118-32. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.382. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
6
Musculoskeletal status and disability of MMPI profile subgroups among patients with low back pain.
Health Psychol. 1987;6(6):581-98. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.6.6.581.
7
Does personality at college entry predict number of reported pain conditions at mid-life? A longitudinal study.大学入学时的人格特征能否预测中年时报告的疼痛状况数量?一项纵向研究。
J Pain. 2005 Feb;6(2):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.001.
8
Duration of chronic pain and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: profiles of industrially injured workers.
J Occup Med. 1988 Oct;30(10):809-12. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198810000-00012.
9
Key characteristics of low back pain and disability in college-aged adults: a pilot study.青年成年人腰痛和残疾的主要特征:一项初步研究。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jul;93(7):1217-24. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
10
Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory profiles in persons with or without low back pain. A 20-year follow-up study.有或无腰痛人群的明尼苏达多相人格调查表剖析。一项20年的随访研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Dec 15;20(24):2716-20. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199512150-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between occupational loading and spine degeneration on imaging - a systematic review and meta-analysis.影像学上职业负荷与脊柱退变之间的关联——一项系统综述和荟萃分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Oct 27;20(1):489. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2835-2.
2
Predictors of dysfunction and health-related quality of life in the flexion pattern subgroup of patients with chronic lower back pain: The STROBE study.慢性下腰痛患者屈曲型亚组功能障碍及健康相关生活质量的预测因素:STROBE研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(29):e11363. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011363.
3
Back injury prevention programs: A critical review of the literature.
背部损伤预防计划:文献综述的批判性评价。
J Occup Rehabil. 1993 Sep;3(3):145-58. doi: 10.1007/BF01078284.
4
An identification of low back pain groups using biobehavioral variables.利用生物行为变量对腰痛进行分组。
J Occup Rehabil. 1992 Mar;2(1):19-33. doi: 10.1007/BF01078929.
5
Prediction of return to work by rehabilitation professionals.康复专业人员对重返工作岗位的预测。
J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Dec;1(4):271-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01073692.
6
Prior psychiatric problems in rehabilitation clients with work-related injuries.患有与工作相关损伤的康复客户既往的精神问题。
J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Sep;1(3):227-33. doi: 10.1007/BF01073459.
7
Psychological profile of females with chronic pelvic pain.慢性盆腔痛女性的心理特征。
Indian J Psychiatry. 1996 Oct;38(4):212-6.
8
Short-term exercise approaches on menopausal symptoms, psychological health, and quality of life in postmenopausal women.绝经后女性更年期症状、心理健康及生活质量的短期运动疗法
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010. doi: 10.1155/2010/274261. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
9
Recommendations for management of uncomplicated back pain in the workers' compensation system: a focus on functional restoration.工伤赔偿系统中单纯性背痛的管理建议:聚焦功能恢复。
J Chiropr Med. 2004 Autumn;3(4):129-37. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60100-1.
10
Physical ergonomics in low-back pain prevention.
J Occup Rehabil. 2001 Dec;11(4):309-19. doi: 10.1023/a:1013304826873.