Yale Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, 230 S. Frontage Road, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Key Lab of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 211 South Block, 16 Lincui Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, People's Republic of China.
CNS Drugs. 2019 Oct;33(10):971-980. doi: 10.1007/s40263-019-00662-y.
Roughly 80% of the symptom improvement experienced on antidepressants in clinical trials is also observed in the placebo comparison group. Understanding the correlates of placebo improvement and response is important to designing efficient and successful trials of future antidepressants.
The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate the magnitude of placebo symptom improvement and placebo response rates in second-generation antidepressant trials of depression, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
We searched PubMed on 10 June, 2016, with no date or language limits, to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials of second-generation antidepressants in adults with depression, anxiety, or obsessive-compulsive disorder. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to examine the magnitude of placebo symptom improvement using standardized mean difference and placebo response rate. Stratified subgroup analysis and meta-regression were utilized to examine the effect of diagnostic indication and correlates of placebo symptom improvement.
The meta-analysis included 164 trials involving 19,591 participants. Magnitude of placebo improvement and placebo response rates varied significantly between diagnostic indications. The magnitude of placebo improvement was much lower in obsessive-compulsive disorder (standardized mean difference = 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.79) than in depression (standardized mean difference = 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.32) or anxiety (standardized mean difference = 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.12) trials. There was a large amount of heterogeneity in placebo improvement between studies (Q = 899, df = 110, p < 0.001, I = 88%). A greater number of study sites and a later publication year were associated with a greater magnitude of placebo improvement and response rate. Presence of a placebo lead-in and absence of non-US sites were associated with a reduced magnitude of placebo improvement. Trial duration was positively associated with the magnitude of placebo improvement in depression trials but negatively associated with the magnitude of placebo improvement in anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder trials.
Magnitude of placebo symptom improvement differed significantly based on diagnostic indication with improvement being significantly less in obsessive-compulsive disorder than anxiety and depression. Some trial characteristics were associated with a greater magnitude of placebo improvement in trials across disorders but others were disorder specific.
临床试验中抗抑郁药物的 80%左右的症状改善也可在安慰剂对照组中观察到。了解安慰剂改善和反应的相关性对于设计未来抗抑郁药物的高效和成功试验很重要。
本荟萃分析的目的是研究第二代抗抑郁药治疗抑郁症、焦虑症和强迫症的临床试验中安慰剂症状改善的幅度和安慰剂反应率。
我们于 2016 年 6 月 10 日在 PubMed 上进行了无日期和语言限制的搜索,以确定成人抑郁症、焦虑症或强迫症的第二代抗抑郁药随机安慰剂对照试验。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析,使用标准化均数差和安慰剂反应率来检查安慰剂症状改善的幅度。分层亚组分析和荟萃回归用于检查诊断指标和安慰剂症状改善的相关性的影响。
荟萃分析包括 164 项试验,涉及 19591 名参与者。不同诊断指标之间安慰剂改善的幅度和安慰剂反应率差异显著。强迫症(标准化均数差=0.58,95%置信区间 0.36-0.79)的安慰剂改善幅度明显低于抑郁症(标准化均数差=1.22,95%置信区间 1.12-1.32)或焦虑症(标准化均数差=1.01,95%置信区间 0.90-1.12)试验。研究之间的安慰剂改善存在很大的异质性(Q=899,df=110,p<0.001,I=88%)。更多的研究地点和较晚的出版年份与更大的安慰剂改善幅度和反应率相关。存在安慰剂导入期和没有非美国研究地点与安慰剂改善幅度减小相关。试验持续时间与抑郁症试验中的安慰剂改善幅度呈正相关,但与焦虑症和强迫症试验中的安慰剂改善幅度呈负相关。
安慰剂症状改善的幅度根据诊断指标显著不同,强迫症的改善明显低于焦虑症和抑郁症。一些试验特征与跨疾病的安慰剂改善幅度更大相关,但其他特征与疾病特异性相关。