• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors, and Placebo for Common Psychiatric Disorders Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂及安慰剂治疗儿童和青少年常见精神障碍的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):1011-1020. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2432.
2
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress disorders: A 3-level network meta-analysis.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和 5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂治疗焦虑、强迫症和应激障碍:一个 3 级网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2021 Jun 10;18(6):e1003664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003664. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for the prevention of tension-type headache in adults.用于预防成人紧张型头痛的选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 1;2015(5):CD011681. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011681.
4
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for the prevention of migraine in adults.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)用于预防成人偏头痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 1;4(4):CD002919. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002919.pub3.
5
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
6
Incidence of adverse events and comparative tolerability of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂和 5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂治疗焦虑、强迫症和应激障碍的不良事件发生率和相对耐受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jul;53(9):3783-3792. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723001630. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
7
Antidepressant Tolerability in Pediatric Anxiety and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorders: A Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling Meta-analysis.儿童焦虑和强迫症中抗抑郁药的耐受性:贝叶斯分层建模荟萃分析。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Nov;59(11):1240-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.10.013. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
Antidepressants versus placebo for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD).抗抑郁药与安慰剂治疗广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 30;1(1):CD012942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012942.pub2.
9
Vortioxetine for depression in adults.伏硫西汀用于成人抑郁症治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2.
10
Comparison of agomelatine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized clinical trials.阿戈美拉汀与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂/5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂治疗重度抑郁症的比较:一项头对头随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;48(7):663-71. doi: 10.1177/0004867414525837. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacogenetic Testing of Children and Adolescents with Mental Health Conditions: Real-World Experiences.患有精神健康疾病的儿童和青少年的药物遗传学检测:真实世界经验
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Aug 8;18(8):1170. doi: 10.3390/ph18081170.
2
Dynamics of cerebral blood flow following sertraline treatment in adolescent depression.舍曲林治疗青少年抑郁症后脑血流量的动态变化
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 18;16:1521565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1521565. eCollection 2025.
3
From stress to anhedonia: differential gene expression, behavioural and biochemical modulations in resilient versus susceptible mice in an ultrasound model of juvenile depression.从应激到快感缺失:青少年抑郁症超声模型中, resilient 小鼠与易感小鼠的差异基因表达、行为及生化调节
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1007/s00702-025-02974-4.
4
Time-to-Onset Analysis of Rhabdomyolysis Associated With Selective Serotonin and Serotonin-Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.利用日本药物警戒数据库对与选择性5-羟色胺及5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂相关的横纹肌溶解症进行发病时间分析。
In Vivo. 2025 Jul-Aug;39(4):2115-2122. doi: 10.21873/invivo.14007.
5
The effect of the art therapy interventions to alleviate depression symptoms among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.艺术治疗干预对缓解儿童和青少年抑郁症状的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2025 May 13;80:100683. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2025.100683. eCollection 2025.
6
polysaccharide modulates the gut microbiota and metabolites of patients with major depressive disorder in an fermentation model: a pilot study.在发酵模型中,多糖对重度抑郁症患者的肠道微生物群和代谢产物的调节作用:一项初步研究。
Front Nutr. 2025 Apr 28;12:1587742. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1587742. eCollection 2025.
7
Comparative efficacy of antidepressant medication for adolescent depression: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.抗抑郁药物治疗青少年抑郁症的比较疗效:一项网状Meta分析和系统评价。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 May 10;25(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06941-x.
8
Possible GABAkine-Mediated Sedative-Like Antidepressant Effects of Phytol: Molecular Interventions Through In Vitro, In Vivo and In Silico Approaches.植物醇可能通过γ-氨基丁酸类似物介导的镇静样抗抑郁作用:体外、体内和计算机模拟方法的分子干预
CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Mar;31(3):e70350. doi: 10.1111/cns.70350.
9
Structural basis of vilazodone dual binding mode to the serotonin transporter.维拉唑酮与血清素转运体双重结合模式的结构基础
Res Sq. 2025 Jan 20:rs.3.rs-5671197. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5671197/v1.
10
Painfully Sensitive: How Sensory Processing Sensitivity Affects Healthy Adolescents' Perception of Pain.极度敏感:感觉加工敏感性如何影响健康青少年对疼痛的感知
J Pain Res. 2025 Feb 15;18:719-733. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S473575. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Obsessive-compulsive disorder has a reduced placebo (and antidepressant) response compared to other anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis.与其他焦虑症相比,强迫症的安慰剂(和抗抑郁药)反应较低:一项荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 15;218:217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.068. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
2
What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice.五十年来有关青少年心理治疗效果的研究告诉了我们什么:多层次元分析及对科学和实践的启示。
Am Psychol. 2017 Feb-Mar;72(2):79-117. doi: 10.1037/a0040360.
3
Is the perceived placebo effect comparable between adults and children? A meta-regression analysis.成人和儿童所感受到的安慰剂效应是否具有可比性?一项元回归分析。
Pediatr Res. 2017 Jan;81(1-1):11-17. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.181. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
4
Augmenting Cognitive Behavior Therapy for School Refusal with Fluoxetine: A Randomized Controlled Trial.用氟西汀增强针对学校拒绝行为的认知行为疗法:一项随机对照试验。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2017 Jun;48(3):485-497. doi: 10.1007/s10578-016-0675-y.
5
Comparative efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年重性抑郁障碍的疗效和耐受性比较:网状荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2016 Aug 27;388(10047):881-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30385-3. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
6
Update on the Use of SSRIs and SNRIs with Children and Adolescents in Clinical Practice.临床实践中5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)和5-羟色胺去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRI)在儿童及青少年中的应用进展
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Winter;25(1):4-10. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
7
Placebo Response in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders: Implications for Clinical Trial Design and Interpretation.儿童焦虑症中的安慰剂反应:对临床试验设计与解读的启示
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2016 Oct;26(8):686-693. doi: 10.1089/cap.2015.0192. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
8
Suicidality and aggression during antidepressant treatment: systematic review and meta-analyses based on clinical study reports.抗抑郁治疗期间的自杀倾向和攻击行为:基于临床研究报告的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2016 Jan 27;352:i65. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i65.
9
Restoring Study 329: efficacy and harms of paroxetine and imipramine in treatment of major depression in adolescence.恢复性研究329:帕罗西汀和丙咪嗪治疗青少年重度抑郁症的疗效与危害。
BMJ. 2015 Sep 16;351:h4320. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4320.
10
Have Treatment Studies of Depression Become Even Less Generalizable? A Review of the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Used in Placebo-Controlled Antidepressant Efficacy Trials Published During the Past 20 Years.过去 20 年发表的安慰剂对照抗抑郁疗效试验中使用的纳入和排除标准:抑郁症治疗研究的可推广性是否变得更差了?一项综述。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Sep;90(9):1180-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Aug 12.

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂及安慰剂治疗儿童和青少年常见精神障碍的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy and Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors, and Placebo for Common Psychiatric Disorders Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Locher Cosima, Koechlin Helen, Zion Sean R, Werner Christoph, Pine Daniel S, Kirsch Irving, Kessler Ronald C, Kossowsky Joe

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):1011-1020. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2432.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2432
PMID:28854296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5667359/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Depressive disorders (DDs), anxiety disorders (ADs), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are common mental disorders in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relative efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and placebo for the treatment of DD, AD, OCD, and PTSD in children and adolescents.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database from inception through August 7, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Published and unpublished randomized clinical trials of SSRIs or SNRIs in youths with DD, AD, OCD, or PTSD were included. Trials using other antidepressants (eg, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors) were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Effect sizes, calculated as standardized mean differences (Hedges g) and risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events, were assessed in a random-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes, as defined by authors on preintervention and postintervention data, mean change data, and adverse event data, were extracted independently by multiple observers following PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-six trials were eligible, including 6778 participants (3484 [51.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 12.9 [5.1] years); 17 studies for DD, 10 for AD, 8 for OCD, and 1 for PTSD. Analysis showed that SSRIs and SNRIs were significantly more beneficial compared with placebo, yielding a small effect size (g = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.25-0.40; P < .001). Anxiety disorder (g = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.72; P < .001) showed significantly larger between-group effect sizes than DD (g = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.13-0.27; P < .001). This difference was driven primarily by the placebo response: patients with DD exhibited significantly larger placebo responses (g = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.36-1.78; P < .001) compared with those with AD (g = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84-1.21; P < .001). The SSRIs produced a relatively large effect size for ADs (g = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97; P < .001). Compared with participants receiving placebo, patients receiving an antidepressant reported significantly more treatment-emergent adverse events (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P = .01 or RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22-1.82; P < .001, depending on the reporting method), severe adverse events (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.34-2.32; P < .001), and study discontinuation due to adverse events (RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.38-2.32; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Compared with placebo, SSRIs and SNRIs are more beneficial than placebo in children and adolescents; however, the benefit is small and disorder specific, yielding a larger drug-placebo difference for AD than for other conditions. Response to placebo is large, especially in DD. Severe adverse events are significantly more common with SSRIs and SNRIs than placebo.

摘要

重要性

抑郁症(DDs)、焦虑症(ADs)、强迫症(OCD)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是儿童和青少年常见的精神障碍。

目的

研究选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)、5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)及安慰剂治疗儿童和青少年DD、AD、OCD和PTSD的相对疗效与安全性。

数据来源

自数据库创建至2016年8月7日的PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、科学引文索引及考克兰系统评价数据库。

研究选择

纳入已发表和未发表的关于SSRIs或SNRIs治疗患有DD、AD、OCD或PTSD青少年的随机临床试验。排除使用其他抗抑郁药(如三环类抗抑郁药、单胺氧化酶抑制剂)的试验。

数据提取与综合分析

采用随机效应模型评估效应量,以标准化均数差(Hedges g)和不良事件风险比(RRs)计算。

主要结局指标

由作者根据干预前和干预后数据、平均变化数据及不良事件数据定义的主要结局,由多名观察者按照系统评价和Meta分析优先报告条目(PRISMA)指南独立提取。

结果

36项试验符合要求,包括6778名参与者(3484名[51.4%]女性;平均[标准差]年龄为12.9[5.1]岁);17项针对DD的研究,10项针对AD的研究,8项针对OCD的研究,1项针对PTSD的研究。分析表明,与安慰剂相比,SSRIs和SNRIs显著更有益,效应量较小(g = 0.32;95%CI,0.25 - 0.40;P <.001)。焦虑症(g = 0.56;95%CI,0.40 - 0.72;P <.001)组间效应量显著大于DD(g = 0.20;95%CI,0.13 - 0.27;P <.001)。这种差异主要由安慰剂反应驱动:与AD患者(g = 1.03;95%CI,0.84 - 1.21;P <.001)相比,DD患者的安慰剂反应显著更大(g = 1.57;95%CI,1.36 - 1.78;P <.001)。SSRIs对ADs产生的效应量相对较大(g = 0.71;95%CI,0.45 - 0.97;P <.001)。与接受安慰剂的参与者相比,接受抗抑郁药治疗的患者报告的治疗中出现的不良事件显著更多(RR,1.07;95%CI,1.01 - 1.12;P = 0.01或RR,1.49;95%CI,1.22 - 1.82;P <.001,取决于报告方法)、严重不良事件(RR,1.76;95%CI,1.34 - 2.32;P <.001)以及因不良事件导致的研究中止(RR,1.79;95%CI,1.38 - 2.32;P <.001)。

结论与意义

与安慰剂相比,SSRIs和SNRIs对儿童和青少年更有益;然而,益处较小且具有疾病特异性,AD的药物 - 安慰剂差异大于其他疾病。对安慰剂的反应较大,尤其是在DD中。SSRIs和SNRIs导致的严重不良事件显著多于安慰剂。