Suppr超能文献

选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂、5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂及安慰剂治疗儿童和青少年常见精神障碍的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy and Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors, and Placebo for Common Psychiatric Disorders Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Locher Cosima, Koechlin Helen, Zion Sean R, Werner Christoph, Pine Daniel S, Kirsch Irving, Kessler Ronald C, Kossowsky Joe

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):1011-1020. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.2432.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Depressive disorders (DDs), anxiety disorders (ADs), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are common mental disorders in children and adolescents.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relative efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and placebo for the treatment of DD, AD, OCD, and PTSD in children and adolescents.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database from inception through August 7, 2016.

STUDY SELECTION

Published and unpublished randomized clinical trials of SSRIs or SNRIs in youths with DD, AD, OCD, or PTSD were included. Trials using other antidepressants (eg, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors) were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Effect sizes, calculated as standardized mean differences (Hedges g) and risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events, were assessed in a random-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes, as defined by authors on preintervention and postintervention data, mean change data, and adverse event data, were extracted independently by multiple observers following PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-six trials were eligible, including 6778 participants (3484 [51.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 12.9 [5.1] years); 17 studies for DD, 10 for AD, 8 for OCD, and 1 for PTSD. Analysis showed that SSRIs and SNRIs were significantly more beneficial compared with placebo, yielding a small effect size (g = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.25-0.40; P < .001). Anxiety disorder (g = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.72; P < .001) showed significantly larger between-group effect sizes than DD (g = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.13-0.27; P < .001). This difference was driven primarily by the placebo response: patients with DD exhibited significantly larger placebo responses (g = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.36-1.78; P < .001) compared with those with AD (g = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84-1.21; P < .001). The SSRIs produced a relatively large effect size for ADs (g = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97; P < .001). Compared with participants receiving placebo, patients receiving an antidepressant reported significantly more treatment-emergent adverse events (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P = .01 or RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22-1.82; P < .001, depending on the reporting method), severe adverse events (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.34-2.32; P < .001), and study discontinuation due to adverse events (RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.38-2.32; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Compared with placebo, SSRIs and SNRIs are more beneficial than placebo in children and adolescents; however, the benefit is small and disorder specific, yielding a larger drug-placebo difference for AD than for other conditions. Response to placebo is large, especially in DD. Severe adverse events are significantly more common with SSRIs and SNRIs than placebo.

摘要

重要性

抑郁症(DDs)、焦虑症(ADs)、强迫症(OCD)和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是儿童和青少年常见的精神障碍。

目的

研究选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)、5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)及安慰剂治疗儿童和青少年DD、AD、OCD和PTSD的相对疗效与安全性。

数据来源

自数据库创建至2016年8月7日的PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、科学引文索引及考克兰系统评价数据库。

研究选择

纳入已发表和未发表的关于SSRIs或SNRIs治疗患有DD、AD、OCD或PTSD青少年的随机临床试验。排除使用其他抗抑郁药(如三环类抗抑郁药、单胺氧化酶抑制剂)的试验。

数据提取与综合分析

采用随机效应模型评估效应量,以标准化均数差(Hedges g)和不良事件风险比(RRs)计算。

主要结局指标

由作者根据干预前和干预后数据、平均变化数据及不良事件数据定义的主要结局,由多名观察者按照系统评价和Meta分析优先报告条目(PRISMA)指南独立提取。

结果

36项试验符合要求,包括6778名参与者(3484名[51.4%]女性;平均[标准差]年龄为12.9[5.1]岁);17项针对DD的研究,10项针对AD的研究,8项针对OCD的研究,1项针对PTSD的研究。分析表明,与安慰剂相比,SSRIs和SNRIs显著更有益,效应量较小(g = 0.32;95%CI,0.25 - 0.40;P <.001)。焦虑症(g = 0.56;95%CI,0.40 - 0.72;P <.001)组间效应量显著大于DD(g = 0.20;95%CI,0.13 - 0.27;P <.001)。这种差异主要由安慰剂反应驱动:与AD患者(g = 1.03;95%CI,0.84 - 1.21;P <.001)相比,DD患者的安慰剂反应显著更大(g = 1.57;95%CI,1.36 - 1.78;P <.001)。SSRIs对ADs产生的效应量相对较大(g = 0.71;95%CI,0.45 - 0.97;P <.001)。与接受安慰剂的参与者相比,接受抗抑郁药治疗的患者报告的治疗中出现的不良事件显著更多(RR,1.07;95%CI,1.01 - 1.12;P = 0.01或RR,1.49;95%CI,1.22 - 1.82;P <.001,取决于报告方法)、严重不良事件(RR,1.76;95%CI,1.34 - 2.32;P <.001)以及因不良事件导致的研究中止(RR,1.79;95%CI,1.38 - 2.32;P <.001)。

结论与意义

与安慰剂相比,SSRIs和SNRIs对儿童和青少年更有益;然而,益处较小且具有疾病特异性,AD的药物 - 安慰剂差异大于其他疾病。对安慰剂的反应较大,尤其是在DD中。SSRIs和SNRIs导致的严重不良事件显著多于安慰剂。

相似文献

5
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
8
Antidepressants versus placebo for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD).抗抑郁药与安慰剂治疗广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 30;1(1):CD012942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012942.pub2.
9
Vortioxetine for depression in adults.伏硫西汀用于成人抑郁症治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验