Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Department of Statistics, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 1;14(10):e0222669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222669. eCollection 2019.
Financial sanctions are often thought of as the "soft alternative" to armed conflict and are widely used in the 21st century. Nonetheless, sanctions are often criticized for being non-specific in their action, and having impact beyond their intended remit. One often-overlooked area affected by sanctions are academic systems of research and education. Sanctions place "invisible barriers" for research in these countries by limiting access to necessary resources and curtailing their effective use. In this paper we present a national survey of Sudanese academics focused on the impact of 20 years of economic sanctions on their work. It identifies key areas of academic research and education that have been impacted by international sanctions. Moreover, these data highlight how the impact of sanctions on academia is likely to persist long after they are formally lifted. The paper concludes by problematising the current interpretation of jus post bellum, or moral behaviour after conflict. It suggests that the responsibility to make reparations in the form of support for academic systems applies to countries who impose economic sanctions.
金融制裁通常被视为“软手段”,是对武装冲突的替代,在 21 世纪被广泛应用。然而,制裁常常因其行动缺乏针对性、影响超出预期范围而受到批评。一个经常被忽视的受制裁影响的领域是学术研究和教育系统。制裁通过限制获取必要资源和限制有效利用,在这些国家的研究中设置了“无形的障碍”。本文通过对苏丹学者进行全国性调查,研究了 20 年的经济制裁对他们工作的影响。它确定了受到国际制裁影响的学术研究和教育的关键领域。此外,这些数据突出了制裁对学术界的影响可能在正式解除制裁后很长一段时间内持续存在。本文最后对后冲突时代的正义(jus post bellum),或冲突后的道德行为的现行解释提出了质疑。它表明,以支持学术体系的形式进行赔偿的责任适用于实施经济制裁的国家。