Suppr超能文献

重新思考公平数据中的“A”:研究中的数据访问与可及性问题

Rethinking the A in FAIR Data: Issues of Data Access and Accessibility in Research.

作者信息

Shanahan Hugh, Bezuidenhout Louise

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Royal Holloway University of London, London, United Kingdom.

DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services), The Hague, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Jul 27;7:912456. doi: 10.3389/frma.2022.912456. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The FAIR data principles are rapidly becoming a standard through which to assess responsible and reproducible research. In contrast to the requirements associated with the Interoperability principle, the requirements associated with the Accessibility principle are often assumed to be relatively straightforward to implement. Indeed, a variety of different tools assessing FAIR rely on the data being deposited in a trustworthy digital repository. In this paper we note that there is an implicit assumption that access to a repository is independent of where the user is geographically located. Using a virtual personal network (VPN) service we find that access to a set of web sites that underpin Open Science is variable from a set of 14 countries; either through connectivity issues (i.e., connections to download HTML being dropped) or through direct blocking (i.e., web servers sending 403 error codes). Many of the countries included in this study are already marginalized from Open Science discussions due to political issues or infrastructural challenges. This study clearly indicates that access to FAIR data resources is influenced by a range of geo-political factors. Given the volatile nature of politics and the slow pace of infrastructural investment, this is likely to continue to be an issue and indeed may grow. We propose that it is essential for discussions and implementations of FAIR to include awareness of these issues of accessibility. Without this awareness, the expansion of FAIR data may unintentionally reinforce current access inequities and research inequalities around the globe.

摘要

FAIR数据原则正迅速成为评估负责任且可重复研究的标准。与互操作性原则相关的要求不同,可访问性原则相关的要求通常被认为实施起来相对简单。事实上,各种评估FAIR的不同工具都依赖于将数据存放在可信的数字存储库中。在本文中,我们指出存在一个隐含的假设,即对存储库的访问与用户的地理位置无关。通过使用虚拟专用网络(VPN)服务,我们发现从14个国家访问支持开放科学的一组网站存在差异;要么是由于连接问题(即下载HTML的连接中断),要么是由于直接封锁(即网络服务器发送403错误代码)。由于政治问题或基础设施挑战,本研究中包括的许多国家已经在开放科学讨论中处于边缘地位。这项研究清楚地表明,对FAIR数据资源的访问受到一系列地缘政治因素的影响。鉴于政治的波动性和基础设施投资的缓慢步伐,这可能会继续成为一个问题,而且实际上可能会加剧。我们建议,对于FAIR的讨论和实施,必须认识到这些可访问性问题。如果没有这种认识,FAIR数据的扩展可能会无意中加剧全球目前的访问不平等和研究不平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db0f/9363602/17a367b8a39f/frma-07-912456-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验