Xiao Zhifeng, Chen Meizhu, Wu Shaopeng, Xie Jun, Kong Dezhi, Qiao Zhi, Niu Changchang
State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Inner Mongolia Comprehensive Transportation Science Research Institute Co., Ltd., Inner Mongolia 010000, China.
Materials (Basel). 2019 Sep 30;12(19):3211. doi: 10.3390/ma12193211.
The primary objective of this paper was to investigate the effect of replacing steel slag powder (SSP) with limestone filler (LF) with different contents as an inorganic anti-stripping agent on the moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures. Two traditional inorganic anti-stripping agents were selected for comparison, namely cement (CE) and slaked lime (SL). Apparent morphology, chemical compositions, and the particle size distribution of the four fillers were firstly studied. LF was replaced by SSP, CE, and SL with different contents, and then mixed with asphalt to prepare asphalt mortars. An 80 °C water immersion test was conducted to investigate the adhesion of asphalt mortar and aggregates, and an image analysis technique was utilized to evaluate the stripping of asphalt from the aggregates. A Marshall stability test and freeze-thaw split test were then conducted to analyze the effect of different fillers on the moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures. The results show that SSP contains a large amount of CaO, which indicates that SSP has a certain alkalinity. Compared with LF, SSP has a rougher surface texture and a finer particle size. Image analysis results show that the partially replacement of LF by SSP increases the asphalt coverage rate of aggregates, which means that SSP can improve the adhesion between asphalt mortar and aggregates. However, the excessive addition of SSP will result in a decrease in adhesion. The results of both the Marshall stability test and freeze-thaw split test demonstrate that CE, SL, and SSP can improve the moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures compared with the LF group, and that asphalt mixtures containing SSP have better moisture damage resistance than those with CE, but less such resistance than those with SL. With the increase of the amount of SSP replacing LF, the moisture susceptibility of the asphalt mixture decreases gradually. The optimum substitution amount of SSP was 25% of the total volume of fillers in this test.
本文的主要目的是研究用不同含量的石灰石填料(LF)替代钢渣粉(SSP)作为无机抗剥落剂对沥青混合料水敏感性的影响。选择了两种传统无机抗剥落剂进行对比,即水泥(CE)和消石灰(SL)。首先研究了这四种填料的表观形态、化学成分和粒度分布。用不同含量的SSP、CE和SL替代LF,然后与沥青混合制备沥青胶浆。进行80℃水浸试验以研究沥青胶浆与集料的粘附性,并利用图像分析技术评估沥青从集料上的剥落情况。接着进行马歇尔稳定度试验和冻融劈裂试验,以分析不同填料对沥青混合料水敏感性的影响。结果表明,SSP含有大量CaO,这表明SSP具有一定的碱性。与LF相比,SSP的表面纹理更粗糙,粒度更细。图像分析结果表明,用SSP部分替代LF可提高集料的沥青覆盖率,这意味着SSP可改善沥青胶浆与集料之间的粘附性。然而,过量添加SSP会导致粘附性下降。马歇尔稳定度试验和冻融劈裂试验的结果均表明,与LF组相比,CE、SL和SSP均可提高沥青混合料的水敏感性,且含SSP的沥青混合料的抗水损害性能优于含CE的沥青混合料,但低于含SL的沥青混合料。随着SSP替代LF量的增加,沥青混合料的水敏感性逐渐降低。在本试验中,SSP的最佳替代量为填料总体积的25%。