Suppr超能文献

回顾性评估了 36 只猫(2014-2018 年)输注新鲜冷冻血浆的适应证、安全性和效果。

Retrospective evaluation of the indications, safety and effects of fresh frozen plasma transfusions in 36 cats (2014-2018).

机构信息

Emergency and Critical Care Service, BluePearl Veterinary Partners, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Feline Med Surg. 2020 Aug;22(8):696-704. doi: 10.1177/1098612X19876728. Epub 2019 Oct 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goals of this study were to classify the indications, risks, effects on coagulation times and outcomes of cats receiving fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions in clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of FFP transfusions administered in two referral hospitals from 2014 to 2018. Transfusion administration forms and medical records were reviewed. Information was collected on indication, underlying condition, coagulation times and signs of transfusion reactions. Seven-day outcomes after FFP administration were also evaluated when available.

RESULTS

Thirty-six cats received 54 FFP transfusions. Ninety-four percent of cats were administered FFP for treatment of a coagulopathy. Twenty cats had paired coagulation testing before and after FFP administration. Eighteen of these cats had improved coagulation times after receiving 1-3 units of FFP. Eight of the 36 cats had probable transfusion reactions (14.8% of 54 FFP transfusions). These reactions included respiratory signs (n = 4), fever (n = 2) and gastrointestinal signs (n = 2). Five of the eight cats with probable reactions had received packed red blood cells contemporaneously. Overall mortality rate during hospitalization was 29.7%, with 52.8% (n = 19/36) of cats confirmed to be alive 7 days after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This retrospective study shows that FFP transfusions improve coagulation times in cats. Transfusion reactions are a risk, and risk-benefit ratios must be measured prior to administration and possible reactions monitored. In the study cats, the FFP transfusions appeared to be a tolerable risk given the benefit to prolonged coagulation times.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对临床实践中接受新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)输注的猫的适应证、风险、对凝血时间的影响和结局进行分类。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2014 年至 2018 年在两家转诊医院接受 FFP 输注的猫。回顾了输血申请表和病历。收集了适应证、基础疾病、凝血时间和输血反应迹象的信息。当有可用数据时,还评估了 FFP 给药后 7 天的结局。

结果

36 只猫接受了 54 次 FFP 输注。94%的猫因凝血功能障碍接受 FFP 治疗。20 只猫在接受 FFP 治疗前后进行了配对凝血检测。这 18 只猫在接受 1-3 单位 FFP 后凝血时间得到改善。36 只猫中有 8 只(54 次 FFP 输注中的 14.8%)可能发生了输血反应。这些反应包括呼吸迹象(n=4)、发热(n=2)和胃肠道迹象(n=2)。8 只可能有反应的猫中有 5 只同时接受了浓缩红细胞输注。住院期间总体死亡率为 29.7%,出院后 7 天有 52.8%(n=19/36)的猫被确认为存活。

结论和相关性

这项回顾性研究表明,FFP 输注可改善猫的凝血时间。输血反应是一种风险,在给药前和可能的反应发生时必须权衡利弊。在研究猫中,FFP 输注似乎是可以接受的风险,因为它延长了凝血时间。

相似文献

1
Retrospective evaluation of the indications, safety and effects of fresh frozen plasma transfusions in 36 cats (2014-2018).
J Feline Med Surg. 2020 Aug;22(8):696-704. doi: 10.1177/1098612X19876728. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
2
Retrospective evaluation of fresh frozen plasma use in 121 cats: 2009-2016.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2020 Sep;30(5):558-566. doi: 10.1111/vec.12972. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
3
Clinical use of blood products in cats: a retrospective study (1997--2000).
J Vet Intern Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;18(4):529-32. doi: 10.1892/0891-6640(2004)18<529:cuobpi>2.0.co;2.
5
Why is fresh-frozen plasma transfused?
Transfusion. 1986 Jan-Feb;26(1):107-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1986.26186124011.x.
6
Development and implementation of a hemovigilance program at a university veterinary teaching hospital.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2022 May;32(3):315-321. doi: 10.1111/vec.13179. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
Fresh Frozen Plasma Use in a Neonatal Unit in South Africa.
J Trop Pediatr. 2015 Aug;61(4):266-71. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmv027. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
8
Whole blood transfusions in 91 cats: a clinical evaluation.
J Feline Med Surg. 2004 Jun;6(3):139-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jfms.2004.01.005.
9
Red blood cell transfusions in cats: 126 cases (1999).
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Mar 15;226(6):920-3. doi: 10.2460/javma.2005.226.920.
10
Effects of platelet and plasma transfusion on outcome in traumatic brain injury patients with moderate bleeding diatheses.
J Neurosurg. 2013 Mar;118(3):676-86. doi: 10.3171/2012.11.JNS12622. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

2
Colloids Yes or No? - a "Gretchen Question" Answered.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jul 2;8:624049. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.624049. eCollection 2021.
3
2021 ISFM Consensus Guidelines on the Collection and Administration of Blood and Blood Products in Cats.
J Feline Med Surg. 2021 May;23(5):410-432. doi: 10.1177/1098612X211007071.

本文引用的文献

3
Update on Canine and Feline Blood Donor Screening for Blood-Borne Pathogens.
J Vet Intern Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;30(1):15-35. doi: 10.1111/jvim.13823.
4
Effect of premedication and other factors on the occurrence of acute transfusion reactions in dogs.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):620-30. doi: 10.1111/vec.12327. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
5
Fresh frozen plasma transfusion fails to influence the hemostatic balance in critically ill patients with a coagulopathy.
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Jun;13(6):989-97. doi: 10.1111/jth.12908. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
6
Controversies in the use of fresh frozen plasma in critically ill small animal patients.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1):101-6. doi: 10.1111/vec.12280. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
9
Use of plasma in the management of central nervous system bleeding: evidence-based consensus recommendations.
Adv Ther. 2014 Jan;31(1):66-90. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0083-7. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
10
Transfusion medicine in small animals.
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2013 Jul;43(4):735-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2013.03.007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验