Suppr超能文献

美洛昔康术前与术后给药对关节镜膝关节手术疼痛控制、患者整体状况改善及膝关节功能恢复的影响

Early preoperative versus postoperative administration of meloxicam in pain control, patient global status improvement, knee function recovery of arthroscopic knee surgery.

作者信息

Hou Junde, Li Wei, Chen Yongxue, Yang Liping, Li Liying, Zhao Lu

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Handan Central Hospital, Handan, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(40):e17133. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017133.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety between early preoperative administration and postoperative administration of oral meloxicam in patients underwent arthroscopic knee surgery (AKS).

METHODS

Totally 296 patients with the intention to undergo AKS were recruited and randomly allocated as 1:1 ratio into early preoperative analgesia (EPA) group and postoperative analgesia (POA) group. Pain visual analog scale (VAS) score and severity (at rest and at flexion), patient global assessment (PGA) score, the consumption of rescue analgesia (pethidine), and adverse events were evaluated during the perioperation. And knee range of motion (ROM), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and Lysholm score were assessed at baseline and at 3 months after AKS.

RESULTS

Both pain VAS score and severity (at rest and at flexion) were decreased at 4, 8, and 12 hours, but similar at -24, -2, 24, 36, and 48 hours after AKS in EPA group compared with POA group. Besides, PGA score was lower at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours, but similar at -24, -2, 36, and 48 hours after AKS in EPA group compared with POA group. As to the consumption of pethidine in perioperative period, it was decreased in EPA group compared with POA group. No difference was observed in knee ROM, IKDC score, Lysholm score, and adverse effects between EPA group and POA group.

CONCLUSION

Early preoperative administration of meloxicam was a superior approach in pain control compared with postoperative administration in treating patients underwent AKS.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在调查接受膝关节镜手术(AKS)的患者术前早期口服美洛昔康与术后口服美洛昔康在疗效和安全性方面的差异。

方法

共招募了296例拟行AKS的患者,并按1:1比例随机分为术前早期镇痛(EPA)组和术后镇痛(POA)组。在围手术期评估疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分及严重程度(静息时和屈曲时)、患者整体评估(PGA)评分、补救性镇痛药(哌替啶)的消耗量以及不良事件。在基线及AKS术后3个月评估膝关节活动范围(ROM)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分和Lysholm评分。

结果

与POA组相比,EPA组在AKS术后4、8和12小时时疼痛VAS评分及严重程度(静息时和屈曲时)均降低,但在术后-24、-2、24、36和48小时时相似。此外,与POA组相比,EPA组在AKS术后4、8、12和24小时时PGA评分较低,但在术后-24、-2、36和48小时时相似。至于围手术期哌替啶的消耗量,EPA组低于POA组。EPA组和POA组在膝关节ROM、IKDC评分、Lysholm评分及不良反应方面未观察到差异。

结论

在治疗接受AKS手术的患者时,与术后给药相比,术前早期给予美洛昔康在疼痛控制方面是一种更优的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验