• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年(≥80 岁)重症监护病房患者生命支持治疗的暂停或终止。

Withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy in older adults (≥ 80 years) admitted to the intensive care unit.

机构信息

Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, service de réanimation médicale, 184 rue du Faubourg Saint Antoine, 75012, Paris, France.

Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, INSERM, UMR_S 1136, 75013, Paris, France.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul;44(7):1027-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5196-7. Epub 2018 May 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-018-5196-7
PMID:29774388
Abstract

PURPOSE

To document and analyse the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment (LST) in a population of very old patients admitted to the ICU.

METHODS

This prospective study included intensive care patients aged ≥ 80 years in 309 ICUs from 21 European countries with 30-day mortality follow-up.

RESULTS

LST limitation was identified in 1356/5021 (27.2%) of patients: 15% had a withholding decision and 12.2% a withdrawal decision (including those with a previous withholding decision). Patients with LST limitation were older, more frail, more severely ill and less frequently electively admitted. Patients with withdrawal of LST were more frequently male and had a longer ICU length of stay. The ICU and 30-day mortality were, respectively, 29.1 and 53.1% in the withholding group and 82.2% and 93.1% in the withdrawal group. LST was less frequently limited in eastern and southern European countries than in northern Europe. The patient-independent factors associated with LST limitation were: acute ICU admission (OR 5.77, 95% CI 4.32-7.7), Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.78-2.42), increased age (each 5 years of increase in age had a OR of 1.22 (95% CI 1.12-1.34) and SOFA score [OR of 1.07 (95% CI 1.05-1.09 per point)]. The frequency of LST limitation was higher in countries with high GDP and was lower in religious countries.

CONCLUSIONS

The most important patient variables associated with the instigation of LST limitation were acute admission, frailty, age, admission SOFA score and country.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NTC03134807).

摘要

目的

记录和分析在 ICU 收治的非常高龄患者群体中,是否停止或撤回生命支持治疗(LST)的决策。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了来自 21 个欧洲国家的 309 个 ICU 中年龄≥80 岁的重症监护患者,进行了 30 天死亡率随访。

结果

在 5021 名患者中,有 1356 名(27.2%)患者存在 LST 限制:15%的患者做出了保留治疗的决定,12.2%的患者做出了撤回治疗的决定(包括之前做出保留治疗决定的患者)。限制 LST 的患者年龄更大,身体更虚弱,病情更严重,且更多为非择期入院。与限制 LST 的患者相比,接受撤回 LST 的患者更多为男性,且 ICU 住院时间更长。在保留治疗组,ICU 死亡率和 30 天死亡率分别为 29.1%和 53.1%,而在撤回治疗组,ICU 死亡率和 30 天死亡率分别为 82.2%和 93.1%。与北欧国家相比,东欧和南欧国家限制 LST 的情况较少见。与限制 LST 相关的患者独立因素包括:急性 ICU 入院(OR 5.77,95%CI 4.32-7.7)、临床虚弱量表(CFS)评分(OR 2.08,95%CI 1.78-2.42)、年龄增加(每增加 5 岁,OR 为 1.22(95%CI 1.12-1.34))和 SOFA 评分(OR 每增加 1 分,OR 为 1.07(95%CI 1.05-1.09))。在 GDP 较高的国家,限制 LST 的频率更高,而在宗教国家则更低。

结论

与启动 LST 限制最相关的重要患者变量包括急性入院、虚弱、年龄、入院时 SOFA 评分和国家。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov(注册号:NTC03134807)。

相似文献

1
Withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy in older adults (≥ 80 years) admitted to the intensive care unit.老年(≥80 岁)重症监护病房患者生命支持治疗的暂停或终止。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul;44(7):1027-1038. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5196-7. Epub 2018 May 17.
2
End-of-life practices in Hong Kong intensive care units: results from the Ethicus-2 study.香港重症监护病房的临终实践:Ethicus-2 研究结果。
Hong Kong Med J. 2024 Aug;30(4):300-309. doi: 10.12809/hkmj2310944. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Predictors and outcomes of withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Singapore: a multicentre observational study.新加坡重症监护病房维持生命治疗的 withhold 和 withdrawal 的预测因素及结果:一项多中心观察性研究
J Intensive Care. 2024 Mar 26;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00725-3.
4
US Physicians' Opinions about Distinctions between Withdrawing and Withholding Life-Sustaining Treatment.美国医生对撤除和 withholding 维持生命治疗之间区别的看法。 (注:“withholding”在这里直接保留英文,因为在医学语境中它有特定含义,暂未找到完全对应的简洁中文表述,直接用英文更准确传达原意)
J Relig Health. 2016 Oct;55(5):1596-606. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0171-x.
5
End-of-life decisions in Greek intensive care units: a multicenter cohort study.希腊重症监护病房的临终决策:一项多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R228. doi: 10.1186/cc9380. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
6
Decision-Making on Withholding or Withdrawing Life Support in the ICU: A Worldwide Perspective.重症监护病房中关于停止或撤销生命支持的决策:全球视角
Chest. 2017 Aug;152(2):321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.176. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Life-Sustaining Treatment Status at the Time of Death in a Japanese Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.日本儿科重症监护病房死亡时的生命维持治疗状态
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 May;35(5):767-771. doi: 10.1177/1049909117743474. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
8
Contribution of information about acute and geriatric characteristics to decisions about life-sustaining treatment for old patients in intensive care.信息对关于生活维持治疗的决定的贡献在深刻和老年特征关于老病人的关心。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02094-z.
9
Variations in end-of-life practices in intensive care units worldwide (Ethicus-2): a prospective observational study.全球重症监护病房临终实践的差异(Ethicus-2):一项前瞻性观察研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Oct;9(10):1101-1110. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00261-7. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
10
Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study.重症监护病房中撤除和停止生命支持:一项西班牙前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Nov;27(11):1744-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1111-7. Epub 2001 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognosis of Nonagenarian ICU Patients A Bayesian analysis of prospective European studies.九旬重症监护病房患者的预后:欧洲前瞻性研究的贝叶斯分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Jun 23;15(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01496-2.
2
1-year survival in critically ill elderly medical patients treated with a conservative or an invasive approach (OCTO-REVERSE study): a nationwide observational study.采用保守或侵入性方法治疗的老年重症内科患者的1年生存率(OCTO-REVERSE研究):一项全国性观察性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 May 22;15(5):e089835. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089835.
3
Status epilepticus in older adults: A critical review.

本文引用的文献

1
Correction to: Withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining therapy in older adults (≥ 80 years) admitted to the intensive care unit.对《重症监护病房中80岁及以上老年人生命维持治疗的 withhold 或 withdraw》的更正
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1598-1601. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5312-8.
2
Should this elderly patient be admitted to the ICU?这位老年患者应该住进重症监护病房吗?
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Nov;44(11):1926-1928. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5054-7. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
3
Attitudes of physicians towards the care of critically ill elderly patients - a European survey.
老年患者的癫痫持续状态:一项批判性综述。
Epilepsia. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1111/epi.18453.
4
Determinants of Limiting Life-Sustaining Treatment in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study in Korean Intensive Care Units.危重症 COVID-19 患者限制生命维持治疗的决定因素:韩国重症监护病房的多中心研究
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2025 Jul;88(3):557-565. doi: 10.4046/trd.2024.0137. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
5
End-of-life decision disparities according to the gross national income in critically ill patients: a secondary analysis of the ETHICUS-2 study.根据国民总收入分析重症患者临终决策差异:ETHICUS-2研究的二次分析
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Mar 8;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01419-1.
6
Goals of care discussions and treatment limitation decisions in European acute geriatric units: a one-day cross-sectional study.欧洲急性老年病科的照护目标讨论与治疗限制决策:一项为期一天的横断面研究。
Age Ageing. 2025 Feb 2;54(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaf026.
7
Regional differences in triage decisions affect hospital mortality among frail COVID-19 patients in the COvid MEdicaTion study.在“COVID-19医疗”研究中,分诊决策的地区差异影响了体弱的COVID-19患者的医院死亡率。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10540-2.
8
ICU Admission Preferences in the Hypothetical Event of Acute Critical Illness: A Survey of Very Old Norwegians and Their Next-of-Kins.急性危重病假设情况下的重症监护病房入住偏好:一项针对挪威高龄老人及其近亲的调查
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Dec 9;6(12):e1185. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001185. eCollection 2024 Dec 1.
9
Sublingual microcirculatory assessment on admission independently predicts the outcome of old intensive care patients suffering from shock.入院时舌下微循环评估可独立预测休克老年重症监护患者的结局。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 27;14(1):25668. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77357-y.
10
Limitations of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Croatia: a multicenter retrospective study.克罗地亚重症监护病房生命维持治疗的局限性:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Croat Med J. 2024 Aug 31;65(4):373-382. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.373.
欧洲一项关于医生对重症老年患者护理态度的调查。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Feb;62(2):207-219. doi: 10.1111/aas.13021. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
4
Admitting Elderly Patients to the Intensive Care Unit-Is it the Right Decision?收治老年患者进入重症监护病房——这是正确的决定吗?
JAMA. 2017 Oct 17;318(15):1443-1444. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.14535.
5
Effect of Systematic Intensive Care Unit Triage on Long-term Mortality Among Critically Ill Elderly Patients in France: A Randomized Clinical Trial.法国重症老年患者系统性重症监护病房分诊对长期死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA. 2017 Oct 17;318(15):1450-1459. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13889.
6
The impact of frailty on ICU and 30-day mortality and the level of care in very elderly patients (≥ 80 years).衰弱对 ICU 和 30 天死亡率以及超高龄患者(≥80 岁)护理水平的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Dec;43(12):1820-1828. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4940-8. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
7
Causes and Characteristics of Death in Intensive Care Units: A Prospective Multicenter Study.重症监护病房死亡原因及特征:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Anesthesiology. 2017 May;126(5):882-889. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001612.
8
The status of intensive care medicine research and a future agenda for very old patients in the ICU.重症监护医学研究的现状及 ICU 中非常老年患者的未来议程。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1319-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4718-z. Epub 2017 Feb 25.
9
Understanding variability of end-of-life care in the ICU for the elderly.了解老年患者重症监护病房临终关怀的变异性。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Jan;43(1):94-96. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4340-5. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage: Self-Fulfilling Prophecy or Accurate Prediction of Outcome?颅内出血患者生命维持治疗的撤除:自我实现的预言还是对预后的准确预测?
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun;44(6):1161-72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001570.