Research and Development Unit, FinnHEMS Ltd, WTC Helsinki Airport, Vantaa, Finland.
Emergency Medical Services, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Oct;62(9):1297-1303. doi: 10.1111/aas.13152. Epub 2018 May 29.
Dispatching Emergency Medical Services to treat patients with deteriorating health in nursing homes and primary care facilities is common in Finland. We examined the cardiac arrest patients to describe this phenomenon. We had a special interest in patients for whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was considered futile.
We conducted an observational study between 1 June 2013 and 31 May 2014 in the Pirkanmaa area. We included cases in which Emergency Medical Services participated in the treatment of cardiac arrest patients in nursing homes and primary care facilities.
Emergency Medical Services attended to a total of 355 cardiac arrest patients, and 65 patients (18%) met the inclusion criteria. The included patients were generally older than 65 years, but otherwise heterogeneous. Nineteen patients (29%) had a valid do-not-attempt-resuscitation order, but paramedics were not informed about it in 10 (53%) of those cases. Eight (12%) of the 65 patients survived to hospital admission and 3 (5%) survived to hospital discharge with a neurologically favourable outcome. Two patients were alive 90 days after the cardiac arrest; both were younger than 70 years of age and had ventricular fibrillation as primary rhythm. There were no survivors in nursing homes.
The do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders were often unavailable during a cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempt. Although resuscitation attempts were futile for patients in nursing homes, some patients in primary care facilities demonstrated a favourable outcome after cardiac arrest. Emergency Medical Services seem to be able to recognise potential survivors and focus resources on their treatment.
在芬兰,派遣紧急医疗服务(EMS)治疗养老院和初级保健机构中健康状况恶化的患者是很常见的。我们研究了心脏骤停患者,以描述这种现象。我们对那些被认为心肺复苏(CPR)无效的患者特别感兴趣。
我们在 2013 年 6 月 1 日至 2014 年 5 月 31 日期间在皮卡拉马地区进行了一项观察性研究。我们纳入了 EMS 参与养老院和初级保健机构心脏骤停患者治疗的病例。
EMS 共处理了 355 例心脏骤停患者,其中 65 例(18%)符合纳入标准。纳入的患者通常年龄在 65 岁以上,但其他方面存在异质性。19 例(29%)患者有有效的不尝试复苏(DNAR)医嘱,但在这 10 例(53%)中,急救人员并未被告知该医嘱。65 例患者中,有 8 例(12%)存活至入院,3 例(5%)存活至出院,神经功能预后良好。2 例患者在心脏骤停后 90 天仍存活,均年龄小于 70 岁,且初始节律为心室颤动。养老院中没有幸存者。
在进行心肺复苏尝试时,DNAR 医嘱往往无法获得。尽管养老院患者的复苏尝试无效,但初级保健机构的一些患者在心脏骤停后表现出良好的预后。EMS 似乎能够识别潜在的幸存者,并将资源集中在他们的治疗上。