Suppr超能文献

调查 Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale 的可行性和可靠性。

Investigating the feasibility and reliability of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale.

机构信息

Geriatric Medicine Research, Centre for Health Care of the Elderly, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax B3H 2E1, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 2E1, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2019 Nov 1;48(6):832-837. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz111.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale (PFFS) was designed as a simple and practical approach to the identification of frailty.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility and reliability of this visual image-based tool, when used by patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in clinical settings.

DESIGN

observational study.

SETTING

three outpatient geriatric healthcare settings.

SUBJECTS

patients (n = 132), caregivers (n = 84), clinic nurses (n = 7) and physicians (n = 10).

METHODS

the PFFS was administered to all patients. Where available, HCPs and caregivers completed the scale based on the patients' health. In the geriatric day hospital, the PFFS was completed on admission and administered again within 7-14 days. Time and level of assistance needed to complete the scale were recorded. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess test-retest and inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

mean time to complete the scale (minutes:seconds ± SD) was 4:30 ± 1:54 for patients, 3:13 ± 1:34 for caregivers, 1:28 ± 0:57 for nurses and 1:32 ± 1:40 for physicians. Most patients were able to complete the scale unassisted (64%). Mean patient PFFS score was 11.1 ± 5.3, mean caregiver score was 13.2 ± 6.3, mean nurse score was 10.7 ± 4.5 and mean physician score was 11.1 ± 5.6; caregiver scores were significantly higher than patient (P < 0.01), nurse (P < 0.001) and physician (P < 0.01) scores. Test-retest reliability was good for patients (ICC = 0.78, [95%CI = 0.67-0.86]) and nurses (ICC = 0.88 [0.80-0.93]). Inter-rater reliability between HCPs was also good (ICC = 0.75 [0.63-0.83]).

CONCLUSION

the PFFS is a feasible and reliable tool for use with patients, caregivers and HCPs in clinical settings. Further research on the validity and responsiveness of the tool is necessary.

摘要

背景

画框衰弱量表(PFFS)是一种简单实用的衰弱识别方法。

目的

调查患者、照护者和医护人员(HCP)在临床环境中使用这种基于视觉图像的工具的可行性和可靠性。

设计

观察性研究。

地点

三家门诊老年保健医疗机构。

受试者

患者(n=132)、照护者(n=84)、诊所护士(n=7)和医生(n=10)。

方法

对所有患者进行 PFFS 评估。有条件的情况下,HCP 和照护者根据患者的健康状况完成量表。在老年日间医院,入院时完成 PFFS 并在 7-14 天内再次进行。记录完成量表所需的时间和辅助程度。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和 95%置信区间(CI)评估重测信度和评分者间信度。

结果

患者完成量表的平均时间(分钟:秒±SD)为 4 分 30 秒±1 分 54 秒,照护者为 3 分 13 秒±1 分 34 秒,护士为 1 分 28 秒±0 分 57 秒,医生为 1 分 32 秒±1 分 40 秒。大多数患者无需辅助即可完成量表(64%)。患者的平均 PFFS 评分为 11.1±5.3,照护者为 13.2±6.3,护士为 10.7±4.5,医生为 11.1±5.6;照护者评分明显高于患者(P<0.01)、护士(P<0.001)和医生(P<0.01)评分。患者和护士的重测信度均良好(ICC=0.78[0.67-0.86])。HCP 之间的评分者间信度也较好(ICC=0.75[0.63-0.83])。

结论

PFFS 是一种在临床环境中患者、照护者和 HCP 使用可行且可靠的工具。需要进一步研究该工具的有效性和反应性。

相似文献

1
Investigating the feasibility and reliability of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale.
Age Ageing. 2019 Nov 1;48(6):832-837. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz111.
2
Validation of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale in a memory clinic setting.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Sep;32(9):1063-1072. doi: 10.1017/S1041610219000905. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
4
Validation of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale in a Thoracic Surgery Clinic.
Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):e1150-e1156. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005381. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
5
Reliability, Validity, and Feasibility of the Frail-VIG Index.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):5187. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105187.
6
Inter-rater reliability of the Clinical Frailty Scale by staff members in a Swedish emergency department setting.
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Dec;29(12):1431-1437. doi: 10.1111/acem.14603. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
7
Translation of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale Into the Greek Language and Examination of Its Validity and Reliability.
Cureus. 2023 Jul 8;15(7):e41553. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41553. eCollection 2023 Jul.
8
Translation, adaptation and pilot testing of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale (PFFS) for use in Malaysia - The PFFS-Malay version (PFFS-M).
Malays Fam Physician. 2021 May 27;16(2):27-36. doi: 10.51866/oa1036. eCollection 2021 Jul 22.
10
Concurrent Validity of Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale (PFFS) in Older Adult Male Veterans with Different Levels of Health Literacy.
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Mar 26;7:23337214211003804. doi: 10.1177/23337214211003804. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
The pictorial fit-frail scale: a novel tool for frailty assessment in critically ill older adults.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05773-4.
4
Translation of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale Into the Greek Language and Examination of Its Validity and Reliability.
Cureus. 2023 Jul 8;15(7):e41553. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41553. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Validation of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale in a Thoracic Surgery Clinic.
Ann Surg. 2023 May 1;277(5):e1150-e1156. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005381. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
6
Concurrent Validity of Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale (PFFS) in Older Adult Male Veterans with Different Levels of Health Literacy.
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 Mar 26;7:23337214211003804. doi: 10.1177/23337214211003804. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Translation, adaptation and pilot testing of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale (PFFS) for use in Malaysia - The PFFS-Malay version (PFFS-M).
Malays Fam Physician. 2021 May 27;16(2):27-36. doi: 10.51866/oa1036. eCollection 2021 Jul 22.
10
Considering Frailty in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development: How Geriatricians Can Assist.
Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Apr 28;16:731-738. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S295522. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
The Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale: Developing a Visual Scale to Assess Frailty.
Can Geriatr J. 2019 Jun 30;22(2):64-74. doi: 10.5770/cgj.22.357. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Can a Prebiotic Formulation Reduce Frailty Levels in Older People?
J Frailty Aging. 2019;8(1):48-52. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2018.39.
3
What do we know about frailty in the acute care setting? A scoping review.
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 11;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0823-2.
5
The impact of frailty on intensive care unit outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Aug;43(8):1105-1122. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4867-0. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
6
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Frailty in elderly people.
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验