Theou O, Jayanama K, Fernández-Garrido J, Buigues C, Pruimboom L, Hoogland A J, Navarro-Martínez R, Rockwood K, Cauli O
Olga Theou, Rm 1313, Veterans' Memorial Building, 5955 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H2E1, Canada. Email:
J Frailty Aging. 2019;8(1):48-52. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2018.39.
The purpose of this study was to examine whether a prebiotic formulation reduces frailty index (FI) levels in older people.
We conducted secondary analysis of a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind design study.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study included non-demented people over the age of 65 who were living in nursing homes and were able to walk. Fifty participants completed the study (75.3±7.3 years, 70% females).
Participants were randomly assigned to either a group who received daily Darmocare Pre® (inulin and fructooligosaccharides) for 13 weeks or a placebo group (maltodextrin).
The primary outcome in this secondary analysis was change in level of a 62-item FI compared to baseline.
At the 13-week follow-up, the placebo group had higher FI levels (preFI 0.23±0.11, postFI 0.24±0.12, p=0.012) and the intervention group had lower FI levels (preFI 0.22±0.09, postFI 0.20±0.08, p<0.001). There was an average increase of 0.01±0.01 in the FI score in the placebo group (0.4 deficits; Cohen's d 0.61; standardized response mean 0.59) and an average reduction of 0.02±0.02 in the intervention group (1.1 deficits; Cohen's d -1.35; standardized response mean -1.16). Among the 28 participants in the intervention group, FI levels were reduced for 25 people; five of them had an FI reduction greater than 0.03. The moderately/severely frail participants (FI >0.3, N=5) had the greatest reduction in their FI (0.04±0.01).
A prebiotic intervention can reduce frailty levels in nursing home residents especially in those with higher levels of frailty.
本研究旨在探讨一种益生元制剂是否能降低老年人的衰弱指数(FI)水平。
我们对一项安慰剂对照、随机、双盲设计研究进行了二次分析。
设置/参与者:该研究纳入了65岁以上居住在养老院且能够行走的非痴呆患者。50名参与者完成了研究(年龄75.3±7.3岁,70%为女性)。
参与者被随机分配至每日服用Darmocare Pre®(菊粉和低聚果糖)13周的组或安慰剂组(麦芽糊精)。
本次二次分析的主要结局是与基线相比,62项FI水平的变化。
在13周随访时,安慰剂组的FI水平较高(基线前FI 0.23±0.11,基线后FI 0.24±0.12,p = 0.012),而干预组的FI水平较低(基线前FI 0.22±0.09,基线后FI 0.20±0.08,p<0.001)。安慰剂组的FI评分平均增加0.01±0.01(0.4个缺陷;Cohen's d 0.61;标准化反应均值0.59),干预组平均降低0.02±0.02(1.1个缺陷;Cohen's d -1.35;标准化反应均值-1.16)。在干预组的28名参与者中,25人的FI水平降低;其中5人的FI降低大于0.03。中度/重度衰弱参与者(FI>0.3,N = 5)的FI降低幅度最大(0.04±0.01)。
益生元干预可降低养老院居民的衰弱水平,尤其是衰弱程度较高者。