Laboratoire de Parasitologie-Mycologie, de Parasitologie-Mycologie Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France.
Mycologie, CHU de Bordeaux, Groupe Hospitalier Pellegrin, place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33000 Bordeaux, France.
Med Mycol. 2020 Jul 1;58(5):639-649. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myz098.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF MS) is routinely used in mycology laboratories to rapidly identify pathogenic yeasts. Various methods have been proposed to perform routine MS-based identification of clinically relevant species. In this study, we focused on Bruker technology and assessed the identification performance of three protocols: two pretreatment methods (rapid formic acid extraction directly performed on targets and full extraction using formic acid/acetonitrile in tubes) and a direct deposit protocol that omits the extraction step. We also examined identification performance using three target types (ground-steel, polished-steel, and biotargets) and two databases (Bruker and online MSI [biological-mass-spectrometry-identification application]) in a multicenter manner. Ten European centers participated in the study, in which a total of 1511 yeast isolates were analyzed. The 10 centers prospectively performed the three protocols on approximately 150 yeast isolates each, and the corresponding spectra were then assessed against two reference spectra databases (MSI and Bruker), with appropriate thresholds. Three centers evaluated the impact of the targets. Scores were compared between the various combinations, and identification accuracy was assessed. The protocol omitting the extraction step was inappropriate for yeast identification, while the full extraction method yielded far better results. Rapid formic acid extraction yielded variable results depending on the target, database and threshold. Selecting the optimal extraction method in combination with the appropriate target, database and threshold may enable simple and accurate identification of clinically relevant yeast samples. Concerning the widely used polished-steel targets, the full extraction method still ensured better scores and better identification rates.
基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-ToF MS)常用于真菌学实验室,以快速鉴定致病性酵母菌。已经提出了各种方法来进行基于 MS 的常规临床相关物种鉴定。在这项研究中,我们专注于布鲁克技术,并评估了三种方案的鉴定性能:两种预处理方法(直接在靶标上进行快速甲酸提取和在管中使用甲酸/乙腈进行全提取)和省略提取步骤的直接沉积方案。我们还通过多中心方式,使用三种靶标类型(钢地面、钢抛光和生物靶标)和两个数据库(布鲁克和在线 MSI [生物质谱鉴定应用程序])检查了鉴定性能。十个欧洲中心参与了这项研究,总共分析了 1511 株酵母菌分离物。十个中心前瞻性地对每个中心约 150 株酵母菌分离物进行了三种方案的处理,然后根据两个参考光谱数据库(MSI 和布鲁克),通过适当的阈值对相应的光谱进行评估。三个中心评估了靶标的影响。比较了各种组合之间的分数,并评估了鉴定准确性。省略提取步骤的方案不适合酵母鉴定,而全提取方法的结果要好得多。快速甲酸提取的结果因靶标、数据库和阈值而异。选择最佳提取方法与适当的靶标、数据库和阈值相结合,可能可以实现对临床相关酵母样本的简单而准确的鉴定。对于广泛使用的钢抛光靶标,全提取方法仍能确保更好的分数和更高的鉴定率。