Suppr超能文献

两种酶联免疫吸附试验用于戊型肝炎血清学诊断的比较评价。

Comparative evaluation of two immunoassays for serological diagnosis of hepatitis E.

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2020 Feb;92(2):260-262. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25601. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

Abstract

Serological testing for immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is useful for diagnosing acute hepatitis E. Our aim was to evaluate the performance of chemiluminescence immunoassay (HEV IgM; Vircell, Granada, Spain) in comparison with a manual enzyme immunoassay (Anti-HEV virus; Wantai, Beijing, China) for anti-HEV IgM detection. Seventeen HEV-RNA positive and 69 HEV-RNA negative sera were tested by both assays. Virclia sensitivity was 94.1%, whereas that of the enzyme immunosorbent assay (EIA) was 76.5%; specificity was 98.5% and 97.1% for Virclia and EIA, respectively. Differences between both assays were not statistically significant. Virclia HEV IgM showed excellent performance and can be a good alternative to conventional enzyme immunoassays for the detection of IgM against HEV.

摘要

血清学检测 IgM 抗体对戊型肝炎病毒(HEV)有助于诊断急性戊型肝炎。本研究旨在评估化学发光免疫分析(HEV IgM;Vircell,格拉纳达,西班牙)与酶联免疫吸附试验(Anti-HEV virus;Wantai,北京,中国)检测抗-HEV IgM 的性能。两种检测方法均检测了 17 份 HEV-RNA 阳性和 69 份 HEV-RNA 阴性血清。Virclia 的敏感性为 94.1%,而酶联免疫吸附试验(EIA)的敏感性为 76.5%;Virclia 和 EIA 的特异性分别为 98.5%和 97.1%。两种检测方法之间无统计学差异。Virclia HEV IgM 表现出优异的性能,可作为传统酶联免疫吸附试验检测抗-HEV IgM 的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验