Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Jan 1;106(1):185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
Recurrent or previously irradiated head and neck cancers (HNC) are therapeutically challenging and may benefit from high-dose, highly accurate radiation techniques, such as stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Here, we compare set-up and positioning accuracy across HNC subsites to further optimize the treatment process and planning target volume (PTV) margin recommendations for head and neck SABR.
We prospectively collected data on 405 treatment fractions across 79 patients treated with SABR for recurrent/previously irradiated HNC. First, interfractional error was determined by comparing ExacTrac x-ray to the treatment plan. Patients were then shifted and residual error was measured with repeat x-ray. Next, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was compared with ExacTrac for positioning agreement, and final shifts were applied. Lastly, intrafractional error was measured with x-ray before each arc. Results were stratified by treatment site into skull base, neck/parotid, and mucosal.
Most patients (66.7%) were treated to 45 Gy in 5 fractions (range, 21-47.5 Gy in 3-5 fractions). The initial mean ± standard deviation interfractional errors were -0.2 ± 1.4 mm (anteroposterior), 0.2 ± 1.8 mm (craniocaudal), and -0.1 ± 1.7 mm (left-right). Interfractional 3-dimensional vector error was 2.48 ± 1.44, with skull base significantly lower than other sites (2.22 vs 2.77; P = .0016). All interfractional errors were corrected to within 1.3 mm and 1.8°. CBCT agreed with ExacTrac to within 3.6 mm and 3.4°. CBCT disagreements and intrafractional errors of >1 mm or >1° occurred at significantly lower rates in skull base sites (CBCT: 16.4% vs 50.0% neck, 52.0% mucosal, P < .0001; intrafractional: 22.0% vs 48.7% all others, P < .0001). Final PTVs were 1.5 mm (skull base), 2.0 mm (neck/parotid), and 1.8 mm (mucosal).
Head and neck SABR PTV margins should be optimized by target site. PTV margins of 1.5 to 2 mm may be sufficient in the skull base, whereas 2 to 2.5 mm may be necessary for neck and mucosal targets. When using ExacTrac, skull base sites show significantly fewer uncertainties throughout the treatment process, but neck/mucosal targets may require the addition of CBCT to account for positioning errors and internal organ motion.
复发性或既往放疗后的头颈部癌症(HNC)的治疗具有挑战性,可能受益于高剂量、高精度的放射技术,如立体定向消融放疗(SABR)。在此,我们比较了 HNC 不同部位的摆位和定位精度,以进一步优化头颈部 SABR 的治疗过程和计划靶区(PTV)边界推荐。
我们前瞻性地收集了 79 例接受 SABR 治疗复发性/既往放疗后 HNC 的 405 个分次的治疗数据。首先,通过比较 ExacTrac X 射线与治疗计划来确定分次间误差。然后,患者移位,用重复 X 射线测量残余误差。接下来,比较锥形束 CT(CBCT)与 ExacTrac 的定位一致性,并应用最终移位。最后,在每个射弧之前用 X 射线测量分次内误差。结果根据治疗部位分为颅底、颈部/腮腺和黏膜。
大多数患者(66.7%)接受 45 Gy/5 次(21-47.5 Gy/3-5 次)治疗。初始平均±标准差分次间误差为-0.2±1.4mm(前-后)、0.2±1.8mm(头-尾)和-0.1±1.7mm(左-右)。分次间三维向量误差为 2.48±1.44,颅底明显低于其他部位(2.22 与 2.77;P=0.0016)。所有分次间误差均纠正至 1.3mm 和 1.8°以内。CBCT 与 ExacTrac 的一致性在 3.6mm 和 3.4°以内。颅底部位的 CBCT 不相符和分次内误差>1mm 或>1°的发生率明显低于颈部(CBCT:16.4%比 50.0%,P<.0001;分次内:22.0%比 48.7%,P<.0001)和黏膜部位(CBCT:16.4%比 50.0%,P<.0001;分次内:22.0%比 48.7%,P<.0001)。最终 PTV 为 1.5mm(颅底)、2.0mm(颈部/腮腺)和 1.8mm(黏膜)。
头颈部 SABR 的 PTV 边界应根据靶区进行优化。颅底的 PTV 边界为 1.5 至 2mm 可能足够,而颈部和黏膜靶区可能需要加用 CBCT 以考虑定位误差和内部器官运动。