• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学教育中的学习协作:探究协作结构与资源以及团队经验的影响。

Learning Collaboratives in Medical Education: Exploring the Impact of Collaboratives' Structure and Resources and Teams' Experience.

机构信息

Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE.

Baylor Scott & White Health, and Texas A&M Health Science Center, Temple, TX.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):297-305. doi: 10.1177/1062860619877941. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

DOI:10.1177/1062860619877941
PMID:31581785
Abstract

The Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers (AIAMC) organized and coordinated a multicenter learning collaborative, National Initiative V (NI V), focused on community health and health inequity. A pre-post descriptive study was designed to examine the outcomes of the AIAMC NI V. Data were collected from pre- and post-assessment surveys as well as a project milestone self-assessment survey. Twenty-nine institutions participated. By the conclusion of the NI, the majority of institutions had completed at least 1 of the milestones in each of the pre-work/background (65.52%), measurement (62.07%), methods (62.07%), and implement/sustain (20.69%) domains. Institutions reported a significant association between their readiness assessments prior to the start of the NI compared with their status of activities on completion. Milestone achievement is significantly associated with 3 of the assessment items. Learning collaboratives with thoughtfully integrated structure and support can be impactful on topic readiness for the participating organizations.

摘要

独立学术医学中心联盟(AIAMC)组织并协调了一个多中心学习合作组织,即第五次国家倡议(NI V),专注于社区健康和健康不平等问题。本研究采用描述性前后研究设计,旨在考察 AIAMC NI V 的结果。数据来自于前后评估调查以及项目里程碑自我评估调查。共有 29 家机构参与。到 NI 结束时,大多数机构已经完成了预工作/背景(65.52%)、测量(62.07%)、方法(62.07%)和实施/维持(20.69%)领域中的至少一个里程碑。机构报告称,在 NI 开始之前的准备情况评估与其完成时的活动状态之间存在显著关联。里程碑的实现与 3 项评估项目显著相关。具有深思熟虑的综合结构和支持的学习合作组织可能会对参与组织的主题准备产生影响。

相似文献

1
Learning Collaboratives in Medical Education: Exploring the Impact of Collaboratives' Structure and Resources and Teams' Experience.医学教育中的学习协作:探究协作结构与资源以及团队经验的影响。
Am J Med Qual. 2020 Jul/Aug;35(4):297-305. doi: 10.1177/1062860619877941. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
2
Preparing Academic Medical Centers for the Clinical Learning Environment Review: Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers National Initiative IV Outcomes and Evaluation.为临床学习环境评审准备学术医疗中心:独立学术医疗中心联盟国家倡议IV成果与评估
Ochsner J. 2016 Summer;16(2):166-71.
3
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
4
Characteristics of successful quality improvement teams: lessons from five collaborative projects in the VHA.成功的质量改进团队的特征:来自退伍军人健康管理局五个合作项目的经验教训。
Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Mar;30(3):152-62. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(04)30017-1.
5
Advice-seeking during implementation: a network study of clinicians participating in a learning collaborative.实施过程中的咨询寻求:参与学习合作的临床医生的网络研究。
Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 28;13(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0797-7.
6
Do quality improvement collaboratives' educational components match the dominant learning style preferences of the participants?质量改进协作组织的教育组成部分是否与参与者占主导地位的学习风格偏好相匹配?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun 20;15:239. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0915-z.
7
All teach, all learn, all improve?: the role of interorganizational learning in quality improvement collaboratives.全员教学、全员学习、全员提升?:组织间学习在质量改进合作中的作用。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2012 Apr-Jun;37(2):154-64. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e31822af831.
8
SSM Health Care clinical collaboratives: improving the value of patient care in a health care system.SSM医疗保健临床协作组织:提升医疗保健系统中患者护理的价值
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Jan;27(1):5-19. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27002-3.
9
Learning about teams by participating in teams.通过参与团队来了解团队。
Acad Med. 2010 Aug;85(8):1303-11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181e5c07a.
10
Learning Collaboratives: Insights And A New Taxonomy From AHRQ's Two Decades Of Experience.学习协作体:来自 AHRQ 二十年经验的洞察与新分类法。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Feb;37(2):205-212. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1144.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning Networks: How Family Medicine Departments Are Meeting the Requirement.学习网络:家庭医学系如何满足要求。
Fam Med. 2024 Oct;56(9):561-566. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.556157. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
2
Learning Collaboratives: a Strategy for Quality Improvement and Implementation in Behavioral Health.学习协作组织:行为健康领域的质量改进和实施策略。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr;50(2):263-278. doi: 10.1007/s11414-022-09826-z. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
3
Readiness to Provide Medications for Addiction Treatment in HIV Clinics: A Multisite Mixed-Methods Formative Evaluation.
准备在 HIV 诊所提供成瘾治疗药物:一项多地点混合方法形成性评估。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 Jul 1;87(3):959-970. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002666.