Suppr超能文献

针刺与枸橼酸氯米酚治疗排卵障碍性不孕:系统评价与荟萃分析。

Acupuncture and clomiphene citrate for anovulatory infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Clinical Medical College, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

The 3rd Teaching Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Acupunct Med. 2020 Feb;38(1):25-36. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2017-011629. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of acupuncture or acupuncture combined with clomiphene citrate (CC) versus CC alone on the outcomes of anovulatory infertility.

METHODS

A literature search in eight databases yielded nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the comparative effectiveness of acupuncture and CC in anovulatory infertility. Subsequently, data were extracted and the studies were assessed for the quality of their methodological designs and risk of bias. Meta-analyses of the RCT data were conducted.

RESULTS

Nine trials including 1441 women were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the rates of pregnancy (odds ratio (OR) 1.18, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.69), ovulation (OR 2.57, 95% CI 0.59 to 11.29) or pregnancy loss (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.63) when acupuncture was used as an adjuvant therapy alongside CC. Although acupuncture alone did not increase the ovulation rate (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.49), our review demonstrated superior effects in patients who received acupuncture as a separate treatment modality with respect to both the pregnancy rate (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.10) and the maximum follicular diameter (mean difference 0.50 mm, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.56 mm) when compared with CC alone. Statistical analysis also showed a reduction in the rate of pregnancy loss when acupuncture was used as a separate treatment compared with CC alone (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the above pooled results of the studies, the use of acupuncture as a monotherapy significantly improved the rate of pregnancy among the study participants compared with the use of CC alone. However, any results drawn from these studies should be interpreted with caution when considering the context of clinical practice.

摘要

目的

评估针灸或针灸联合枸橼酸氯米酚(CC)与 CC 单独治疗排卵障碍性不孕的疗效比较。

方法

在 8 个数据库中进行文献检索,共纳入 9 项评估针灸和 CC 治疗排卵障碍性不孕的疗效比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。随后,提取数据并评估研究的方法学设计质量和偏倚风险。对 RCT 数据进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入的 9 项试验共包括 1441 名女性。当 CC 联合针灸作为辅助治疗时,妊娠率(优势比(OR)1.18,95%置信区间(CI)0.83 至 1.69)、排卵率(OR 2.57,95%CI 0.59 至 11.29)和流产率(OR 0.98,95%CI 0.59 至 1.63)无显著差异。虽然单独使用针灸不能提高排卵率(OR 0.41,95%CI 0.11 至 1.49),但我们的综述表明,对于单独接受针灸治疗的患者,在妊娠率(OR 2.34,95%CI 1.76 至 3.10)和最大卵泡直径(平均差值 0.50mm,95%CI 0.44 至 0.56mm)方面,针灸的效果优于 CC 单独治疗。与 CC 单独治疗相比,针灸单独治疗的流产率也降低(OR 0.19,95%CI 0.08 至 0.45)。

结论

基于这些研究的汇总结果,与 CC 单独治疗相比,针灸作为单一疗法可显著提高研究参与者的妊娠率。然而,在考虑临床实践的背景时,应谨慎解释这些研究的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验