Clinical Medical College, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
The 3rd Teaching Hospital, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Acupunct Med. 2020 Feb;38(1):25-36. doi: 10.1136/acupmed-2017-011629. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of acupuncture or acupuncture combined with clomiphene citrate (CC) versus CC alone on the outcomes of anovulatory infertility.
A literature search in eight databases yielded nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the comparative effectiveness of acupuncture and CC in anovulatory infertility. Subsequently, data were extracted and the studies were assessed for the quality of their methodological designs and risk of bias. Meta-analyses of the RCT data were conducted.
Nine trials including 1441 women were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the rates of pregnancy (odds ratio (OR) 1.18, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.69), ovulation (OR 2.57, 95% CI 0.59 to 11.29) or pregnancy loss (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.63) when acupuncture was used as an adjuvant therapy alongside CC. Although acupuncture alone did not increase the ovulation rate (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.49), our review demonstrated superior effects in patients who received acupuncture as a separate treatment modality with respect to both the pregnancy rate (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.76 to 3.10) and the maximum follicular diameter (mean difference 0.50 mm, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.56 mm) when compared with CC alone. Statistical analysis also showed a reduction in the rate of pregnancy loss when acupuncture was used as a separate treatment compared with CC alone (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.45).
Based on the above pooled results of the studies, the use of acupuncture as a monotherapy significantly improved the rate of pregnancy among the study participants compared with the use of CC alone. However, any results drawn from these studies should be interpreted with caution when considering the context of clinical practice.
评估针灸或针灸联合枸橼酸氯米酚(CC)与 CC 单独治疗排卵障碍性不孕的疗效比较。
在 8 个数据库中进行文献检索,共纳入 9 项评估针灸和 CC 治疗排卵障碍性不孕的疗效比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。随后,提取数据并评估研究的方法学设计质量和偏倚风险。对 RCT 数据进行荟萃分析。
纳入的 9 项试验共包括 1441 名女性。当 CC 联合针灸作为辅助治疗时,妊娠率(优势比(OR)1.18,95%置信区间(CI)0.83 至 1.69)、排卵率(OR 2.57,95%CI 0.59 至 11.29)和流产率(OR 0.98,95%CI 0.59 至 1.63)无显著差异。虽然单独使用针灸不能提高排卵率(OR 0.41,95%CI 0.11 至 1.49),但我们的综述表明,对于单独接受针灸治疗的患者,在妊娠率(OR 2.34,95%CI 1.76 至 3.10)和最大卵泡直径(平均差值 0.50mm,95%CI 0.44 至 0.56mm)方面,针灸的效果优于 CC 单独治疗。与 CC 单独治疗相比,针灸单独治疗的流产率也降低(OR 0.19,95%CI 0.08 至 0.45)。
基于这些研究的汇总结果,与 CC 单独治疗相比,针灸作为单一疗法可显著提高研究参与者的妊娠率。然而,在考虑临床实践的背景时,应谨慎解释这些研究的结果。