Ladin Keren, Marotta Satia A, Butt Zeeshan, Gordon Elisa J, Daniels Norman, Lavelle Tara A, Hanto Douglas W
Department of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Prog Transplant. 2019 Dec;29(4):344-353. doi: 10.1177/1526924819874387. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
Social support is a key component of transplantation evaluation in the United States. Social support definitions and evaluation procedures require examination to achieve clear, consistent implementation. We surveyed psychosocial clinicians from the Society for Transplant Social Workers and American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their definitions and evaluation procedures for using social support to determine transplant eligibility. Bivariate statistical analysis was used for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data. Among 276 psychosocial clinicians (50.2% response rate), 92% had ruled out patients from transplantation due to inadequate support. Social support definitions varied significantly: 10% of respondents indicated their center lacked a definition. Key domains of social support included informational, emotional, instrumental, motivational, paid support, and the patient's importance to others. Almost half of clinicians (47%) rarely or never requested second opinions when excluding patients due to social support. Confidence and perceived clarity and consistency in center guidelines were significantly associated with informing patients when support contributed to negative wait-listing decisions ( = .001). Clinicians who excluded fewer patients because of social support offered significantly more supportive health care ( = .02). Clearer definitions and more supportive care may reduce the number of patients excluded from transplant candidacy due to inadequate social support.
在美国,社会支持是移植评估的关键组成部分。社会支持的定义和评估程序需要进行审视,以实现清晰、一致的实施。我们对移植社会工作者协会和美国移植外科医生协会的心理社会临床医生进行了调查,了解他们使用社会支持来确定移植资格的定义和评估程序。定量数据采用双变量统计分析,定性数据采用内容分析。在276名心理社会临床医生中(回复率为50.2%),92%的人因支持不足而将患者排除在移植之外。社会支持的定义差异很大:10%的受访者表示他们的中心没有定义。社会支持的关键领域包括信息、情感、工具性、动机性、付费支持以及患者对他人的重要性。几乎一半的临床医生(47%)在因社会支持排除患者时很少或从不寻求第二意见。当支持导致负面的等待名单决定时,中心指南中的信心以及感知到的清晰度和一致性与告知患者显著相关(=0.001)。因社会支持而排除患者较少的临床医生提供的支持性医疗服务明显更多(=0.02)。更清晰的定义和更具支持性的护理可能会减少因社会支持不足而被排除在移植候选名单之外的患者数量。